Article

Translation of an evidence-based asthma intervention: Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) in the United States and Australia

  • Primary Care Respiratory Journal (2012) 22, 2936
  • doi:10.4104/pcrj.2012.00093
  • Download Citation
Received:
Revised:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Background:

Physician Asthma Care Education (PACE) is a programme developed in the USA to improve paediatric asthma outcomes.

Aims:

To examine translation of PACE to Australia.

Methods:

The RE-AIM framework was used to assess translation. Demographic characteristics and findings regarding clinical asthma outcomes from PACE randomised clinical trials in both countries were examined. Qualitative content analysis was used to examine fidelity to intervention components.

Results:

Both iterations of PACE reached similar target audiences (general practice physicians and paediatric patients with asthma); however, in the USA, more children with persistent disease were enrolled. In both countries, participation comprised approximately 10% of eligible physicians and 25% of patients. In both countries, PACE deployed well-known local physicians and behavioural scientists as facilitators. Sponsorship of the programme was provided by professional associations and government agencies. Fidelity to essential programme elements was observed, but PACE Australia workshops included additional components. Similar outcomes included improvements in clinician confidence in developing short-term and long-term care plans, prescribing inhaled corticosteroids, and providing written management instructions to patients. No additional time was spent in the patient visit compared with controls. US PACE realised reductions in symptoms and healthcare use, results that could not be confirmed in Australia because of limitations in follow-up time and sample sizes. US PACE is maintained through a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute website. Development of maintenance strategies for PACE Australia is underway.

Conclusions:

Based on criteria of the RE-AIM framework, the US version of PACE has been successfully translated for use in Australia.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , . Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): Global Burden of Asthma. 2012. Available from: (cited 18 Apr 2012).

  2. 2.

    Australian Centre for Asthma Monitoring. Asthma in Australia 2011: with a focus chapter on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Asthma series no. 4. Cat. no. ACM 22. Canberra: AIHW. 2011. Available from: (cited 2 Mar 2012).

  3. 3.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: asthma prevalence, disease characteristics, and self-management education: United States, 2001–2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60(17):547–52.

  4. 4.

    , , , et al. Impact of education for physicians on patient outcomes. Pediatrics 1998;101(5):831–6.

  5. 5.

    , , , et al. Impact of physician asthma care education on patient outcomes. Pediatrics 2006;117(6):2149–57.

  6. 6.

    , , , et al. Feasibility study of a communication and education asthma intervention for general practitioners in Australia. Aust J Prim Health 2010;16(1):75–80.

  7. 7.

    , , , et al. Improving paediatric asthma outcomes in primary health care: a randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2011;195(7):405–09.

  8. 8.

    , , . Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999;89(9):1322–7.

  9. 9.

    , , , . The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns 2001;44(2):119–27.

  10. 10.

    , , , et al. Improving physician attendance at educational seminars sponsored by managed care organizations. Manag Care 2004;13(9):49–51.

  11. 11.

    , , , . Reasons for pediatrician nonadherence to asthma guidelines. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155(9):1057–62.

  12. 12.

    , , , et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282(15):1458–65.

  13. 13.

    , , , , . Long-term outcomes of physician peer teaching. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2008;47(9):883–90.

  14. 14.

    , , , . Keeping children with asthma out of hospitals: parents' and physicians' perspectives on how pediatric asthma hospitalizations can be prevented. Pediatrics 2005;116(4):957–65.

  15. 15.

    National Asthma Council of Australia. Asthma Cycle of Care. 2012. Available from: (cited 18 Apr 2012)

  16. 16.

    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Physician Asthma Care Education. 2006. Available from: (cited 18 Apr 2012).

  17. 17.

    National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Asthma, National Asthma Control Initiative. 2011. Available from: (cited 18 Apr 2012).

  18. 18.

    , , , et al. Self-reported physician practices for children with asthma: are national guidelines followed? Pediatrics 2000;106(4):886–96.

  19. 19.

    , , , et al. Barriers to adherence to asthma management guidelines among inner-city primary care providers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008;101(3):264–70. .

  20. 20.

    , , , , , . Coding for asthma patient education in the primary care setting. J Med Prac Manage 2005;21:115–19.

  21. 21.

    , , . How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Fam Pract 2007;24(6):601–03.

  22. 22.

    , , , et al. Improving quality of care and promoting health care system change: the role of community-based coalitions. Health Promot Pract 2006;7(2 Suppl):87–95S.

  23. 23.

    , . A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(6):637–44.

  24. 24.

    . What types of evidence are most needed to advance behavioral medicine? Ann Behav Med 2008;35(1):19–25.

  25. 25.

    , , . Challenges and lessons learned from the translation of evidence-based childhood asthma interventions: a commentary on the MCAN initiative. Health Promot Pract 2011;12(6):91–9S.

  26. 26.

    , , . An organizing framework for translation in public health: the Knowledge to Action Framework. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(2):A46.

  27. 27.

    , , . Practice-based research: “Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297(4):403–06.

  28. 28.

    Education for Health. 2012. Available from: (cited 25 Sep 2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Handling editor Hilary Pinnock

Statistical review Gopal Netuveli

The authors would like to thank Katherine Faiver (University of Michigan) and Pin-Pin Song (University of Michigan) for their assistance with formatting this manuscript, and Edward Green (University of Michigan) for statistical assistance.

Funding In Australia this work was supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Aging, Asthma Management Program and, in the USA, by the National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Princeton, NJ).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Managing Chronic Disease, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    • Minal R Patel
    • , Randall W Brown
    •  & Noreen M Clark
  2. University of Sydney, NSW, Australia

    • Smita Shah
    • , Craig Mellis
    •  & Christine Jenkins
  3. Division of General Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

    • Michael D Cabana
  4. Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    • Susan M Sawyer
  5. Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, NSW, Australia

    • Brett Toelle

Authors

  1. Search for Minal R Patel in:

  2. Search for Smita Shah in:

  3. Search for Michael D Cabana in:

  4. Search for Susan M Sawyer in:

  5. Search for Brett Toelle in:

  6. Search for Craig Mellis in:

  7. Search for Christine Jenkins in:

  8. Search for Randall W Brown in:

  9. Search for Noreen M Clark in:

Contributions

MRP and SS contributed to study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. MDC, SS, CM, BT, CJ, and RWB contributed to drafting and revision of the manuscript. NMC contributed to study concept and design, interpretation of the data, and drafting and revision of the manuscript.

Competing interests

SS and RWB have received research support from Astra Zeneca Pharmaceuticals. MDC and RWB have been advisors and members of the Merck Pharmaceuticals speaker's bureau. MRP, SS, CJ, BT, CM, and NMC have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noreen M Clark.