Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Elderly patients with CKD—dilemmas in dialysis therapy and vascular access

Nature Reviews Nephrology volume 10, pages 116–122 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Key Points

  • Management of chronic kidney disease in elderly patients is complex

  • Planning for renal replacement therapy and dialysis vascular access requires evaluation of comorbidities and quality of life

  • Selection of the ideal vascular access for an elderly patient requires pre-operative vessel mapping and consideration of vascular biology, the patient's ability to function independently and their anticipated life expectancy

  • Ethical issues, optimal timing of vascular access creation and predicting the outcomes of various types of permanent access remain challenging

Abstract

The population of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is growing rapidly worldwide. The high prevalence of comorbidities, limited life expectancy and complex quality of life issues associated with this population pose substantial challenges for clinicians in terms of clinical decision-making and providing optimal care. The first dilemma encountered in the management of an elderly patient with ESRD is deciding whether to initiate renal replacement therapy and, if so, selecting the most-suitable dialysis modality. Planning vascular access for haemodialysis is associated with additional challenges. Several clinical practice guidelines recommend an arteriovenous fistula, rather than a central venous catheter or arteriovenous graft, as the preferred access for maintenance haemodialysis therapy. However, whether this recommendation is applicable to elderly patients with ESRD and a limited life expectancy is unclear. Selection and planning of the most appropriate vascular access for an elderly patient with ESRD requires careful consideration of several factors and ultimately should lead to an improvement in the patient's quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Complex decision planning process for elderly patients with ESRD.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collins, A. J. et al. US Renal Data System 2012 Annual Data Report. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 61 (Suppl. 1), A7 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, E. A. & Johansson, L. Epidemiology and management of end-stage renal disease in the elderly. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 7, 591–598 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prakash, S. & O'Hare, A. M. Interaction of aging and chronic kidney disease. Semin. Nephrol. 29, 497–503 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurella, M., Covinsky, K. E., Collins, A. J. & Chertow, G. M. Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 146, 177–183 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, R. M. & Zeidel, M. L. Dialysis in frail elders—a role for palliative care. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1597–1598 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carson, R. C., Juszczak, M., Davenport, A. & Burns, A. Is maximum conservative management an equivalent treatment option to dialysis for elderly patients with significant comorbid disease? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 1611–1619 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Davison, S. N. Integrating palliative care for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: recent advances, remaining challenges. J. Palliat. Care 27, 53–61 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canaud, B. et al. Clinical practices and outcomes in elderly hemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 1651–1662 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamura, M. K., Tan, J. C. & O'Hare, A. M. Optimizing renal replacement therapy in older adults: a framework for making individualized decisions. Kidney Int. 82, 261–269 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Canadian organ replacement register annual report. Treatment of end stage organ failure in Canada, 2000 to 2009 [online], (2011).

  11. DeSilva, R. N. et al. Fistula first is not always the best strategy for the elderly. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 24, 1297–1304 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Moosa, M. R. & Kidd, M. The dangers of rationing dialysis treatment: the dilemma facing a developing country. Kidney Int. 70, 1107–1114 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rehman, R., Schmidt, R. J. & Moss, A. H. Ethical and legal obligation to avoid long-term tunneled catheter access. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 4, 456–460 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quinn, R. R. et al. The Vascular Access Questionnaire: assessing patient-reported views of vascular access. J. Vasc. Access 9, 122–128 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xi, W. et al. Patient attitudes towards the arteriovenous fistula: a qualitative study on vascular access decision making. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 3302–3308 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leermakers, J. J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of vascular access for haemodialysis: arteriovenous fistulas versus arteriovenous grafts. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 45, 84–92 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xue, H., Lacson, E. Jr, Wang, W., Curhan, G. C. & Brunelli, S. M. Choice of vascular access among incident hemodialysis patients: a decision and cost-utility analysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 5, 2289–2296 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosas, S. E. & Feldman, H. I. Synthetic vascular hemodialysis access versus native arteriovenous fistula: a cost-utility analysis. Ann. Surg. 255, 181–186 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Moist, L. M. et al. Optimal hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly patient. Semin. Dial. 25, 640–648 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Joly, D. et al. Octogenarians reaching end-stage renal disease: cohort study of decision-making and clinical outcomes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 14, 1012–1021 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keith, D. S., Nichols, G. A., Gullion, C. M., Brown, J. B. & Smith, D. H. Longitudinal follow-up and outcomes among a population with chronic kidney disease in a large managed care organization. Arch. Intern. Med. 164, 659–663 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kooman, J. P., Cornelis, T., van der Sande, F. M. & Leunissen, K. M. Renal replacement therapy in geriatric end-stage renal disease patients: a clinical approach. Blood Purif. 33, 171–176 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murtagh, F. E., Cohen, L. M. & Germain, M. J. The “no dialysis” option. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 18, 443–449 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Knauf, F. & Aronson, P. S. ESRD as a window into America's cost crisis in health care. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 20, 2093–2097 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murtagh, F. E. et al. Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22, 1955–1962 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chandna, S. M. et al. Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 1608–1614 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murtagh, F. E., Addington-Hall, J. M. & Higginson, I. J. End-stage renal disease: a new trajectory of functional decline in the last year of life. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 59, 304–308 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Da Silva-Gane, M. et al. Quality of life and survival in patients with advanced kidney failure managed conservatively or by dialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7, 2002–2009 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kurella Tamura, M. et al. Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1539–1547 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jassal, S. V., Chiu, E. & Hladunewich, M. Loss of independence in patients starting dialysis at 80 years of age or older. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1612–1613 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Burns, A. & Davenport, A. Functional status of elderly adults receiving dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 468 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Noble, H., Meyer, J., Bridges, J., Kelly, D. & Johnson, B. Patient experience of dialysis refusal or withdrawal—a review of the literature. J. Ren. Care 34, 94–100 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Collins, A. J. et al. US Renal Data System 2010 Annual Data Report. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 57 (Suppl. 1), A8 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mehrotra, R., Chiu, Y. W., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Bargman, J. & Vonesh, E. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 171, 110–118 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Weinhandl, E. D. et al. Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 21, 499–506 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Jaar, B. G. et al. Timing, causes, predictors and prognosis of switching from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis: a prospective study. BMC Nephrol. 10, 3 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lim, W. H., Dogra, G. K., McDonald, S. P., Brown, F. G. & Johnson, D. W. Compared with younger peritoneal dialysis patients, elderly patients have similar peritonitis-free survival and lower risk of technique failure, but higher risk of peritonitis-related mortality. Perit. Dial. Int. 31, 663–671 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu, A. W. et al. Changes in quality of life during hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment: generic and disease specific measures. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15, 743–753 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Praga, M. et al. Type of vascular access and survival among very elderly hemodialysis patients. Nephron Clin. Pract. 124, 47–53 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Perl, J. et al. Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 22, 1113–1121 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lok, C. E. et al. Risk equation determining unsuccessful cannulation events and failure to maturation in arteriovenous fistulas (REDUCE FTM I). J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 3204–3212 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Richardson, A. I. 2nd et al. Should fistulas really be first in the elderly patient? J. Vasc. Access 10, 199–202 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bass, E. B. et al. How strong are patients' preferences in choices between dialysis modalities and doses? Am. J. Kidney Dis. 44, 695–705 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harris, S. A., Lamping, D. L., Brown, E. A., Constantinovici, N. & North Thames Dialysis Study (NTDS) Group. Clinical outcomes and quality of life in elderly patients on peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 22, 463–470 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Belasco, A., Barbosa, D., Bettencourt, A. R., Diccini, S. & Sesso, R. Quality of life of family caregivers of elderly patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 48, 955–963 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Foley, R. N. et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risk for cardiovascular disease, renal replacement, and death in the United States Medicare population, 1998 to 1999. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16, 489–495 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. O'Hare, A. M. et al. Age affects outcomes in chronic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 2758–2765 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. O'Hare, A. M. et al. When to refer patients with chronic kidney disease for vascular access surgery: should age be a consideration? Kidney Int. 71, 555–561 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Oliver, M. J. et al. Likelihood of starting dialysis after incident fistula creation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7, 466–471 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Cooper, B. A. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 609–619 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Eriksen, B. O. & Ingebretsen, O. C. The progression of chronic kidney disease: a 10-year population-based study of the effects of gender and age. Kidney Int. 69, 375–382 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Arteriovenous Fistula First. Fistula First Catheter (FF/CL) Data [online], (2013).

  53. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 48 (Suppl. 1), S176–S247 (2006).

  54. Vascular Access Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 48 (Suppl. 1), S248–S273 (2006).

  55. Lee, T., Barker, J. & Allon, M. Comparison of survival of upper arm arteriovenous fistulas and grafts after failed forearm fistula. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 1936–1941 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lok, C. E. et al. Cumulative patency of contemporary fistulas versus grafts (2000–2010). Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 8, 810–818 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Lok, C. E. et al. Arteriovenous fistula outcomes in the era of the elderly dialysis population. Kidney Int. 67, 2462–2469 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. O'Hare, A. M. Vascular access for hemodialysis in older adults: a “patient first” approach. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 24, 1187–1190 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Keuter, X. H. et al. A randomized multicenter study of the outcome of brachial-basilic arteriovenous fistula and prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop as vascular access for hemodialysis. J. Vasc. Surg. 47, 395–401 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Allon, M. Current management of vascular access. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2, 786–800 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lazarides, M. K., Georgiadis, G. S., Antoniou, G. A. & Staramos, D. N. A meta-analysis of dialysis access outcome in elderly patients. J. Vasc. Surg. 45, 420–426 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Weale, A. R. et al. Radiocephalic and brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula outcomes in the elderly. J. Vasc. Surg. 47, 144–150 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jindal, K. et al. Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17 (Suppl. 1), S1–S27 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Vachharajani, T. J. et al. Re-evaluating the Fistula First Initiative in octogenarians on hemodialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 1663–1667 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Glickman, M. H. et al. Multicenter evaluation of a polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access graft as compared with the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access graft in hemodialysis applications. J. Vasc. Surg. 34, 465–472 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Garland, J. S. et al. Prevalence and associations of coronary artery calcification in patients with stages 3 to 5 CKD without cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 52, 849–858 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hassan, N. A., D'Orsi, E. T., D'Orsi, C. J. & O'Neill, W. C. The risk for medial arterial calcification in CKD. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7, 275–279 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Newman, A. B. et al. Coronary artery calcification in older adults to age 99: prevalence and risk factors. Circulation 104, 2679–2684 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Leon, C. & Asif, A. Arteriovenous access and hand pain: the distal hypoperfusion ischemic syndrome. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2, 175–183 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Salman, L., Asif, A. & Beathard, G. A. Retrograde angiography and the risk of arteriovenous fistula perforation. Semin. Dial. 22, 698–701 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zamani, P., Kaufman, J. & Kinlay, S. Ischemic steal syndrome following arm arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Vasc. Med. 14, 371–376 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Davidson, D. et al. Steal syndrome complicating upper extremity hemoaccess procedures: incidence and risk factors. Can. J. Surg. 46, 408–412 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Rooijens, P. P. et al. Autogenous radial-cephalic or prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop AVF in patients with compromised vessels? A randomized, multicenter study of the patency of primary hemodialysis access. J. Vasc. Surg. 42, 481–486 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nephrology, W. G. (Bill) Hefner Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1601 Brenner Avenue, Salisbury, 28144, NC, USA

    Tushar J. Vachharajani

  2. Division of Nephrology, Kidney Clinical Research Unit, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Victoria Hospital, Canada

    Louise M. Moist

  3. Department of Vascular Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, USA

    Marc H. Glickman

  4. Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, USA

    Miguel A. Vazquez

  5. Department of Medicine and Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Center & Monash University, Australia

    Kevan R. Polkinghorne

  6. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Canada

    Charmaine E. Lok

  7. Division of Nephrology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.,

    Timmy C. Lee

Authors
  1. Tushar J. Vachharajani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louise M. Moist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc H. Glickman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miguel A. Vazquez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kevan R. Polkinghorne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Charmaine E. Lok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Timmy C. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T. J. Vachharajani and T. C. Lee researched data for the article, provided a substantial contribution to discussions of the content, wrote the article and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission. L. M. Moist and M. A. Vazquez provided a substantial contribution to discussions of the content and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission. K. R. Polkinghorne reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission. C. E. Lok wrote the article and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission. M. H. Glickman wrote the article and provided a substantial contribution to discussions of the content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tushar J. Vachharajani.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vachharajani, T., Moist, L., Glickman, M. et al. Elderly patients with CKD—dilemmas in dialysis therapy and vascular access. Nat Rev Nephrol 10, 116–122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2013.256

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2013.256

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing