Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Doing more with less in bacterial DNA repair

Organisms such as yeast and humans are capable of both nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR), but bacteria have typically been assumed to be capable only of HR. A recent study shows that mycobacteria accomplish NHEJ using just two proteins (homologs of the eukaryotic Ku and DNA ligase IV), whereas eukaryotes require many factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The process of nonhomologous end-joining in eukaryotes and prokaryotes is similar, but remarkably, prokaryotes accomplish these multiple steps with only two proteins.

References

  1. Della, M. et al. Science 306, 683–685 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Critchlow, S.E. & Jackson, S.P. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 394–398 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roth, D.B. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 656–666 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aravind, L. & Koonin, E.V. Genome Res. 11, 1365–1374 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Doherty, A.J., Jackson, S.P. & Weller, G.R. FEBS Lett. 500, 186–188 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weller, G.R. et al. Science 297, 1686–1689 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arezi, B. & Kuchta, R.D. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 572–576 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nick McElhinny, S.A. & Ramsden, D.A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2309–2315 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, S. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24323–24330 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weller, G.R. & Doherty, A.J. FEBS Lett. 505, 340–342 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Downs, J.A., Lowndes, N.F. & Jackson, S.P. Nature 408, 1001–1004 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel, R. et al. J. Virol. 78, 8573–8581 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, L. et al. EMBO J. 20, 3272–3281 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gong, C., Martins, A., Bongiorno, P., Glickman, M. & Shuman, S. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 20594–20606 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitman, W.B., Coleman, D.C. & Wiebe, W.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6578–6583 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weller, G., Brandt, V. & Roth, D. Doing more with less in bacterial DNA repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11, 1158–1159 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1204-1158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1204-1158

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing