Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Surgery

Laparoscopic prostatectomy: learning curve and cancer control

Greater surgeon experience is associated with lower recurrence rates following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. A new study shows that the learning curve for this procedure is slower than that for open surgery, and highlights the challenges of developing the unique skills that are required to master each technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Learning curves for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

References

  1. Guillonneau, B., Cathelineau, X., Barret, E., Rozet, F. & Vallancien, G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions [French]. Presse Med. 27, 1570–1574 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ficarra, V. et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol. 55, 1037–1063 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vickers, A. J. et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 10, 475–480 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Vickers, A. J. et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 99, 1171–1177 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Subramonian, K., DeSylva, S., Bishai, P., Thompson, P. & Muir, G. Acquiring surgical skills: a comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery. Eur. Urol. 45, 346–351 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prasad, S. M., Maniar, H. S., Soper, N. J., Damiano, R. J. & Klingensmith, M. E. The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am. J. Surg. 183, 702–707 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Menon, M. et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J. Urol. 168, 945–949 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shalhav, A., Dabagia, M. D., Wagner, T. T., Koch, M. O. & Lingeman, J. E. Training postgraduate urologists in laparoscopic surgery: the current challenge. J. Urol. 167, 2135–2137 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, J. A. & Sajadi, K. P. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: six months of fellowship training doesn't prevent the learning curve when incorporating into a lower volume practice. Urol. Oncol. 27, 144–148 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark L. Gonzalgo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Mark L. Gonzalgo declares that he has received honoraria for participating in a speakers' bureau organized by Intuitive Surgical. Steven L. Chang declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, S., Gonzalgo, M. Laparoscopic prostatectomy: learning curve and cancer control. Nat Rev Urol 6, 361–362 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.107

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing