Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Alpine-type Ultramafic Rocks as Evidence for Ensimatic or Ensialic Environments

Abstract

Chidester and Cady suggested1 that Alpine-type ultramafic rocks can be separated into two groups which they consider to be genetically similar but environmentally distinct: (1) plutons intruded into eugeosynclinal metasediments and generated at or near a mantle rift beneath a continental (sialic) crust; and (2) sheet-like masses associated within allochthonous ophiolite complexes, generated at a spreading plate margin beneath ocean (simatic) crust. They pointed out that the ensialic plutons of type (1) are found throughout the Lower Palaeozoic Appalachians northwards towards Newfoundland, whereas the ensimatic type (2) plutons are only found in Newfoundland.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Chidester, A. H., & Cady, W. M., Nature Physical Science, 240, 27 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson, J. T., Nature, 211, 676 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dewey, J. F., Nature, 111 124 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leake, B. E., Mechanism of Igneous Intrusion, 103 (edit, by Newall, G., and Rast, N.), Geol. J. Spec. Pub., 2 (Liverpool, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, J. W., Scott. J. Geol., 8, 363 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chidester, A. H., in Geology (edit, by Zen, A., et al.), 343 (Interscience, New York and London, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weedon, D. S., Scott. J. Geol., 6, 26 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Munro, M., Scott. J. Geol., 6, 41 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Allan, W. C., Scott. J. Geol., 6, 53 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey, E. B., & McCallien, W. J., Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., 17, 33 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bird, J. M., Dewey, J. F., & Kidd, W. S. F., Nature Physical Science, 231, 28 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Church, W. R., & Gayer, R. A., Geol. Mag. (in the press).

  13. Church, W. R., & Stevens, R. K., J. Geophys. Res., 76, 1460 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, H., & Malpas, J., Canad. J. Earth Sci., 9, 1216 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oxburgh, E. R., Nature, 239, 202 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BAKER, J., GAYER, R. Alpine-type Ultramafic Rocks as Evidence for Ensimatic or Ensialic Environments. Nature Physical Science 242, 105–106 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/physci242105a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/physci242105a0

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing