Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Anomalous Redshifts Reviewed

Abstract

IN a survey of the agreement between reliable optical and 21 cm systemic velocities of 130 galaxies, Roberts1 finds that the regression line has a slope of one and passes within 1 km sāˆ’1 of the origin. There is therefore exact statistical agreement between the two rays of determining the systemic velocity, confirming the form of the Doppler relation for wavelengths differing by a factor of 3Ɨ105 over a velocity range of 5,600 km sāˆ’1. But because the optical velocities are usually measured from emission lines in the nuclei, whereas the 21 cm velocities come from the mean velocity of gas spread over the whole plane, Roberts's result also shows that in general the nuclear systemic velocity agrees with that of the disk. It is therefore unlikely that any component of a non-Doppler redshift is present in the nuclear systemic velocities. It is difficult to reconcile Arp's2 suggested anomalous redshift of small galaxies with Roberts's result. In view of the importance of a substantial non-Doppler redshift, were it to be confirmed, Arp's test for a redshift anomaly is repeated here using a larger sample of data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Roberts, M. S., Proc. Intern. Astron. Union Symp. No. 44 (edit. by Evans, D. S.) (in the press).

  2. Arp, H., Nature, 225, 1033 (1970).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. De Vaucouleurs, G., Stars and Stellar Systems (edit. by Kuiper, G., and Middlehurst, B.), 9 (1967).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Page, T., Astrophys. J., 159, 791 (1970).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Page, T., Proc. Fourth Berkeley Symp. Math. Stat, and Prob., 3, 277 (1961).

    ADSĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Demoulin, M. H., and Burbidge, E. M., Astrophys. J., 159, 799 (1970).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., and Prendergast, K. H., Astrophys. J., 130, 26 (1959).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Rubin, V. C., and Ford, W. K., Astrophys. J., 154, 431 (1968).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Lewis, B. M., Proc. Astron. Soc. Australia, 1, 288 (1969).

    ArticleĀ  ADSĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LEWIS, B. Anomalous Redshifts Reviewed. Nature Physical Science 230, 13ā€“15 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/physci230013b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/physci230013b0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter ā€” what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing