Abstract
Environmental drug resistance constitutes a serious impediment for therapeutic intervention in multiple myeloma. Tumor-promoting cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), induce nuclear factor-κB (NFκB)- driven expression of pro-survival factors, which confer resistance in myeloma cells to apoptotic insults from TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and other chemotherapeutic drugs. It is thought that RelA:p50 dimer, activated from IκBα-inhibited complex in response to TNF-induced canonical NFκB signal, mediates the pro-survival NFκB function in cancerous cells. Myeloma cells additionally acquire gain-of-function mutations in the non-canonical NFκB module, which induces partial proteolysis of p100 into p52 to promote RelB:p52/NFκB activation from p100-inhibited complex during immune cell differentiation. However, role of non-canonical NFκB signaling in the drug resistance in multiple myeloma remains unclear. Here we report that myeloma-associated non-canonical aberrations reinforce pro-survival TNF signaling in producing a protracted TRAIL-refractory state. These mutations did not act through a typical p52 NFκB complex, but completely degraded p100 to reposition RelB under IκBα control, whose degradation during TNF signaling induced an early RelB:p50 containing NFκB activity. More so, autoregulatory RelB synthesis prolonged this TNF-induced RelB:p50 activity in myeloma cells harboring non-canonical mutations. Intriguingly, TNF-activated RelB:p50 dimer was both necessary and sufficient, and RelA was not required, for NFκB-dependent pro-survival gene expressions and suppression of apoptosis. Indeed, high RelB mRNA expressions in myeloma patients correlated with the augmented level of pro-survival factors and resistance to therapeutic intervention. In sum, we provide evidence that cancer-associated mutations perpetuate TNF-induced pro-survival NFκB activity through autoregulatory RelB control and thereby exacerbate environmental drug resistance in multiple myeloma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Multiple myeloma, an incurable plasma cell malignancy, accounts for ~13% of all hematological cancers.1 Disease progression involves clonal expansion of transformed plasma cells into tumors in the bone marrow. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and other chemotherapeutic drugs induce Caspase-8 dependent apoptosis in various cancerous cells with negligible toxicity for healthy cells.2 Preclinical studies accordingly advocated for TRAIL-based interventions in multiple myeloma.3, 4, 5 However, subsequent clinical trials revealed a rather moderate benefit with only a small subset of patients responding satisfactorily to TRAIL.2, 6 Indeed, certain patient-derived myeloma cells were found to be resistant to drug-induced apoptosis owing to increased level of cFLIP and other pro-survival factors, which counteract caspase activation.4 As drug resistance constitutes a serious impediment for myeloma therapy, it is important to understand fully the underlying molecular mechanisms.
In myeloma cells, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) induces expression of the pro-survival factors, which are known to confer resistance to apoptotic insults, including TRAIL.7, 8, 9 Bone marrow stromal cells provide paracrine TNF signals in myeloma.10 Serum level of TNF was correlated with disease severity in multiple myeloma,11, 12 and provided for a predictive indicator of high symptom burden for patients undergoing maintenance therapy.13 Clinical trials also demonstrated that thalidomide analogs, which inhibit TNF production in the tumor microenvironment, enhance overall response in TRAIL-based therapy.14, 15 These studies implicated TNF in environmental-mediated drug resistance in multiple myeloma.
At the molecular level, TNF engages NEMO (nuclear factor-κB (NFκB_ essential modulator)-IKK2 (IκB kinase subunit 2, also known as IKKβ) kinase complex, which promotes phosphorylation and degradation of inhibitory IκBα (inhibitor of NF-κBα), thereby, liberating RelA:p50 dimer into the nucleus via the canonical NFκB pathway.16 In a negative feedback loop, RelA:p50 transcriptionally induces synthesis of IκBα, which ensures post-induction attenuation of RelA:p50/NFκB activity. TNF stimulates transcription of pro-survival factors from their cognate κB-driven promoters. It is commonly believed that RelA:p50 mediates this pro-survival NFκB function in myeloma cells.7 Importantly, IKK inhibitors were shown to sensitize myeloma cells to apoptotic death.17, 18
In addition, a distinct non-canonical NFκB pathway is activated by cell-differentiating cues in physiological settings.19 In resting cells, cIAP1/cIAP2 and TRAF3-dependent ubiquitination promotes degradation of NIK (NFκB inducing kinase). Induction of the non-canonical pathway rescues NIK from constitutive degradation resulting in activation of IKK1 (IκB kinase subunit 1, also known as IKKα). IKK1 phosphorylates Nfkb2-encoded precursor p100, which retains RelB in the cytoplasmic complex in unstimulated cells. Subsequent partial proteolysis or processing of p100 removes the C-terminal inhibitory domain to generate mature p52 subunit, thereby liberating RelB:p52/NFκB activity into the nucleus. Myeloma cells acquire gain-of-function mutations in this non-canonical NFκB pathway with separate studies reporting ~10–15% multiple myeloma patients harbor such genetic aberrations.18, 20, 21 Myeloma-associated mutations either inactivate negative regulators of NIK, such as cIAP1/cIAP2 and TRAF3, or augment expression of upstream inducers of the pathway, including CD40, LTβR as well as NIK itself.18, 22, 23 Moreover, mutations in Nfkb2 that produce dysfunctional p100 lacking the NFκB inhibitory domain has been reported.24 It was proposed that NIK activates the canonical IKK2-RelA pathway in a subset of human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) to promote cell survival.18, 22, 25 However, a role of NIK-induced non-canonical RelB/NFκB activity in imparting drug resistance in multiple myeloma has not been explored.
The RelB/NFκB-mediated gene expressions is thought to have limited physiological functions in immune cell differentiation.19 Interestingly, a low level of NIK-independent, constitutive RelB:p52/NFκB activity has been identified in myeloma cells.26 Surprisingly, constitutive RelB:p52 activity was shown both to promote and suppress NFκB-dependent gene expressions in HMCLs and patient-derived myeloma cells.26, 27 As NFκB target genes encode important pro-survival factors, we asked if mutational activation of the non-canonical RelB/NFκB pathway modulates TNF response, and thereby modifies resistance of myeloma cells to apoptotic insults.
Here, we demonstrate that non-canonical NFκB mutations collaborate with TNF signaling in producing a protracted TRAIL-refractory state in myeloma cells. In an interdisciplinary approach, we identify that depletion of p100, owing aberrations in the non-canonical module, triggers an autoregulatory RelB pathway, which perpetuates an alternate RelB:p50 NF-κB activity in response to TNF. Intriguingly, pro-survival TNF response is attributed to RelB:p50, and not RelA:p50, NFκB activity in myeloma cells harboring non-canonical mutations. Finally, our database analyses indicate a possible role of autoregulatory RelB/NFκB pathway in resistance of myeloma patients from therapeutic intervention. In sum, we provide evidence that cancer-associated mutations perpetuate TNF-induced pro-survival NFκB response through autoregulatory RelB control and thereby exacerbate environmental drug resistance in multiple myeloma.
Results
Non-canonical NFκB mutations collaborate with TNF in exacerbating resistance of myeloma cells to apoptotic insults
Given prevalence of mutations in the non-canonical NFκB module in multiple myeloma, we examined if these mutations alter resistance of cancerous cells to apoptotic TRAIL. We analyzed HMCLs with mutations in the non-canonical pathway; KMS28PE as well as KMS20 harbor genetic aberration in locus encoding cIAPs, OciMy1 bears homozygous deletion of Traf3, and JK6L contains an inactivating mutation in Nfkb2/p100.18, 22, 28 As a control, we used OciMy5 cells that lack non-canonical mutations but bear an amplification of Nfkb1. However, cell treatment using 100 ng/ml of TRAIL led to similar ~45-55% cell death at 12 h post-treatment in these HMCLs irrespective of mutations in non-canonical module (Figure 1a and Supplementary Figure S1a). TNF treatment alone had no discernible effect on cell viability (Figure 1a). It has been suggested that TNF instill a refractory state in myeloma cells present in the bone marrow that then become resistant to TRAIL and other chemotherapeutic agents.8, 9 To capture this pathological role of TNF, we primed myeloma cells with TNF and subsequently exposed them to TRAIL at 8 h post-TNF treatment. Interestingly, TNF priming resulted in ~50% protection from TRAIL-mediated cell death specifically in HMCLs harboring non-canonical mutations, such as KMS28PE, JK6L, KMS20 and OciMy1, with only marginal effect in control OciMy5 cells (Figure 1b). Our fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses revealed early apoptotic death in 32% KMS28PE and 33.3% JK6L cells within 4 h of TRAIL treatment (Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure S1b) and also consistently demonstrated that TNF priming led to more than 40% reduction in TRAIL-induced apoptotic cell death in KMS28PE as well as JK6L cells (Figure 1c). These results indicated that activating mutations in the non-canonical NFκB module might not act independently, but collaborate with TNF in exacerbating resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs in multiple myeloma.
Perpetuating RelB:p50/NFκB activity confers TRAIL resistance in TNF-primed HMCLs harboring non-canonical mutations
Because TNF-induced pro-survival mechanisms are thought to involve the canonical NFκB pathway, we tested whether these non-canonical mutations strengthen TNF-activated RelA/NFκB response. Our electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and supershift analyses revealed that TNF induced comparable nuclear RelA NFκB DNA-binding activity, which was similarly attenuated by 8 h in OciMy5, KMS28PE, JK6L and OciMy1 cell lines regardless of non-canonical mutations (Figures 2a and b). TNF signal led to very weak, if any, RelA NFκB activation in KMS20 cells. Curiously, TNF activated an additional RelB:p50 containing NFκB dimer in HMCLs with non-canonical mutations, but not in control OciMy5 cell line. Unlike diminishing RelA:p50 activity, RelB:p50 dimer progressively accumulated in the nucleus of these cells producing robust κB DNA-binding activity at 8 h post-stimulation (Figures 2a and b). Induction of canonical NFκB signaling using PMA/Ionomycin also induced prolonged RelB:p50 response in JK6L cells (Supplementary Figure S2a). Prior studies have suggested that p100, instead of being partially proteolysed into p52, undergoes complete degradation in myeloma-derived cells in the presence of chronic non-canonical signal.29, 30 As RelB:p52 constituted only a minor NFκB DNA-binding activity in KMS28PE and JK6L cells (Figure 2b), we examined whether activating mutations in the non-canonical module led to degradation of p100. Our immunoblot analyses revealed a severe reduction in p100 levels in KMS28PE, KMS20 and OciMy1 cells, as opposed to control OciMy5 cell line (Figure 2c). Consistent to earlier observation on p100 degradation,29 we were unable to detect p52 accumulation concomitant to p100 depletion in HMCLs possessing non-canonical mutations. Likewise, JK6L expressed an unstable form of truncated p100 only at a reduced level without p52 accumulation. However, NFκB2 mRNA levels were comparable in these HMCLs (Supplementary Figure S2b). We also observed significantly a reduced level of RelA protein in KMS20 cells (Figure 2c), which likely have contributed to the diminished RelA/NFκB activity in these cells.
Next, we investigated role of individual NFκB dimers in HMCLs bearing distorted non-canonical module. We found that shRNA-mediated knockdown of RelA expression does not impact TRAIL resistance of TNF-primed KMS28PE cells in our cell-death assay (Figure 2d and Supplementary Figure S2c). Intact TRAIL resistance of KMS28PE cells subjected to knockdown of NFκB2 mRNA suggested that p52 is dispensable for the protective effect of TNF (Figure 2d and Supplementary Figure S2d). Remarkably, shRNA depletion identified that RelB is critical for the resilience of TNF-primed KMS28PE cells to subsequent TRAIL treatment (Figure 2d and Supplementary Figure S2e). Our data indicated that prolonged RelB/NFκB activity induced by TNF is responsible for the protracted drug-refractory state of HMCLs harboring non-canonical aberrations, and that this resistance is independent of RelA. These studies also raised a mechanistic conundrum as activating mutations in the non-canonical NFκB module do not appear to act through RelB:p52; rather they promote perpetuating RelB:p50/NFκB response to canonical TNF signal.
A lack of p100 promotes RelB:p50/NFκB activation upon TNF stimulation
How do aberrations in the non-canonical module instruct altered NFκB dimer usage during canonical signaling? In resting cells, RelB is thought to be sequestered in RelB:p100 complex, which is insensitive to canonical signals. In specialized cell types, however, RelB:p50 dimer was shown to bind to IκBα and translocate into the nucleus upon IκBα degradation.31 To further understand RelB/NFκB control in inflammatory settings, we rewired p100- and IκBα-mediated regulations in a mathematical model, termed the NFκB Systems Model v2.0 (see Supplementary Appendix for a detailed description). Our computational simulations suggested that a small fraction of RelB is sequestered by IκBα in unstimulated WT cells, and that abundance of RelB–IκBα complex is increased by threefold in the p100-deficient system (Figure 3a). We tested these predictions using genetically defined mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Our immunoprecipitation analyses demonstrated that RelB associates with p100 as well as p50, and also binds to IκBα in WT cells. Moreover, abundance of RelB–IκBα complex was augmented in Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 3b). RelB also bound to IκBɛ in the absence of p100 (Supplementary Figure S3a). We concluded that the absence of p100 facilitates complex formation between RelB and classical IκBs, which respond to canonical NF-κB signal.
Consistently, elevated level of latent RelB–IκB complex promoted induction of nuclear RelB:p50/NFκB activity within 30 min of TNF stimulation in Nfkb2−/− MEFs with only minor RelB:p50 induction in WT cells (Figures 3c and d and Supplementary Figure S3b). Although this early RelB:p50 activity was attenuated by 1 h, TNF additionally stimulated a late RelB:p50 NFκB DNA-binding activity, which gradually accumulated in the nucleus between 2 and 8 h in Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 3c). Defective attenuation of early RelB:p50 activity at 1 h in IκBα-deficient MEFs (Figure 3e) suggested that IκBα negative feedback regulates the duration of early RelB:p50 response, analogous to RelA:p50 control. Absence of IκBα feedback, however, did not promote RelB:p50 activity at 8 h in IκBα-deficient MEFs (Figure 3e) indicating that additional mechanisms potentiate this late activity.
Although our computational simulation faithfully reproduced early RelB:p50 induction, it failed to capture progressive nuclear accumulation of late-acting RelB:p50 dimer observed in TNF-stimulated Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 3f). It was shown that RelA:p50 induces the expression of RelB mRNA from the κB-driven promoter (Supplementary Figures S3c and S4a).32 We hypothesized that RelA-driven RelB synthesis promotes this late RelB:p50 activity. TNF stimulation of Relb−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs expressing RelB from either a constitutive or a κB-driven retroviral promoter (Supplementary Figure S3d) confirmed that κB-dependent expression of RelB is necessary for late, but not early, RelB:p50 induction in the absence of p100 (Figure 3g). Our immunoprecipitation analyses indicated that p100 sequesters RelB to curtail this late-acting RelB:p50 response in WT cells (Supplementary Figure S3e).33 Even so, implementation of RelA-driven RelB synthesis in our mathematical model was insufficient for recapitulating late RelB:p50 activity in Nfkb2−/− cells (Figure 3f). Our analyses revealed that a lack of p100 not only provokes early RelB:p50 activity, but also unleashed a robust late-acting RelB:p50 response to TNF. This persistent RelB:p50 response in Nfkb2−/− cells mirrored the prolonged RelB:p50 activity observed in HMCLs devoid of p100. However, our biochemical and computational studies suggested that well-documented mechanisms, those include IκBα mediated regulations and RelA-induced synthesis control, are inadequate to account for the prolonged RelB:p50/NFκB response during canonical TNF signaling.
An autoregulatory circuit prolongs RelB:p50/NFκB activity upon TNF stimulation of p100-deficient system
Although κB sites in the Relb promoter were necessary, RelA-driven synthesis of RelB was not sufficient for prolonged RelB:p50/NFκB response to TNF in p100-depleted cell systems (Figures 3f and g). We examined if the RelB:p50 dimer per se mediates RelB synthesis in perpetuating RelB:p50/NFκB activity. Our in vitro DNA-binding analyses revealed that RelA:p50 and RelB:p50 both bind to the conserved κB sites present in Relb promoter with comparable efficiencies (Supplementary Figures S4b and c). Using ChIP assay, we could demonstrate that RelA is recruited to Relb promoter within 30 min of TNF stimulation and then gradually removed (Figure 4a and Supplementary Figure S4d). While early chromatin recruitment was subtle, RelB robustly occupied the Relb promoter in Nfkb2−/− MEFs at 8 h post-TNF stimulation, corroborating the heightened late RelB DNA-binding activity observed in these cells.
Rewiring this autoregulatory control in our mathematical model, we could efficiently recapitulate progressive nuclear accumulation of the RelB:p50 dimer in Nfkb2−/− MEFs in response to TNF (Figure 4b). Computational simulations further predicted intact late RelB:p50 response in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs owing to autoregulatory control. Our EMSA confirmed gradual nuclear accumulation with strong RelB:p50 activity at 8 h post-TNF stimulation in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 4c) and ChIP analyses revealed recruitment of RelB to Relb promoter at this time point (Figure 4d and Supplementary Figure S4e). Finally, despite the absence of RelA, TNF-stimulated RelB mRNA synthesis in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 4e) that temporally coincided with TNF-induced RelB:p50 DNA-binding activity. Collectively, our study identified a novel positive autoregulatory loop, which perpetuates RelB:p50/NFκB activity during canonical TNF signaling (Figure 4f). Such autoregulatory RelB control generated NFκB DNA-binding activity despite inactivation of RelA. Our MEF-based analyses suggested that this autoregulatory loop is hardwired within the NFκB circuit and is triggered upon p100 depletion. We postulated that prolonged RelB:p50 containing NFκB response to TNF in p100-depleted HMCLs could be a consequence of autoregulatory control.
RelB:p50 dimer is sufficient for TNF-induced expression of NFκB target genes
Using genetically tractable MEF system, we investigated how RelB:p50 modulates TNF-induced expression of NF-κB target genes. To this end, we compared global gene expressions (see Materials and methods) in TNF-treated MEFs of the following genotypes, namely WT fibroblasts, which primarily elicits RelA:p50 activity, Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− cells, which exclusively activate RelB:p50, and control NFκB-deficient Rela−/−Relb−/−Rel−/− cells, which lack the expression of all three transcription-activating NFκB subunits RelA, RelB and cRel. Applying the k-median algorithm to our genome-scale data, we clustered genes induced in WT MEFs at 6 h post-TNF stimulation into seven subgroups (Figure 5a and Supplementary Table S1). Abrogated expression of ~65% of genes belonging to four clusters (cluster A–D) in Rela−/−Relb−/−Rel−/− cells reiterated a dominant role of NFκB in TNF-induced gene expression. Remarkably, TNF-stimulated gene expression was qualitatively intact in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs in three out of four NFκB-dependent clusters. Our quantitative reverse transcriptase–PCR analyses revealed that TNF induces expression of mRNAs encoding pro-inflammatory mediators, such as IP-10, MCP-1 and RANTES (Figure 5b), as well as pro-survival factors, including TRAF1, cIAP2 and cFLIP (Figure 5c), in WT MEFs, but not in Rela−/−Relb−/−Rel−/− MEFs. Inducible expression of these NFκB target genes was mostly preserved, and if anything was subtly enhanced, in Nfkb2−/− cells, which stimulates both RelA:p50 and RelB:p50 activity (Figures 5b and c). Intriguingly, TNF stimulation led to equivalent synthesis of these mRNAs, except for RANTES, in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figures 5b and c). shRNA-mediated depletion of RelB abrogated TNF-induced expressions of these genes in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 5d and Supplementary Figure S5a). However, TNF-induced expression of cFOS, whose transcription is regulated in an NFκB independent manner, remained unaltered upon RelB knockdown in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 5d and Supplementary Figure S5b). Finally, our ChIP analyses revealed that TNF stimulation indeed promotes recruitment of RelB, in addition to RelA, to promoters of genes encoding cFLIP and cIAP2 in Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 5e). Therefore, our gene expression study confirmed that RelB:p50 dimer activated by TNF in p100-deficient cells is capable of inducing expression of a wide spectrum of NFκB target genes, thereby largely circumventing the requirement of RelA. Furthermore, these results extended the possibility that TNF-induced RelB:p50 activity provides for the pro-survival NFκB transcription function in p100-depleted myeloma cells.
TNF induced RelB:p50/NFκB dimer suppresses apoptosis independent of RelA
TNF-induced pro-survival factors, such as TRAF1 and cFLIP, counteracts caspase activation in preventing apoptotic cell death.34 Sensitivity of Rela−/− MEFs to TNF-induced apoptosis underscored the importance of RelA/NFκB-driven pro-survival gene expressions in the cell-death pathway.35 Given capacity of the RelB:p50 dimer in stimulating expression of these pro-survival factors, we asked if alternate RelB/NFκB activity suppresses apoptosis in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs. As a control, we utilized Rela−/−Nfkb1−/− cells, which lack RelA as well as p50, thus resulting in the deficiency of both RelA:p50 and RelB:p50 dimers (Supplementary Figure S6a). Our immunoblot analyses revealed augmented processing of pro-Caspase-8 and pro-Caspase-3 as well as cleavage of PARP1 upon TNF treatment of Rela−/−Nfkb1−/− MEFs, but not in WT cells (Figure 6a). TNF stimulation of Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs led to minor change in abundance of pro-Caspases accompanied by only a subtle increase in cleaved Caspase-3 and PARP1. In cell-death assay, we could demonstrate that Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs are indeed resistant to TNF-induced death, while Rela−/− Nfkb1−/− cells are extremely susceptible (Figure 6b). Importantly, Nfkb2−/− MEFs were impervious to TNF-induced cell death. Our fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses validated that early apoptosis detected in Rela−/−Nfkb1−/− MEFs within 4 h of TNF treatment is essentially absent in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs as in WT cells (Figure 6c and Supplementary Figure S6b). Ablating RelB expression using shRNA, we confirmed that the RelB:p50 dimer is critical for preventing TNF activation of caspases in Rela−/−Nfkb2−/− MEFs (Figure 6d) and protecting these RelA-null cells from apoptosis (Figure 6e). Thus our investigation offered direct genetic evidence that RelB:p50/NFκB activation by TNF in p100-deficient cells is sufficient, and RelA is not required, to suppress the apoptotic cell death.
Autoregulatory RelB/NFκB pathway promotes pro-survival gene expressions in multiple myeloma
Our mechanistic studies involving various knockout cells illuminated that p100 deficiency provokes autoregulatory RelB:p50/NFκB activity, which can mediate pro-survival TNF functions. We argued that this mechanism accentuates drug resistance in myeloma. To examine this hypothesis, we first compared IκBα-immunoprecipitates derived from HMCLs for the presence of RelB. Corroborating fibroblast studies, our analyses revealed dominant RelB–IκBα interaction in unstimulated KMS28PE and JK6L cells those lack p100, but not in OciMy5 cells (Figure 7a). Furthermore, perpetuating RelB:p50 response to TNF in KMS28PE and JK6L cells (Figure 2a) temporally coincided with gradual accumulation of RelB mRNA (Figure 7b). TNF stimulated RelB mRNA synthesis (Figure 7c) as well as RelB:p50 DNA-binding activity (Figure 7d) independent of RelA in KMS28PE cells suggesting that autoregulatory RelB control prolongs NFκB response in p100-depleted HMCLs. Conversely, overexpression of a mutant version of p100 (p100S866A,S870A), which was resistant to NIK-mediated degradation,19 in KMS28PE cells led to a drastic reduction in TNF-induced RelB:p50 NFκB activity (Figure 7e and Supplementary Figure S7). Corroborating our observation that RelB:p50 may provide for pro-survival NFκB function, solitary RelB:p50 activation in the absence of RelA was sufficient for TNF-induced expression of NFκB target genes encoding TRAF1, cFLIP and Bcl2 in KMS28PE cells (Figure 7f). Consistently, shRNA-mediated depletion of RelB, which primarily constitutes the NFκB activity in KMS28PE cells at 8 h post-TNF stimulation, entirely abrogated late induction of these pro-survival factors (Figure 7f). Taken together, p100 depletion reinforced pro-survival TNF response in multiple myeloma by prolonging classical NFκB function via the autoregulatory RelB pathway. Functional redundancy with RelA:p50 dimer coupled to distinct dynamic control allowed RelB:p50 to instill a protracted drug-resistant state in HMCLs.
To further validate our mechanistic hypothesis, we examined gene-expression profile and clinical data of myeloma patients available on the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation database (themmrf.org). Our analyses revealed that Bcl2 and cFLIP mRNA levels were augmented in the patient group with high RelB mRNA expression as compared with those expressing RelB at a low level (Figure 7g). Moreover, RelB mRNA level was significantly elevated in the group of patients exhibiting progressive or stable disease or only partial response upon first-line therapy as compared with the group showing complete or stringent complete responses (Figure 7h). Given persistently elevated RelB mRNA expression was dependent on autoregulatory synthesis, we argue that the direct correlation of RelB level with pro-survival gene expressions and resistance to therapeutic intervention is consistent to a possible role of the autoregulatory RelB/NFκB pathway in disease pathogenesis of multiple myeloma.
Discussion
Activation of canonical NFκB signaling in myeloma cells by tumor microenvironment derived TNF has been implicated in environmental drug resistance. Recurrent gain-of-function mutations in the non-canonical NFκB module indicated its possible involvement in the resilience of myeloma cells to chemotherapeutic agents. We found that while TNF induces an early NFκB activity, mutational activation of the non-canonical module prolongs TNF-induced pro-survival NFκB response, albeit composed of the RelB:p50 dimer, in exacerbating TRAIL resistance (Figure 8).
Our quantitative analyses indicated that IκBα is a less-preferred interaction partner of RelB, which favors p100 binding (Supplementary Appendix Figures 2b and c). However, depletion of p100, owing to non-canonical mutations, altered the cellular homeostasis with RelB:p50 being sequestered by IκBα and consequently, induced upon TNF stimulation as an early NFκB activity (Figures 2, 3 and 7). Absence of p100 in mutant cells additionally triggered a late-acting RelB:p50/NFκB response, which was contingent upon autoregulatory Relb synthesis (Figures 2, 3, 4 and 8). IKK2 was shown to phosphorylate RelB at 6 h post-TNF stimulation that further weakened RelB–IκBα interaction.36 It has been suggested that ERK1, which is activated by TNF, also phosphorylates RelB in promoting its nuclear translocation.26 Implementing the delayed phosphorylation mechanism in our computational model explained that late-acting RelB:p50 dimer escaped this debilitated IκBα feedback to uninterruptedly synthesize RelB mRNA in cancerous cells.
In a pioneering study, Karin’s group earlier demonstrated that expression of cJun proto-oncogene is subjected to positive autoregulation.37 An autoregulatory loop connecting IRF4 and MYC was shown to perpetuate oncogenic gene expressions in multiple myeloma.38 Epigenetic changes associated with colon cancer were shown to trigger hypoxia-inducible factor-1α autoregulation.39 An autoregulatory circuit propagated T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia protein 1 (TAL1) activity in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.40 Except for Rela, genes encoding the NFκB subunits per se also bear κB sites at their promoters. In this study, we extended evidence for the involvement of autoregulatory NFκB control in neoplastic diseases. Genetic analyses and mathematical modeling studies substantiated that depletion of p100 in myeloma cells triggers this autoregulatory loop to promote perpetuating RelB:p50/NFκB response to TNF. Strikingly, this TNF-induced, persistent RelB:p50 activity was impervious to RelA inhibitions (Figures 4 and 7d). Our mechanistic investigation indicated that early RelB:p50 activation from IκBα-bound complex is critical for triggering this late-acting RelB:p50 response, particularly when RelA is inactivated.
It was shown that malignant plasma cells possess a low level of NIK-independent, constitutive RelB/NFκB activity. While this activity was initially implicated in expression of NFκB target genes,27 a recent investigation suggested that RelB:p52 suppresses expression of NFκB target pro-apoptotic gene Bim.26 Indeed, RelB was shown both to activate and inhibit physiological gene expressions from NFκB target promoters,31, 41, 42, 43, 44 and RelA, cRel or RelB containing NFκB heterodimers were shown to overlap in their DNA-binding specificity.45, 46 However, the perceived notion that RelA is obligatorily required for expression of Relb47 restricted genetic studies directly evaluating RelB mediated regulations of NFκB target genes in the absence of RelA. Our analyses provided unequivocal evidence that RelB:p50 dimer not only cooperates with RelA:p50 but transcription-activating function of RelB:p50 circumvents the requirement of RelA in mediating pro-survival TNF response in p100-depleted cells, including myeloma cells harboring non-canonical mutations (Figures 5, 6, 7). Although, we do not rule out that RelB, particularly in association with p52, functions as a transcriptional repressor in the basal state in HMCLs, our investigation indicated that TNF-induced RelB:p50 acts as a potent activator of pro-survival gene expressions.
Mutational activation of the non-canonical NFκB pathway modified TNF signaling to impart drug resistance in myeloma cells independent of the principal NFκB subunit RelA. Interestingly, these mutations did not act through typical p52 NFκB complexes, but depleted p100 to reposition RelB under IκBα control. Of note, myeloma-derived cells with enhanced NIK activity were shown to be sensitive to IKK2 inhibitors.22 Our study clarified that NIK depletes p100, while IKK2 induces pro-survival RelB:p50/NFκB response from IκBα-inhibited complex. Moreover, autoregulatory RelB:p50 activation by TNF assisted these cells develop autonomy from RelA/NFκB in producing a protracted drug-refractory state. It is thought that the non-canonical RelB/NFκB pathway transduces signal selectively from cell-differentiating cues, and TNF utilizes the canonical RelA/NFκB pathway. We noted that TNF-induced RelA is insufficient for imparting TRAIL resistance (Figures 1 and 2). Rather autoregulatory RelB control mediated precarious collaboration between widespread cell-intrinsic mutations in the non-canonical NFκB module and dynamical signaling induced by TNF in multiple myeloma. The proposed autoregulatory control is consistent to the previous finding demonstrating heightened RelB mRNA levels in myeloma patients harboring mutations in non-canonical NFκB module.22 Our observation that high RelB level is correlated with augmented expression of pro-survival factors and resistance of patients to therapy also indicated possible involvement of autoregulatory RelB control in multiple myeloma (Figure 7). In addition to genetic mutations, BAFF and APRIL also activate the non-canonical NFκB pathway in mature B-cells and myeloma cells.48 In this context, future studies ought to investigate the possible role of autoregulatory RelB control in transducing BAFF signal in processes requiring prolonged NFκB activity, such as B-cell differentiation and myeloma cell survival.
Our identification that the non-canonical pathway reinforces canonical TNF response through RelB:p50/NFκB dimer reiterates the importance of system-level understanding of pathway integration for designing therapeutic interventions. In sum, highly networked systems controlling functionally redundant transcription factors are also vulnerable to cancerous mutations, which may reverse the feedback control hardwired in the inflammatory circuit. Our results also indicate that acquisition of mutations those provoke autoregulatory activation of pro-survival transcription factors constitutes an important mechanism in environmental drug resistance.
Materials and methods
Cells and reagents
Wild-type or gene-deficient C57BL/6 mice were housed at NII and used in accordance with the IAEC guidelines. MEFs, immortalized using 3T3 protocol, were generated from E13.5 embryos, as described.32 HMCLs were a kind gift from Dr Michael Kuehl, NCI. Indicated transgenes were either constitutively expressed from MoMLV LTR promoter from pBabe.puro or inducibly expressed from an engineered promoter containing five tandem kappaB sites from HRS.puro retroviral construct. Retrovirus particle were generated from 293 T cells co-transfected with pCL-Eco.32 For gene transduction into human-derived myeloma cells, pseudotyped retrovirus particles were produced using Retro-X Universal Packaging System (Clonetech, Mountain View, CA, USA) from GP2-293 cells co-transfected with pBabe.puro construct and Ampho envelope vector (Clonetech). Following shRNA-expressing lentiviral particles (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) were used for knockdown in HMCLs: Rela#1-TRCN0000353629, Rela#2-TRCN000029875, Relb#1-TRCN0000280360, Relb#2-TRCN0000280361, Nfkb2#1-TRCN0000356047 and Nfkb2#2-TRCN0000356005, and control-SHC202V. For knockdown studies in fibroblasts, lentiviral constructs expressing control shRNA (#RHS4346) or RelB-shRNAs (RMM#4431-101264262 and RMM#4431-200408572) purchased from GE-Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA) were used for generating lentiviral particles.49
Biochemical analyses
MEFs and HMCLs stimulated using 1 and 10 ng/ml of TNF (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), respectively, were harvested, nuclear, cytoplasmic or whole-cell extracts were analyzed by EMSA, supershift analysis, immunoblotting or subjected to immunoprecipitation.50 Antibody against p50 (BB-AB0080) was from BioBharati Life Sciences (Kolkata, India). Antibodies against Caspase-8 (#4790), Caspase-3 (#9665) and PARP1 (#9542) were from CST (Danvers, MA, USA).
Gene-expression analyses
Total RNA was isolated from cells stimulated with 10 ng/ml of TNF and quantitative reverse transcriptase–PCR was conducted, as described,50 using cDNA synthesis kit from BioBharati. For microarray analysis, labeling, hybridization to Illumina MouseRef-8 v2.0 Expression BeadChip, data processing and quantile normalization were performed by Sandor Pvt Ltd (Hyderabad, India). Differential expression of genes between different genotypes were analyzed by k-median clustering implemented in the MEV program.51 The MIAME version of the microarray data is available on NCBI-GEO (accession GSE68615). For ChIP, 3 × 106 MEFs stimulated with 10 ng/ml of TNF were fixed with 2% formaldehyde, nuclei were isolated, sonicated and lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation using indicated antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Subsequent to reverse cross-linking, genomic DNA fragments were extracted from immunopellet and analyzed by qPCR using specific primers.
Cell-death studies
TNF-induced (1 ng/ml) cell death in MEFs was quantified at 18 h post-stimulation using crystal violet staining, as described.52 TRAIL-induced (100 ng/ml; Adipogen, San Diego, CA, USA) cell death in HMCLs was assessed in trypan blue dye exclusion assay. HMCLs were primed with 10 ng/ml of TNF. Apoptosis was scored at 4 h post-stimulation using annexin-V/FITC and propidium iodide (BD Biosciences) staining. Flow cytometry was performed using VERSE (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at NII Central facility with the help from A Das, NII, and data were analyzed using FlowJo.
Computational modeling and code availability
The NF-κB Systems Model v2.0 was developed based on previously published models,31, 50 refined using our experimental data and was simulated in Matlab. A detailed description including parameter values has been provided in Supplementary Appendix. Matlab codes are available upon request.
Statistical analysis
Error bars are shown as s.e.m. of 3–5 biological replicates, which was determined according to the standard practices for cell-culture-based analyses. Exact numbers of replicates for each experiment have been indicated in the legends of the corresponding figures. Statistical significance between groups was calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test and the P-values have been mentioned in the respective figures. For analyses of patients data obtained from Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Welch’s t-test was used.
References
Palumbo A, Anderson K . Medical progress multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1046–1060.
Lemke J, von Karstedt S, Zinngrebe J, Walczak H . Getting TRAIL back on track for cancer therapy. Cell Death Differ 2014; 21: 1350–1364.
Mitsiades CS, Treon SP, Mitsiades N, Shima Y, Richardson P, Schlossman R et al. TRAIL/Apo2L ligand selectively induces apoptosis and overcomes drug resistance in multiple myeloma: therapeutic applications. Blood 2001; 98: 795–804.
Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, Anderson KC, Treon SP . Intracellular regulation of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in human multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2002; 99: 2162–2171.
Lincz LF, Yeh TX, Spencer A . TRAIL-induced eradication of primary tumour cells from multiple myeloma patient bone marrows is not related to TRAIL receptor expression or prior chemotherapy. Leukemia 2001; 15: 1650–1657.
Dimberg LY, Anderson CK, Camidge R, Behbakht K, Thorburn A, Ford HL . On the TRAIL to successful cancer therapy? Predicting and counteracting resistance against TRAIL-based therapeutics. Oncogene 2013; 32: 1341–1350.
Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, Chauhan D, Richardson PG, Hideshima T et al. Biologic sequelae of nuclear factor-kappaB blockade in multiple myeloma: therapeutic applications. Blood 2002; 99: 4079–4086.
Perez LE, Parquet N, Shain K, Nimmanapalli R, Alsina M, Anasetti C et al. Bone marrow stroma confers resistance to Apo2 ligand/TRAIL in multiple myeloma in part by regulating c-FLIP. J Immunol 2008; 180: 1545–1555.
Rauert H, Stuhmer T, Bargou R, Wajant H, Siegmund D . TNFR1 and TNFR2 regulate the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in myeloma cells by multiple mechanisms. Cell Death Dis 2011; 2: e194.
Kawano Y, Moschetta M, Manier S, Glavey S, Gorgun GT, Roccaro AM et al. Targeting the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma. Immunol Rev 2015; 263: 160–172.
Jurisic V, Colovic M . Correlation of sera TNF-alpha with percentage of bone marrow plasma cells, LDH, beta2-microglobulin, and clinical stage in multiple myeloma. Med Oncol 2002; 19: 133–139.
Jourdan M, Tarte K, Legouffe E, Brochier J, Rossi JF, Klein B . Tumor necrosis factor is a survival and proliferation factor for human myeloma cells. Eur Cytokine Netw 1999; 10: 65–70.
Wang XS, Shi Q, Williams LA, Shah ND, Mendoza TR, Cohen EN et al. Longitudinal analysis of patient-reported symptoms post-autologous stem cell transplant and their relationship to inflammation in patients with multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2015; 56: 1335–1341.
Latif T, Chauhan N, Khan R, Moran A, Usmani SZ . Thalidomide and its analogues in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Exp Hematol Oncol 2012; 1: 27.
Geng C, Hou J, Zhao Y, Ke X, Wang Z, Qiu L et al. A multicenter, open-label phase II study of recombinant CPT (Circularly Permuted TRAIL) plus thalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol 2014; 89: 1037–1042.
Hoffmann A, Baltimore D . Circuitry of nuclear factor kappaB signaling. Immunol Rev 2006; 210: 171–186.
Dai Y, Pei XY, Rahmani M, Conrad DH, Dent P, Grant S . Interruption of the NF-kappaB pathway by Bay 11-7082 promotes UCN-01-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in human multiple myeloma cells. Blood 2004; 103: 2761–2770.
Keats JJ, Fonseca R, Chesi M, Schop R, Baker A, Chng WJ et al. Promiscuous mutations activate the noncanonical NF-kappaB pathway in multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell 2007; 12: 131–144.
Sun SC . The noncanonical NF-kappaB pathway. Immunol Rev 2012; 246: 125–140.
Annunziata CM, Stavnes HT, Kleinberg L, Berner A, Hernandez LF, Birrer MJ et al. Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer. Cancer 2010; 116: 3276–3284.
Thu YM, Richmond A . NF-kappaB inducing kinase: a key regulator in the immune system and in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2010; 21: 213–226.
Annunziata CM, Davis RE, Demchenko Y, Bellamy W, Gabrea A, Zhan F et al. Frequent engagement of the classical and alternative NF-kappaB pathways by diverse genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma. Cancer Cell 2007; 12: 115–130.
Chapman MA, Lawrence MS, Keats JJ, Cibulskis K, Sougnez C, Schinzel AC et al. Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma. Nature 2011; 471: 467–472.
Migliazza A, Lombardi L, Rocchi M, Trecca D, Chang CC, Antonacci R et al. Heterogeneous chromosomal aberrations generate 3' truncations of the NFKB2/lyt-10 gene in lymphoid malignancies. Blood 1994; 84: 3850–3860.
Demchenko YN, Glebov OK, Zingone A, Keats JJ, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM . Classical and/or alternative NF-kappaB pathway activation in multiple myeloma. Blood 2010; 115: 3541–3552.
Vallabhapurapu SD, Noothi SK, Pullum DA, Lawrie CH, Pallapati R, Potluri V et al. Transcriptional repression by the HDAC4-RelB-p52 complex regulates multiple myeloma survival and growth. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8428.
Cormier F, Monjanel H, Fabre C, Billot K, Sapharikas E, Chereau F et al. Frequent engagement of RelB activation is critical for cell survival in multiple myeloma. PLoS One 2013; 8: e59127.
Demchenko YN, Brents LA, Li Z, Bergsagel LP, McGee LR, Kuehl MW . Novel inhibitors are cytotoxic for myeloma cells with NFkB inducing kinase-dependent activation of NFkB. Oncotarget 2014; 5: 4554–4566.
Busino L, Millman SE, Scotto L, Kyratsous CA, Basrur V, O'Connor O et al. Fbxw7alpha- and GSK3-mediated degradation of p100 is a pro-survival mechanism in multiple myeloma. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 14: 375–385.
Almaden JV, Tsui R, Liu YC, Birnbaum H, Shokhirev MN, Ngo KA et al. A pathway switch directs BAFF signaling to distinct NFkappaB transcription factors in maturing and proliferating B cells. Cell Rep 2014; 9: 2098–2111.
Shih VF, Davis-Turak J, Macal M, Huang JQ, Ponomarenko J, Kearns JD et al. Control of RelB during dendritic cell activation integrates canonical and noncanonical NF-kappaB pathways. Nat Immunol 2012; 13: 1162–1170.
Basak S, Shih VF, Hoffmann A . Generation and activation of multiple dimeric transcription factors within the NF-kappaB signaling system. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28: 3139–3150.
Derudder E, Dejardin E, Pritchard LL, Green DR, Korner M, Baud V . RelB/p50 dimers are differentially regulated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and lymphotoxin-beta receptor activation: critical roles for p100. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 23278–23284.
Baud V, Karin M . Is NF-kappaB a good target for cancer therapy? Hopes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Drug Disc 2009; 8: 33–40.
Beg AA, Baltimore D . An essential role for NF-kappaB in preventing TNF-alpha-induced cell death. Science 1996; 274: 782–784.
Authier H, Billot K, Derudder E, Bordereaux D, Riviere P, Rodrigues-Ferreira S et al. IKK phosphorylates RelB to modulate its promoter specificity and promote fibroblast migration downstream of TNF receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 14794–14799.
Angel P, Hattori K, Smeal T, Karin M . The jun proto-oncogene is positively autoregulated by its product, Jun/AP-1. Cell 1988; 55: 875–885.
Shaffer AL, Emre NC, Lamy L, Ngo VN, Wright G, Xiao W et al. IRF4 addiction in multiple myeloma. Nature 2008; 454: 226–231.
Koslowski M, Luxemburger U, Tureci O, Sahin U . Tumor-associated CpG demethylation augments hypoxia-induced effects by positive autoregulation of HIF-1alpha. Oncogene 2011; 30: 876–882.
Sanda T, Lawton LN, Barrasa MI, Fan ZP, Kohlhammer H, Gutierrez A et al. Core transcriptional regulatory circuit controlled by the TAL1 complex in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell 2012; 22: 209–221.
Bonizzi G, Bebien M, Otero DC, Johnson-Vroom KE, Cao Y, Vu D et al. Activation of IKKalpha target genes depends on recognition of specific kappaB binding sites by RelB:p52 dimers. EMBO J 2004; 23: 4202–4210.
Saccani S, Pantano S, Natoli G . Modulation of NF-kappaB activity by exchange of dimers. Mol Cell 2003; 11: 1563–1574.
Weih F, Carrasco D, Durham SK, Barton DS, Rizzo CA, Ryseck RP et al. Multiorgan inflammation and hematopoietic abnormalities in mice with a targeted disruption of RelB, a member of the NF-kappa B/Rel family. Cell 1995; 80: 331–340.
Chen X, El Gazzar M, Yoza BK, McCall CE . The NF-kappaB factor RelB and histone H3 lysine methyltransferase G9a directly interact to generate epigenetic silencing in endotoxin tolerance. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 27857–27865.
Siggers T, Chang AB, Teixeira A, Wong D, Williams KJ, Ahmed B et al. Principles of dimer-specific gene regulation revealed by a comprehensive characterization of NF-kappaB family DNA binding. Nat Immunol 2012; 13: 95–102.
Zhao B, Barrera LA, Ersing I, Willox B, Schmidt SC, Greenfeld H et al. The NF-kappaB genomic landscape in lymphoblastoid B cells. Cell Rep 2014; 8: 1595–1606.
Basak S, Hoffmann A . Crosstalk via the NF-kappaB signaling system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2008; 19: 187–197.
Hengeveld PJ, Kersten MJ . B-cell activating factor in the pathophysiology of multiple myeloma: a target for therapy? Blood Cancer J 2015; 5: e282.
Basak S, Kim H, Kearns JD, Tergaonkar V, O'Dea E, Werner SL et al. A fourth IkappaB protein within the NF-kappaB signaling module. Cell 2007; 128: 369–381.
Banoth B, Chatterjee B, Vijayaragavan B, Prasad MV, Roy P, Basak S . Stimulus-selective crosstalk the NF-kappaB signaling system reinforces innate immune response to alleviate gut infection. Elife 2015; 4: e05648.
Saeed AI, Bhagabati NK, Braisted JC, Liang W, Sharov V, Howe EA et al. TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol 2006; 411: 134–193.
Zong WX, Bash J, Gelinas C . Rel blocks both anti-Fas- and TNF alpha-induced apoptosis and an intact Rel transactivation domain is essential for this effect. Cell Death Differ 1998; 5: 963–972.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Ranjan Sen, NIH, and Anna George, NII, for critical reading and constructive suggestions. We also thank Michael Kuehl, NCI, for providing us HMCLs and Dr Shao Cong Sun, University of Texas for p100S866A,S870A construct. We thank V Kumar, MVR Prasad, J Sanghani and S Goel for technical assistance. Multiple myeloma-related research was funded by SERB, Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India (EMR/2015/000658). Research in PI’s laboratory is funded by an intermediate fellowship (500094/Z/09/Z) to SB from Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance and NII-Core. PR and BB thank CSIR, and BC and TM thank UGC for research fellowships.
Author contributions
PR, TM, BV and BB did wet lab experiments, BC, carried out in silico analyses, SB, supervised research and wrote the manuscript with PR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Oncogene website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, P., Mukherjee, T., Chatterjee, B. et al. Non-canonical NFκB mutations reinforce pro-survival TNF response in multiple myeloma through an autoregulatory RelB:p50 NFκB pathway. Oncogene 36, 1417–1429 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2016.309
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2016.309
This article is cited by
-
COX2 confers bone marrow stromal cells to promoting TNFα/TNFR1β-mediated myeloma cell growth and adhesion
Cellular Oncology (2021)
-
RelB sustains endocrine resistant malignancy: an insight of noncanonical NF-κB pathway into breast Cancer progression
Cell Communication and Signaling (2020)
-
Novel complementary antitumour effects of celastrol and metformin by targeting IκBκB, apoptosis and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in diethylnitrosamine-induced murine hepatocarcinogenesis
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2020)
-
Role of NF-kappaB2-p100 in regulatory T cell homeostasis and activation
Scientific Reports (2019)