Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Genomic segmental duplications on the basis of the t(9;22) rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia

Abstract

A crucial role of segmental duplications (SDs) of the human genome has been shown in chromosomal rearrangements associated with several genomic disorders. Limited knowledge is yet available on the molecular processes resulting in chromosomal rearrangements in tumors. The t(9;22)(q34;q11) rearrangement causing the 5′BCR/3′ABL gene formation has been detected in more than 90% of cases with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In 10–18% of patients with CML, genomic deletions were detected on der(9) chromosome next to translocation breakpoints. The molecular mechanism triggering the t(9;22) and deletions on der(9) is still speculative. Here we report a molecular cytogenetic analysis of a large series of patients with CML with der(9) deletions, revealing an evident breakpoint clustering in two regions located proximally to ABL and distally to BCR, containing an interchromosomal duplication block (SD_9/22). The deletions breakpoints distribution appeared to be strictly related to the distance from the SD_9/22. Moreover, bioinformatic analyses of the regions surrounding the SD_9/22 revealed a high Alu frequency and a poor gene density, reflecting genomic instability and susceptibility to rearrangements. On the basis of our results, we propose a three-step model for t(9;22) formation consisting of alignment of chromosomes 9 and 22 mediated by SD_9/22, spontaneous chromosome breakages and misjoining of DNA broken ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albano F, Anelli L, Zagaria A, Archidiacono N, Liso V, Specchia G et al. (2007). ‘Home-brew’ FISH assay shows higher efficiency than BCR-ABL dual color, dual fusion probe in detecting microdeletions and complex rearrangements associated with t(9;22) in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 174: 121–126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey JA, Eichler EE . (2006). Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat Rev Genet 7: 552–564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbouti A, Stankiewicz P, Nusbaum C, Cuomo C, Cook A, Hoglund M et al. (2004). The breakpoint region of the most common isochromosome, i(17q), in human neoplasia is characterized by a complex genomic architecture with large, palindromic, low-copy repeats. Am J Hum Genet 74: 1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darai-Ramqvist E, Sandlund A, Muller S, Klein G, Imreh S, Kost-Alimova M . (2008). Segmental duplications and evolutionary plasticity at tumor chromosome break-prone regions. Genome Res 18: 370–379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott B, Jasin M . (2002). Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci 59: 373–385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fourouclas N, Campbell PJ, Bench AJ, Swanton S, Baxter EJ, Huntly BJ et al. (2006). Size matters: the prognostic implications of large and small deletions of the derivative 9 chromosome in chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 91: 952–955.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibcus JH, Kok K, Menkema L, Hermsen MA, Mastik M, Kluin PM et al. (2007). High-resolution mapping identifies a commonly amplified 11q13.3 region containing multiple genes flanked by segmental duplications. Hum Genet 121: 187–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gu W, Zhang F, Lupski JR . (2008). Mechanisms for human genomic rearrangements. Pathogenetics 1: 4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huntly BJ, Reid AG, Bench AJ, Campbell LJ, Telford N, Shepherd P et al. (2001). Deletions of the derivative chromosome 9 occur at the time of the Philadelphia translocation and provide a powerful and independent prognostic indicator in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 98: 1732–1738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim PM, Lam HY, Urban AE, Korbel JO, Affourtit J, Grubert F et al. (2008). Analysis of copy number variants and segmental duplications in the human genome: evidence for a change in the process of formation in recent evolutionary history. Genome Res 18: 1865–1874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kolomietz E, Al-Maghrabi J, Brennan S, Karaskova J, Minkin S, Lipton J et al. (2001). Primary chromosomal rearrangements of leukemia are frequently accompanied by extensive submicroscopic deletions and may lead to altered prognosis. Blood 97: 3581–3588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolomietz E, Marrano P, Yee K, Thai B, Braude I, Kolomietz A et al. (2003). Quantitative PCR identifies a minimal deleted region of 120 kb extending from the Philadelphia chromosome ABL translocation breakpoint in chronic myeloid leukemia with poor outcome. Leukemia 17: 1313–1323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kreil S, Pfirrmann M, Haferlach C, Waghorn K, Chase A, Hehlmann R et al. (2007). Heterogeneous prognostic impact of derivative chromosome 9 deletions in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 110: 1283–1290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter P, Tang CJ, Call K, Hermanson G, Evans GA, Housman D et al. (1990). High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridization with cosmid clones. Science 247: 64–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Litz CE, McClure JS, Copenhaver CM, Brunning RD . (1993). Duplication of small segments within the major breakpoint cluster region in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 81: 1567–1572.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lomiento M, Jiang Z, D'Addabbo P, Eichler EE, Rocchi M . (2008). Evolutionary-new centromeres preferentially emerge within gene deserts. Genome Biol 9: R173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mefford HC, Eichler EE . (2009). Duplication hotspots, rare genomic disorders, and common disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19: 196–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saglio G, Storlazzi CT, Giugliano E, Surace C, Anelli L, Rege-Cambrin G et al. (2002). A 76-kb duplicon maps close to the BCR gene on chromosome 22 and the ABL gene on chromosome 9: possible involvement in the genesis of the Philadelphia chromosome translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 9882–9887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp AJ, Hansen S, Selzer RR, Cheng Z, Regan R, Hurst JA et al. (2006). Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome. Nat Genet 38: 1038–1042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair PB, Nacheva EP, Leversha M, Telford N, Chang J, Reid A et al. (2000). Large deletions at the t(9;22) breakpoint are common and may identify a poor-prognosis subgroup of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 95: 738–743.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Specchia G, Albano F, Anelli L, Storlazzi CT, Zagaria A, Liso A et al. (2004). Derivative chromosome 9 deletions in chronic myeloid leukemia are associated with loss of tumor suppressor genes. Leuk Lymphoma 45: 689–694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storlazzi CT, Specchia G, Anelli L, Albano F, Pastore D, Zagaria A et al. (2002). Breakpoint characterization of der(9) deletions in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 35: 271–276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz de Campos MG, Montesano FT, Rodrigues MM, Chauffaille Mde L . (2007). Clinical implications of der(9q) deletions detected through dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 178: 49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yatsenko SA, Brundage EK, Roney EK, Cheung SW, Chinault AC, Lupski JR . (2009). Molecular mechanisms for subtelomeric rearrangements associated with the 9q34.3 microdeletion syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 18: 1924–1936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms MVC Pragnell for language revision of the paper. The financial support of Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie (AIL)-BARI is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F Albano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Oncogene website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albano, F., Anelli, L., Zagaria, A. et al. Genomic segmental duplications on the basis of the t(9;22) rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia. Oncogene 29, 2509–2516 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.524

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.524

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links