Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Year in Review
  • Published:

Acute kidney injury in 2012

Type of resuscitation fluid—it does matter!

2012 saw the publication of four important trials investigating the choice of fluid therapy in patients suffering from critical illness or undergoing major surgery. These studies pave the way for more evidence-based administration of fluid in such patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Gattas, D. J. et al. Fluid resuscitation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) in acutely ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 114, 159–169 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dellinger, R. P. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med. 34, 17–60 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Finfer, S. et al. Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units. Crit. Care 14, R185 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perner, A. et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 124–134 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Myburgh, J. A. et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1901–1911 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Awad, S., Allison, S. P. & Lobo, D. N. The history of 0.9% saline. Clin. Nutr. 27, 179–188 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadimioglu, N., Saadawy, I., Saglam, T., Ertug, Z. & Dinckan, A. The effect of different crystalloid solutions on acid-base balance and early kidney function after kidney transplantation. Anesth. Analg. 107, 264–269 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Quilley, C. P., Lin, Y. S. & McGiff, J. C. Chloride anion concentration as a determinant of renal vascular responsiveness to vasoconstrictor agents. Br. J. Pharmacol. 108, 106–110 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yunos, N. M. et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA 308, 1566–1572 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw, A. D. et al. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann. Surg. 255, 821–829 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rinaldo Bellomo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, A., Bellomo, R. Type of resuscitation fluid—it does matter!. Nat Rev Nephrol 9, 72–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.283

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2012.283

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing