Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Prostate cancer

Reducing overtreatment: active surveillance in low-risk disease

Prostate cancer screening often detects indolent cancers—defined as those which would never cause morbidity or mortality if left undetected and untreated. Unnecessary treatment of indolent cancer is a problem associated with this 'overdetection'. Active surveillance is a management strategy for low-risk cancers which can decrease the overtreatment burden.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Andriole, G. L. et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1310–1319 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schröder, F. H. et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1320–1328 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hugosson, J. et al. Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncol. 11, 725–732 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, P. R., Whitson, J. M. & Cooperberg, M. R. Serum prostate-specific antigen for the early detection of prostate cancer: always, never, or only sometimes? J. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5308.

  5. Loeb, S. et al. What is the true number needed to screen and treat to save a life with prostate-specific antigen testing? J. Clin. Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.30.6373.

  6. Dall'Era, M. A. et al. Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort. Cancer 112, 2664–2670 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klotz, L. et al. Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 126–131 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes, J. H. et al. Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: a decision analysis. JAMA 304, 2373–2380 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooperberg, M. R. et al. Outcomes of active surveillance for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 228–234 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleshner, N. et al. Delay in the progression of low-risk prostate cancer: rationale and design of the Reduction by Dutasteride of Clinical Progression Events in Expectant Management (REDEEM) trial. Contemp. Clin. Trials 28, 763–769 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared M. Whitson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P. R. Carroll declares that he acts as a consultant for Steba Biotech and Myriad Pharmaceuticals, has received Speaker's Bureau honararia from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and receives grant support from Abbott Laboratories. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitson, J., Porten, S. & Carroll, P. Reducing overtreatment: active surveillance in low-risk disease. Nat Rev Urol 8, 124–125 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer