Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Cardiovascular disease

Is CABG really better than PCI in dialysis patients?

A new study by Chang et al. reports that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be preferable to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multivessel coronary revascularization in appropriately selected patients on maintenance dialysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Chang, T. I. et al. Multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in ESRD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 2042–2049 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng, H. et al. Meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with end-stage renal disease. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs360.

  3. Chang, T. I. & Winkelmayer, W. C. Comparative effectiveness research: what is it and why do we need it in nephrology. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27, 2156–2161 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stel, V. S., Dekker, F. W., Zoccali, C. & Jager, K. J. Instrumental variable analysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs310.

  5. Sunagawa, G. et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 89, 1896–1900 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hlatky, M. A. et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet 373, 1190–1197 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Wanner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wanner, C., Jager, K. Is CABG really better than PCI in dialysis patients?. Nat Rev Nephrol 9, 197–198 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2013.41

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2013.41

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing