Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Prostate cancer

Effects of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on oncological outcome

The prognostic implications of a tertiary component of Gleason pattern 5 cancer at radical prostatectomy remain incompletely understood. A newly published study highlights the relationship between tertiary pattern 5 cancer, other risk factors and clinical outcomes. Authors propose a prognostic model to identify patients with the greatest need for adjuvant therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bostwick, D. G. & Cheng, L. Urologic surgical pathology 3rd edn (Elsevier/Saunders, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lucca, I. et al. Validation of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer as an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence and development of a prognostic model. Urol. Oncol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.08.011.

  3. Montironi, R. et al. Original Gleason system versus 2005 ISUP modified Gleason system: the importance of indicating which system is used in the patient's pathology and clinical reports. Eur. Urol. 58, 369–373 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, L. et al. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 2911–2917 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson, W. et al. Gleason pattern 5 is the strongest pathologic predictor of recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-specific death in patients receiving salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy. Cancer 119, 3287–3294 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adam, M. et al. A tertiary Gleason pattern in the prostatectomy specimen and its association with adverse outcome after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 192, 97–102 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hattab, E. M., Koch, M. O., Eble, J. N., Lin, H. & Cheng, L. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma. J. Urol. 175, 1695–1699 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Whittemore, D. E. et al. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens. J. Urol. 179, 516–522 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sim, H. G. et al. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason 7 prostate cancer predicts pathological stage and biochemical recurrence. J. Urol. 179, 1775–1779 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, L., Davidson, D. D., Lin, H. & Koch, M. O. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 predicts survival after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 110, 1967–1972 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williamson, S., Cheng, L. Effects of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on oncological outcome. Nat Rev Urol 12, 188–189 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.370

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.370

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing