Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Small renal masses

Is LESS partial nephrectomy feasible for most urologists?

Partial nephrectomy has become the standard of care for small renal masses, with minimally-invasive techniques such as laparoscopic, robotic-assisted and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) becoming increasingly popular. However, the complexity of the procedure generates uncertainty as to whether successful outcomes of LESS partial nephrectomy from large-volume centres can be translated into smaller urology practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Campbell, S. C. et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J. Urol. 182, 1271–1279 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, R. H. et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 179, 468–472 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Greco, F. et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional outcome analysis. Eur. Urol. 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.025.

  4. Bylund, J. R. et al. Association of tumor size, location, R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and centrality index score with perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function. J. Urol. 188, 1684–1689 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, R. H. et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 58, 340–345 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanagho, Y. S. et al. Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: initial Washington University experience. J. Endourol. 26, 1284–1289 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan, X. et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 62, 601–612 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanagho, Y. S., Bhayani, S. B. & Figenshau, R. S. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in contemporary practice. Front. Oncol. 2, 213 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haber, G. P. et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes. Eur. Urol. 49, 660–665 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanagho, Y. S. et al. Perioperative Complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers. Urology 81, 573–580 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay D. Raman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, YK., Raman, J. Is LESS partial nephrectomy feasible for most urologists?. Nat Rev Urol 10, 260–261 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.54

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.54

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer