Abstract
Informed consent for children is traditionally obtained by agreement between physicians and parents acting for themselves and their child. In marrow transplantation, donors undergo a hazardous procedure of no physical benefit. Parental ability to consent for donor or critically ill recipient is compromised. A system was devised to represent the interests of parents, donor and recipient in this setting. This included peer review, a court appointed donor guardian, psychiatric consultation, full age-appropriate explanations to all parties and judicial review. Despite fears about over-publicity and over-informed participants, outside observers agreed that maximum information transfer occurred which allowed easier hospitalization. Three cases of severe unresponsive aplastic anemia are presented in which selection of decision-makers, use of veto power, and the concept of consensus were involved. In 1 consent for transplantation was unanimous. The patient recovered. Parents refused permission in the second case. The patient died. In a third case consent was felt to be unobtainable from a brain damaged donor. A court permitted this donation. Assessing the competence of a minor to protect his interests and to give consent should be a critical objective of developmental pediatrics. Bone marrow transplantation in aplastic anemia can be regarded as a model for the study and development of approaches to ethical decisions in the application of advanced lifesaving technologies.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levine, K., Camitta, B., Nathan, D. et al. PEDIATRIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION-A BIO-ETHICAL MODEL. Pediatr Res 8, 471 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-197404000-00789
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-197404000-00789