Abstract
Through the development of a procedure to measure when hydrogen bonds form under two-state folding conditions, α-helices have been determined to form proportionally to denaturant-sensitive surface area buried in the transition state. Previous experiments assessing H/D isotope effects are applied to various model proteins, including λ and Arc repressor variants, a coiled coil domain, cytochrome c, colicin immunity protein 7, proteins L and G, acylphosphatase, chymotrypsin inhibitor II and a Src SH3 domain. The change in free energy accompanied by backbone deuteration is highly correlated to secondary structure composition when hydrogen bonds are divided into two classes. The number of helical hydrogen bonds correlates with an average equilibrium isotope effect of 8.6 ± 0.9 cal mol−1 site−1. However, β-sheet and long-range hydrogen bonds have little isotope effect. The kinetic isotope effects support our hypothesis that, for helical proteins, hydrophobic association cannot be separated from helix formation in the transition state. Therefore, folding models that describe an incremental build-up of structure in which hydrophobic burial and hydrogen bond formation occur commensurately are more consistent with the data than are models that posit the extensive formation of one quantity before the other.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Northrop, D.B. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 103–131 (1981).
Schowen, K.B. & Schowen, R.L. Methods Enzymol. 87, 551–606 (1982).
Cleland, W.W. Methods Enzymol. 249, 341–373 (1995).
Itzhaki, L.S. & Evans, P.A. Protein Sci. 5, 140–146 (1996).
Parker, M.J. & Clarke, A.R. Biochemistry 36, 5786–5794 (1997).
Kentsis, A. & Sosnick, T.R. Biochemistry 37, 14613–14622 (1998).
Krantz, B.A., Moran, L.B., Kentsis, A. & Sosnick, T.R. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 62–71 (2000).
Wade, D. Chem. Biol. Interact. 117, 191–217 (1999).
Jancso, G.V.H. & Alexander, W. Chem. Rev. 74, 689–719 (1974).
Makhatadze, G.I., Clore, G.M. & Gronenborn, A.M. Nature Struct. Biol. 2, 852–855 (1995).
Connelly, G.P., Bai, Y., Jeng, M.-F., Mayne, L. & Englander, S.W. Proteins 17, 87–92 (1993).
Matthews, C.R. Methods Enzymol. 154, 498–511 (1987).
Krantz, B.A. & Sosnick, T.R. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 1042–1047. (2001).
Moran, L.B., Schneider, J.P., Kentsis, A., Reddy, G.A. & Sosnick, T.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10699–10704 (1999).
Waldburger, C.D., Jonsson, T. & Sauer, R.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2629–2634 (1996).
Srivastava, A.K. & Sauer, R.T. Biochemistry 39, 8308–8314 (2000).
Munoz, V. & Serrano, L. Biopolymers 41, 495–509 (1997).
Burton, R.E., Huang, G.S., Daugherty, M.A., Calderone, T.L. & Oas, T.G. Nature Struct. Biol. 4, 305–310 (1997).
Capaldi, A.P., Kleanthous, C. & Radford, S.E. Nature Struct. Biol. 9, 209–216 (2002).
Taddei, N. et al. J. Mol. Biol. 300, 633–647 (2000).
Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E. & Fersht, A.R. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 260–288 (1995).
McCallister, E.L., Alm, E. & Baker, D. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 669–673 (2000).
Bulaj, G. & Goldenberg, D.P. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 326–330 (2001).
Guo, Z., Brooks, C.L. III & Boczko, E.M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 10161–10166 (1997).
Honig, B. & Yang, A.S. Adv. Protein. Chem. 46, 27–58 (1995).
Durr, E., Jelesarov, I. & Bosshard, H.R. Biochemistry 38, 870–880 (1999).
Bai, Y., Sosnick, T.R., Mayne, L. & Englander, S.W. Science 269, 192–197 (1995).
Chamberlain, A.K., Handel, T.M. & Marqusee, S. Nature Struct. Biol. 3, 782–787 (1996).
Sosnick, T.R., Mayne, L., Hiller, R. & Englander, S.W. Peptide and Protein Folding Workshop (ed. DeGrado, W.F.) 52–80 (International Business Communications, Philadelphia; 1995).
Sosnick, T.R., Mayne, L. & Englander, S.W. Proteins 24, 413–426 (1996).
Plaxco, K.W., Simons, K.T. & Baker, D. J. Mol. Biol. 277, 985–994 (1998).
Fernández, A. J. Chem. Phys. 114, 2489–2502 (2001).
Viguera, A.R., Martinez, J.C., Filimonov, V.V., Mateo, P.L. & Serrano, L. Biochemistry 33, 2142–2150 (1994).
Nauli, S., Kuhlman, B. & Baker, D. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 602–605 (2001).
Bai, Y., Milne, J.S., Mayne, L. & Englander, S.W. Proteins 17, 75–86 (1993).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Fernandez, X. Fang, S.W. Englander, N. Kallenbach, C. Brooks, R.S. Berry, T. Pan and our group members for numerous enlightening discussions. This work was supported by grants from the NIH and The Packard Foundation Interdisciplinary Science Program (T.R.S., P. Thiyagarajan, S. Berry, D. Lynn and S. Meredith).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krantz, B., Srivastava, A., Nauli, S. et al. Understanding protein hydrogen bond formation with kinetic H/D amide isotope effects. Nat Struct Mol Biol 9, 458–463 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb794
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb794