Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

BACH transcription factors in innate and adaptive immunity

Nature Reviews Immunology volume 17, pages 437–450 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Key Points

  • BTB and CNC homology (BACH) proteins are transcriptional repressors of the basic region leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor family.

  • BACH proteins have widespread roles in immunological processes, including tolerance, memory, immunosuppression and iron homeostasis.

  • BACH proteins stabilize lineage commitment and promote cell-type-specific functions through the repression of alternative lineage programmes.

  • Competitive interactions with transcriptional activators of the bZIP family form a common mechanistic theme underlying the diverse functions of BACH factors.

  • The expression and function of BACH factors are regulated by extrinsic signals to enable fine-tuning of cellular functions.

Abstract

BTB and CNC homology (BACH) proteins are transcriptional repressors of the basic region leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factor family. Recent studies indicate widespread roles of BACH proteins in controlling the development and function of the innate and adaptive immune systems, including the differentiation of effector and memory cells of the B and T cell lineages, CD4+ regulatory T cells and macrophages. Here, we emphasize similarities at a molecular level in the cell-type-specific activities of BACH factors, proposing that competitive interactions of BACH proteins with transcriptional activators of the bZIP family form a common mechanistic theme underlying their diverse actions. The findings contribute to a general understanding of how transcriptional repressors shape lineage commitment and cell-type-specific functions through repression of alternative lineage programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: BACH proteins belong to the bZIP dimeric transcription factor family.
Figure 2: Repressor–activator relationships of BACH family transcription factors.
Figure 3: Functions of BACH factors in myeloid differentiation.
Figure 4: BACH2 restrains immune activation by controlling CD4+ T cell differentiation.
Figure 5: BACH2 restrains terminal effector programmes to promote memory CD8+ T cell differentiation.
Figure 6: BACH2 promotes B cell proliferation and memory cell differentiation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rothenberg, E. V. & Scripture-Adams, D. D. Competition and collaboration: GATA-3, PU.1, and Notch signaling in early T-cell fate determination. Semin. Immunol. 20, 236–246 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang, S., Guo, Y. P., May, G. & Enver, T. Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. Dev. Biol. 305, 695–713 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oyake, T. et al. Bach proteins belong to a novel family of BTB-basic leucine zipper transcription factors that interact with MafK and regulate transcription through the NF-E2 site. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6083–6095 (1996). The discovery and initial characterization of BACH1 and BACH2 as MAF partners.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Reinke, A. W., Baek, J., Ashenberg, O. & Keating, A. E. Networks of bZIP protein–protein interactions diversified over a billion years of evolution. Science 340, 730–734 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner, R. & Tjian, R. Leucine repeats and an adjacent DNA binding domain mediate the formation of functional cFos–cJun heterodimers. Science 243, 1689–1694 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Glover, J. N. & Harrison, S. C. Crystal structure of the heterodimeric bZIP transcription factor c-Fos–c-Jun bound to DNA. Nature 373, 257–261 (1995). The crystal structure of FOS–JUN AP-1 dimers at DNA.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hai, T. & Curran, T. Cross-family dimerization of transcription factors Fos/Jun and ATF/CREB alters DNA binding specificity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3720–3724 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuwahara, M. et al. Bach2–Batf interactions control Th2-type immune response by regulating the IL-4 amplification loop. Nat. Commun. 7, 12596 (2016). The identification of competitive interactions between BACH2–BATF repressor complexes and JUND–BATF–IRF4 activator complexes at a type 2 cytokine locus control region.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Roychoudhuri, R. et al. BACH2 regulates CD8+ T cell differentiation by controlling access of AP-1 factors to enhancers. Nat. Immunol. 17, 851–860 (2016). The discovery of the function of BACH2 in memory CD8+ T cell differentiation and competitive interactions of BACH2 with JUN family AP-1 factors in lymphocytes.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jindrich, K. & Degnan, B. M. The diversification of the basic leucine zipper family in eukaryotes correlates with the evolution of multicellularity. BMC Evol. Biol. 16, 28 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Amoutzias, G. D. et al. One billion years of bZIP transcription factor evolution: conservation and change in dimerization and DNA-binding site specificity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 827–835 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, J. J. et al. Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution. Nat. Genet. 45, 415–421 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrin, B. R. & Cooper, M. D. Alternative adaptive immunity in jawless vertebrates. J. Immunol. 185, 1367–1374 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escriva, H., Manzon, L., Youson, J. & Laudet, V. Analysis of lamprey and hagfish genes reveals a complex history of gene duplications during early vertebrate evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1440–1450 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Itoh-Nakadai, A. et al. The transcription repressors Bach2 and Bach1 promote B cell development by repressing the myeloid program. Nat. Immunol. 15, 1171–1180 (2014). The discovery of the functions of BACH2 and BACH1 in promoting B cell differentiation from common lymphoid progenitors.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaharbakhshi, E. & Jemc, J. C. Broad-complex, tramtrack, and bric-a-brac (BTB) proteins: critical regulators of development. Genesis 54, 505–518 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Igarashi, K. & Watanabe-Matsui, M. Wearing red for signaling: the heme–bach axis in heme metabolism, oxidative stress response and iron immunology. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 232, 229–253 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Igarashi, K. et al. Multivalent DNA binding complex generated by small Maf and Bach1 as a possible biochemical basis for beta-globin locus control region complex. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11783–11790 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshida, C. et al. Long range interaction of cis-DNA elements mediated by architectural transcription factor Bach1. Genes Cells 4, 643–655 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanaka, H. et al. Epigenetic regulation of the Blimp-1 Gene (Prdm1) in B cells involves Bach2 and histone deacetylase 3. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 6316–6330 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoshino, H. et al. Oxidative stress abolishes leptomycin B-sensitive nuclear export of transcription repressor Bach2 that counteracts activation of Maf recognition element. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15370–15376 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hira, S., Tomita, T., Matsui, T., Igarashi, K. & Ikeda-Saito, M. Bach1, a heme-dependent transcription factor, reveals presence of multiple heme binding sites with distinct coordination structure. IUBMB Life 59, 542–551 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe-Matsui, M. et al. Heme regulates B-cell differentiation, antibody class switch, and heme oxygenase-1 expression in B cells as a ligand of Bach2. Blood 117, 5438–5448 (2011). The identification of haem as a regulator of BACH2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe-Matsui, M. et al. Heme binds to an intrinsically disordered region of Bach2 and alters its conformation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 565, 25–31 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tompa, P., Schad, E., Tantos, A. & Kalmar, L. Intrinsically disordered proteins: emerging interaction specialists. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 35, 49–59 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Suenaga, T. et al. Charge-state-distribution analysis of Bach2 intrinsically disordered heme binding region. J. Biochem. 160, 291–298 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Haldar, M. et al. Heme-mediated SPI-C induction promotes monocyte differentiation into iron-recycling macrophages. Cell 156, 1223–1234 (2014). The discovery of the function of BACH1 in regulating bone marrow and red pulp macrophage differentiation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun, J. et al. Hemoprotein Bach1 regulates enhancer availability of heme oxygenase-1 gene. EMBO J. 21, 5216–5224 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Brand, M. et al. Dynamic changes in transcription factor complexes during erythroid differentiation revealed by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 73–80 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogawa, K. et al. Heme mediates derepression of Maf recognition element through direct binding to transcription repressor Bach1. EMBO J. 20, 2835–2843 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Suzuki, H. et al. Heme regulates gene expression by triggering Crm1-dependent nuclear export of Bach1. EMBO J. 23, 2544–2553 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zenke-Kawasaki, Y. et al. Heme induces ubiquitination and degradation of the transcription factor Bach1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 6962–6971 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Alam, J. et al. Heme activates the heme oxygenase-1 gene in renal epithelial cells by stabilizing Nrf2. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 284, F743–F752 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Macian, F., Lopez-Rodriguez, C. & Rao, A. Partners in transcription: NFAT and AP-1. Oncogene 20, 2476–2489 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Murphy, T. L., Tussiwand, R. & Murphy, K. M. Specificity through cooperation: BATF–IRF interactions control immune-regulatory networks. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 499–509 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Muto, A. et al. Activation of Maf/AP-1 repressor Bach2 by oxidative stress promotes apoptosis and its interaction with promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 20724–20733 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, G. R., Fields, P. E., Griffin, T. J. & Flavell, R. A. Regulation of the Th2 cytokine locus by a locus control region. Immunity 19, 145–153 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hama, M. et al. Bach1 regulates osteoclastogenesis in a mouse model via both heme oxygenase 1-dependent and heme oxygenase 1-independent pathways. Arthritis Rheum. 64, 1518–1528 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bhandoola, A. & Sambandam, A. From stem cell to T cell: one route or many? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 117–126 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kondo, M. Lymphoid and myeloid lineage commitment in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. Immunol. Rev. 238, 37–46 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pongubala, J. M. et al. Transcription factor EBF restricts alternative lineage options and promotes B cell fate commitment independently of Pax5. Nat. Immunol. 9, 203–215 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wynn, T. A., Chawla, A. & Pollard, J. W. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature 496, 445–455 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ganz, T. Macrophages and systemic iron homeostasis. J. Innate Immun. 4, 446–453 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun, J. et al. Heme regulates the dynamic exchange of Bach1 and NF-E2-related factors in the Maf transcription factor network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1461–1466 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tan, M. K., Lim, H. J., Bennett, E. J., Shi, Y. & Harper, J. W. Parallel SCF adaptor capture proteomics reveals a role for SCFFBXL17 in NRF2 activation via BACH1 repressor turnover. Mol. Cell 52, 9–24 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Gottwein, E. et al. A viral microRNA functions as an orthologue of cellular miR-155. Nature 450, 1096–1099 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Skalsky, R. L. et al. The viral and cellular microRNA targetome in lymphoblastoid cell lines. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002484 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ota, K., Brydun, A., Itoh-Nakadai, A., Sun, J. & Igarashi, K. Bach1 deficiency and accompanying overexpression of heme oxygenase-1 do not influence aging or tumorigenesis in mice. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 757901 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Yano, Y. et al. Genetic ablation of the transcription repressor Bach1 leads to myocardial protection against ischemia/reperfusion in mice. Genes Cells 11, 791–803 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kanno, H. et al. Genetic ablation of transcription repressor Bach1 reduces neural tissue damage and improves locomotor function after spinal cord injury in mice. J. Neurotrauma 26, 31–39 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yamada, K. et al. Modulation of the secondary injury process after spinal cord injury in Bach1-deficient mice by heme oxygenase-1. J. Neurosurg. Spine 9, 611–620 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Iida, A. et al. Bach1 deficiency ameliorates hepatic injury in a mouse model. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 217, 223–229 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tanimoto, T. et al. Genetic ablation of the Bach1 gene reduces hyperoxic lung injury in mice: role of IL-6. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 46, 1119–1126 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Watari, Y. et al. Ablation of the bach1 gene leads to the suppression of atherosclerosis in bach1 and apolipoprotein E double knockout mice. Hypertens.Res. 31, 783–792 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Harusato, A. et al. BTB and CNC homolog 1 (Bach1) deficiency ameliorates TNBS colitis in mice: role of M2 macrophages and heme oxygenase-1. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 19, 740–753 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Martinez, F. O. & Gordon, S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 6, 13 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. So, A. Y. et al. Regulation of APC development, immune response, and autoimmunity by Bach1/HO-1 pathway in mice. Blood 120, 2428–2437 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Naito, Y., Takagi, T. & Higashimura, Y. Heme oxygenase-1 and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 564, 83–88 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kanzaki, H. et al. RANKL induces Bach1 nuclear import and attenuates Nrf2-mediated antioxidant enzymes, thereby augmenting intracellular reactive oxygen species signaling and osteoclastogenesis in mice. FASEB J. 31, 781–792 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Roychoudhuri, R. et al. BACH2 represses effector programs to stabilize T(reg)-mediated immune homeostasis. Nature 498, 506–510 (2013). The discovery of the role of BACH2 in immunological tolerance and in the regulation of CD4+ T reg cell and effector T cell differentiation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kim, E. H. et al. Bach2 regulates homeostasis of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and protects against fatal lung disease in mice. J. Immunol. 192, 985–995 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nakamura, A. et al. Transcription repressor Bach2 is required for pulmonary surfactant homeostasis and alveolar macrophage function. J. Exp. Med. 210, 2191–2204 (2013). The identification and characterization of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in Bach2 -deficient mice.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Hori, S., Nomura, T. & Sakaguchi, S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299, 1057–1061 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Khattri, R., Cox, T., Yasayko, S. A. & Ramsdell, F. An essential role for Scurfin in CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4, 337–342 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fontenot, J. D., Gavin, M. A. & Rudensky, A. Y. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 4, 330–336 (2003). References 63–65 describe how the transcription factor FOXP3 fulfils a crucial function in immunological tolerance by promoting the differentiation of CD4+ T reg cells.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ohkura, N., Kitagawa, Y. & Sakaguchi, S. Development and maintenance of regulatory T cells. Immunity 38, 414–4232 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tang, Q. & Bluestone, J. A. The Foxp3+ regulatory T cell: a jack of all trades, master of regulation. Nat. Immunol. 9, 239–244 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Josefowicz, S. Z., Lu, L. F. & Rudensky, A. Y. Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 531–564 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Quezada, S. A., Peggs, K. S., Simpson, T. R. & Allison, J. P. Shifting the equilibrium in cancer immunoediting: from tumor tolerance to eradication. Immunol. Rev. 241, 104–118 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Roychoudhuri, R., Eil, R. L. & Restifo, N. P. The interplay of effector and regulatory T cells in cancer. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 33, 101–111 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Roychoudhuri, R. et al. The transcription factor BACH2 promotes tumor immunosuppression. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 599–604 (2016). The discovery of the function of BACH2 in promoting tumour immunosuppression.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. van der Weyden, L. et al. Genome-wide in vivo screen identifies novel host regulators of metastatic colonization. Nature 541, 233–236 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Ascierto, M. L. et al. The intratumoral balance between metabolic and immunologic gene expression is associated with anti-PD-1 response in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Res. 4, 726–733 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Tsukumo, S. et al. Bach2 maintains T cells in a naive state by suppressing effector memory-related genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10735–10740 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Kuwahara, M. et al. The Menin–Bach2 axis is critical for regulating CD4 T-cell senescence and cytokine homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 5, 3555 (2014). The discovery of the function of BACH2 in suppressing cellular senescence in CD4+ T cells.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Restifo, N. P. & Gattinoni, L. Lineage relationship of effector and memory T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 25, 556–563 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kaech, S. M. & Cui, W. Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 749–761 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Belz, G. T. & Kallies, A. Effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation: toward a molecular understanding of fate determination. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 22, 279–285 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Hedrick, S. M., Hess Michelini, R., Doedens, A. L., Goldrath, A. W. & Stone, E. L. FOXO transcription factors throughout T cell biology. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 649–661 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Chang, J. T., Wherry, E. J. & Goldrath, A. W. Molecularregulation of effector and memory T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 15, 1104–1115 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Teixeiro, E. et al. Different T cell receptor signals determine CD8+ memory versus effector development. Science 323, 502–505 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Wirth, T. C. et al. Repetitive antigen stimulation induces stepwise transcriptome diversification but preserves a core signature of memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Immunity 33, 128–140 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Roychoudhuri, R. et al. Transcriptional profiles reveal a stepwise developmental program of memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Vaccine 33, 914–923 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hu, G. & Chen, J. A genome-wide regulatory network identifies key transcription factors for memory CD8+ T-cell development. Nat. Commun. 4, 2830 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Kaech, S. M. et al. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4, 1191–1198 (2003). The identification of memory precursor effector cells as progenitors of CD8+ T cell memory.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Cui, W. & Kaech, S. M. Generation of effector CD8+ T cells and their conversion to memory T cells. Immunol. Rev. 236, 151–166 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Opferman, J. T. et al. Development and maintenance of B and T lymphocytes requires antiapoptotic MCL-1. Nature 426, 671–676 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Ikeda, T., Shibata, J., Yoshimura, K., Koito, A. & Matsushita, S. Recurrent HIV-1 integration at the BACH2 locus in resting CD4+ T cell populations during effective highly active antiretroviral therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 195, 716–725 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Maldarelli, F. et al. HIV latency. Specific HIV integration sites are linked to clonal expansion and persistence of infected cells. Science 345, 179–183 (2014). References 88 and 89 describe recurrent HIV-1 proviral integration in the BACH2 locus of CD4+ T cells that are persistently infected after initiation of ART.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Wagner, T. A. et al. HIV latency. Proliferation of cells with HIV integrated into cancer genes contributes to persistent infection. Science 345, 570–573 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Kurosaki, T., Kometani, K. & Ise, W. Memory B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 149–159 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Muto, A. et al. The transcriptional programme of antibody class switching involves the repressor Bach2. Nature 429, 566–571 (2004). The discovery of the requirement for BACH2 in CSR and SHM of immunoglobulin genes.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Shinnakasu, R. et al. Regulated selection of germinal-center cells into the memory B cell compartment. Nat. Immunol. 17, 861–869 (2016). This paper identifies that BACH2 expression levels have an instructive role in the differentiation of memory B cells in the germinal centre.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Ochiai, K. et al. Plasmacytic transcription factor Blimp-1 is repressed by Bach2 in B cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 38226–38234 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Muto, A. et al. Bach2 represses plasma cell gene regulatory network in B cells to promote antibody class switch. EMBO J. 29, 4048–4061 (2010). A demonstration of the requirement of BACH2-mediated Prdm1 repression in CSR of immunoglobulin genes.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Kometani, K. et al. Repression of the transcription factor Bach2 contributes to predisposition of IgG1 memory B cells toward plasma cell differentiation. Immunity 39, 136–147 (2013). A demonstration that expression levels of BACH2 are a crucial determinant of the functional activity of memory B cells.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Ochiai, K., Muto, A., Tanaka, H., Takahashi, S. & Igarashi, K. Regulation of the plasma cell transcription factor Blimp-1 gene by Bach2 and Bcl6. Int. Immunol. 20, 453–460 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Huang, C., Geng, H., Boss, I., Wang, L. & Melnick, A. Cooperative transcriptional repression by BCL6 and BACH2 in germinal center B-cell differentiation. Blood 123, 1012–1020 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Smith, K. G., Light, A., Nossal, G. J. & Tarlinton, D. M. The extent of affinity maturation differs between the memory and antibody-forming cell compartments in the primary immune response. EMBO J. 16, 2996–3006 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Zotos, D. et al. IL-21 regulates germinal center B cell differentiation and proliferation through a B cell-intrinsic mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 207, 365–378 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Linterman, M. A. et al. IL-21 acts directly on B cells to regulate Bcl-6 expression and germinal center responses. J. Exp. Med. 207, 353–363 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Ochiai, K. et al. Transcriptional regulation of germinal center B and plasma cell fates by dynamical control of IRF4. Immunity 38, 918–929 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Heise, N. et al. Germinal center B cell maintenance and differentiation are controlled by distinct NF-kappaB transcription factor subunits. J. Exp. Med. 211, 2103–2118 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Willinger, T., Freeman, T., Hasegawa, H., McMichael, A. J. & Callan, M. F. Molecular signatures distinguish human central memory from effector memory CD8 T cell subsets. J. Immunol. 175, 5895–5903 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Vahedi, G. et al. Super-enhancers delineate disease-associated regulatory nodes in T cells. Nature 520, 558–562 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Jang, K. J. et al. Mitochondrial function provides instructive signals for activation-induced B-cell fates. Nat. Commun. 6, 6750 (2015). A demonstration of the regulation of plasma cell differentiation by haem metabolism.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Ando, R. et al. The transcription factor Bach2 is phosphorylated at multiple sites in murine B cells but a single site prevents its nuclear localization. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 1826–1840 (2016). The identification of BACH2 phosphorylation sites in B cells using mass spectrometry.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Yoshida, C. et al. Bcr–Abl signaling through the PI-3/S6 kinase pathway inhibits nuclear translocation of the transcription factor Bach2, which represses the antiapoptotic factor heme oxygenase-1. Blood 109, 1211–1219 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Heng, T. S., Painter, M. W. & Immunological Genome Project Consortium. The Immunological Genome Project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat. Immunol. 9, 1091–1094 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Itoh-Nakadai, A. et al. Bach2-Cebp gene regulatory network for the commitment of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. Cell Rep. 18, 2401–2414 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Zhang, D. X. & Glass, C. K. Towards an understanding of cell-specific functions of signal-dependent transcription factors. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 51, T37–T50 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature 476, 214–219 (2011).

  113. Cooper, J. D. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association study data identifies additional type 1 diabetes risk loci. Nat. Genet. 40, 1399–1401 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Dubois, P. C. et al. Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nat. Genet. 42, 295–302 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Ferreira, M. A. et al. Identification of IL6R and chromosome 11q13.5 as risk loci for asthma. Lancet 378, 1006–1014 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Franke, A. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of confirmed Crohn's disease susceptibility loci. Nat. Genet. 42, 1118–1125 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Jin, Y. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 13 new susceptibility loci for generalized vitiligo. Nat. Genet. 44, 676–680 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Reich, D. E. et al. Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Nature 411, 199–204 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Christodoulou, K. et al. Next generation exome sequencing of paediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients identifies rare and novel variants in candidate genes. Gut 62, 977–984 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Medici, M. et al. Identification of novel genetic Loci associated with thyroid peroxidase antibodies and clinical thyroid disease. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004123 (2014). References 112–120 identify polymorphic genetic variations in the BACH2 locus that are associated with immune-mediated diseases.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Swaminathan, S. et al. BACH2 mediates negative selection and p53-dependent tumor suppression at the pre-B cell receptor checkpoint. Nat. Med. 19, 1014–1022 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Casolari, D. A. et al. Transcriptional suppression of BACH2 by the Bcr-Abl oncoprotein is mediated by PAX5. Leukemia 27, 409–415 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Scholtysik, R. et al. Characterization of genomic imbalances in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by detailed SNP-chip analysis. Int. J. Cancer 136, 1033–1042 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Ichikawa, S. et al. Association between BACH2 expression and clinical prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 105, 437–444 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Sakane-Ishikawa, E. et al. Prognostic significance of BACH2 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study of the Osaka Lymphoma Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 8012–8017 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Vassiliou, G. S. et al. Mutant nucleophosmin and cooperating pathways drive leukemia initiation and progression in mice. Nat. Genet. 43, 470–475 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.R is supported by the Wellcome Trust−Royal Society (grant 105663/Z/14/Z), the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant BB/N007794/1) and Cancer Research UK (grant C52623/A22597). K.I. is supported by grants-in-aid (16K15227, 15H02506, 23116003) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and AMED-CREST and P-CREATE from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. T.K. is supported by grants-in-aid (A212290070, A262213060) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and CREST (J098501018) from Japan Science Technology. The authors thank N. P. Restifo, L. Gattinoni, M. Stammers, A. Muto, K. Ochiai, A. Itoh-Nakadai, M. Watanabe-Matsui, D. Clever, R. Eil, F. M. Grant, R. Nasrallah, F. Sadiyah, T. M. Lozano, K. Okkenhaug, M. Turner and G. W. Butcher for ideas and discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Center for Regulatory Epigenome and Diseases, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan

    Kazuhiko Igarashi

  2. Laboratory for Lymphocyte Differentiation, WPI Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, 565-0871, Japan

    Tomohiro Kurosaki

  3. Laboratory for Lymphocyte Differentiation, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (IMS), Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan

    Tomohiro Kurosaki

  4. Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signalling and Development, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK

    Rahul Roychoudhuri

Authors
  1. Kazuhiko Igarashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomohiro Kurosaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rahul Roychoudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Roychoudhuri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Glossary

TPA response elements

(TREs). DNA sequences (with similarity to 5′-TGA(G/C)TCA-3′) that promote gene expression induced by the phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol- 13-acetate (TPA) and that are the canonical recognition sequence of the activator protein 1 (AP-1) transcription factor complexes formed by dimers of JUN and FOS.

cAMP response elements

(CREs). DNA sequences (with similarity to 5′-TGACGTCA-3′) that promote gene expression induced by the cyclic AMP (cAMP) pathway and that are the canonical recognition sequence of CRE-binding protein (CREB) complexes.

Enhancers

Regulatory elements that function together with promoters to control gene expression. Enhancers can lie within intronic and intergenic regions and form looping interactions to bring enhancer-bound transcription factor complexes into contact with general transcription factors assembled at promoters. Distinct repertoires of enhancers function in different cell types, allowing for cell-type-specific regulation of gene expression.

Genetic polymorphisms

Genetic variations occurring in a specific population at such a frequency that the rarest of them cannot be maintained by recurrent mutation or immigration alone: therefore, they most frequently occur through inheritance.

Thymus-derived Treg cells

(tTreg cells). Most of these cells develop at the CD4+ single-positive stage of thymic T cell maturation as a result of the intermediate affinity of their T cell receptors for self-antigens. These cells contribute to peripheral tolerance against self-antigens.

Peripherally derived Treg cells

(pTreg cells). These cells develop from mature CD4+FOXP3− T cells in peripheral tissues. pTreg cells are frequently induced at mucosal sites, such as the lungs and gut, where they contribute to tolerance against innocuous foreign antigens.

Progressive differentiation model

Proposes that naive T cells differentiate into a heterogeneous pool of memory precursor and effector T cells early during infection. Effector cells are short-lived and die following the withdrawal of antigen. Memory precursor cells survive after contraction of the effector population and give rise to memory cells. The alternative linear differentiation model proposes that naive CD8+ T cells differentiate uniformly into effector cells early during immune responses, and a subset of these differentiate into memory cells on the withdrawal of antigen.

Cellular senescence

A form of irreversible growth arrest that limits the replicative lifespan of cells. Replicative senescence is induced by telomere shortening that occurs as a result of DNA replication during mitosis. Premature cellular senescence occurs in the absence of telomere shortening and results in growth arrest and apoptosis through the action of gene products of the INK4/ARF locus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Igarashi, K., Kurosaki, T. & Roychoudhuri, R. BACH transcription factors in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 17, 437–450 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.26

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.26

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing