Main

In the course of evolution, most organisms have developed mechanisms to utilize oxygen for various biological processes, such as the synthesis of biomolecules, energy production and phagocytosis. Cellular usage of oxygen leads to the constant generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are mainly generated by the mitochondria. In addition, ROS are generated in peroxisomes, the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane. Within eukaryotic organisms, superoxide, peroxide and hydroxyl radicals represent the main types of ROS that have high reactivity and low stability and that actively drive many cellular reactions. The biological effects of ROS greatly depend on the amounts of ROS present, which supports the idea that cellular ROS generation has characteristics of hormesis1. Indeed, at low concentrations, ROS participate in physiological processes, such as cell renewal, cellular metabolism, proliferation and differentiation1,2,3,4. However, high ROS production during an oxidative burst is crucial for host defence to ensure microbial killing5 and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)6. These cellular responses and the modulation of immune responses by ROS have been recently reviewed1,3,4,7. However, both exogenous triggers, such as ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, chemical toxins and hyperthermia, and endogenous conditions, including senescence, metabolic changes and inflammation, can impair the balance between the generation and the elimination of intracellular ROS, which can lead to ROS accumulation and oxidative stress. The harmful effects that are caused by oxidative stress are typically limited by antioxidant responses, which include the induction of enzymes and proteins that eliminate ROS. However, if unresolved, oxidative stress generates cellular and extracellular damage by irreversibly modifying DNA, RNA, proteins and lipids, which ultimately leads to molecular modifications that disrupt normal functions and often results in cell0 death. Oxidative modifications of biomolecules also lead to the generation of secondary free radicals, which further propagate oxidative damage1,3,4,7.

Lipids, particularly phospholipids, are prime targets for oxidation owing to their abundance as important building blocks of cells, extracellular vesicles and lipoproteins. The oxidation of lipids not only alters their biological function but also results in the generation of various degradation products through a process that is known as lipid peroxidation8 (Box 1). The newly generated products propagate the effect of oxidative stress by directly modulating cellular functions and responses such as metabolism and inflammation9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Furthermore, as the degradation products of oxidized lipids are often highly reactive, they modify self-molecules and thereby generate structural neo-epitopes that are recognized by receptors of the immune system. These neo-epitopes have been termed oxidation-specific epitopes (OSEs) and represent a common set of epitopes present on various oxidatively modified self-proteins and lipids14,19. OSEs, including oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) and malondialdehyde (MDA)-modified amino groups, have been documented on the surface of apoptotic cells, microvesicles and damaged structures such as oxidized low-density lipoproteins (OxLDLs)14,17,20. They are sensed by humoral and cellular components of the innate immune system, which mediate their removal and prevent inflammatory effects. However, if not efficiently cleared, they can also act as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and can trigger sterile inflammation21,22 (Box 2).

In this Review, we discuss the role of OSEs in health and disease, and the innate immune responses that specifically target OSEs as markers of oxidative stress.

The generation of OSEs

Oxidized lipids, and their degradation products, can interfere with the normal function of proteins and lipids. However, a unique aspect of some of these lipid derivatives is their ability to modify proteins and lipids and to form OSEs, which are then recognized by the immune system in a hapten-specific manner; for example, the same OSE can be present on different proteins and can be recognized by a common set of innate immune receptors. Several mechanisms can lead to the oxidation of lipids, particularly of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)8,23,24, and important insights into the generation of OSEs have been obtained from studies on the biological activities of OxLDL that are central to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis25,26. Lipid peroxidation involves both enzymatic mechanisms, including lipoxygenases, cyclooxygenases and cytochrome p450, and non-enzymatic mechanisms, which are mediated by free radicals and which require catalysis by transition metals or hemin23,26,27,28 (Box 1). Moreover, there is now ample evidence that during apoptosis membrane lipids undergo oxidation, which results in the generation of OSEs. The exact mechanisms that lead to the oxidation of cellular membrane lipids are still being elucidated17,29.

PUFA-containing phospholipids, such as the major membrane phospholipid phosphatidylcholine, are particularly prone to oxidative damage, and their peroxidation results in the generation of a complex mixture of OxPLs and terminal degradation products8,23,24 (Box 1). These, in turn, form adducts with, for example, the amino group of lysine residues or aminophospholipids to generate OSEs. In particular, the oxidation of the PUFA chain at the sn-2 position of phosphatidylcholine results in its fragmentation and the generation of reactive PUFA breakdown products such as MDA and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), which can modify self-molecules and form OSEs (Fig. 1). OSEs can also be generated by the modification of proteins with truncated phospholipids, such as oxidized phosphatidylcholine, oxidized cardiolipin (OxCL), oxidized phosphatidylserine (OxPS) and oxidized phosphatidylethanolamine (OxPE)8,30,31,32. Furthermore, 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP) represents an adduct between (E)-4-hydroxy-7-oxohept-5-enoic acid — an oxidative fragment of docosahexaenoic acid — and the amino groups of lysines or aminophospholipids24,33,34. Notably, some of these breakdown products, such as MDA and 4-HNE, have been studied as prototypical markers of oxidative stress and can be measured by the frequently used 2-thiobarbituric acid reaction (TBAR) method8. As a vast diversity of OxPLs can be generated, many more OSEs derived from these may exist23,28. Moreover, the oxidation of other lipids, such as cholesterol and cholesteryl esters, can lead to structural changes and altered biological activities, but their ability to be recognized by innate immune receptors is still being characterized10,25,35. It will be important to elucidate the exact structures of the relevant OSEs to better understand their recognition by the immune system. Owing to their biological activities, these products of lipid peroxidation have been implicated in a wide variety of physiological and pathological processes, and immune responses that target these products can modulate many of these effects14,30,36.

Figure 1: The generation of OSEs.
figure 1

Tissue damage, cellular stress and cell death result in increased oxidative stress, which promotes lipid peroxidation. Lipid peroxidation can occur through non-enzymatic mechanisms, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), and through enzymatic mechanisms, including myeloperoxidases, 12/15-lipoxygenases, cyclooxygenases and cytochrome P450. The oxidation of sn-2 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) of membrane phospholipids leads to fragmentation and the generation of highly reactive breakdown products, such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE)8,30,31,32. In addition, different types of oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) can be generated from different phospholipid backbones, including oxidized phosphatidylcholine, oxidized phosphatidylethanolamine (OxPE), oxidized phosphatidylserine (OxPS) and oxidized cardiolipin (OxCL). The newly generated breakdown products and the oxidized and truncated residual core OxPLs can in turn react with free amino groups of protein side chains or lipids that are localized in their vicinity, forming stable covalent adducts and creating oxidation-specific epitopes (OSEs). Because phosphocholine (PC) as an OSE is only presented as an epitope in the context of OxPL, these epitopes are termed PC-OxPLs for clarity. The PC moiety can also be a component of the capsular polysaccharide of bacteria, where it is not part of a phospholipid and is constitutively presented as an epitope. In addition, an adduct between an oxidative fragment of docosahexaenoic acid, (E)-4-hydroxy-7-oxohept-5-enoic acid and lysines of proteins (or aminophospholipids) can lead to the formation of 2-(ω-carboxyethyl) pyrrole (CEP). OSE-modified proteins or lipids are sensed by innate immune responses and represent a unique class of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs).

PowerPoint slide

Immune recognition of OSEs

OSEs have important roles in physiological processes, as they mark oxidatively modified endogenous molecules, such as proteins and/or lipoproteins and apoptotic cells, as being damaged by increased oxidative stress. This facilitates their removal by the housekeeping functions of the immune system to maintain homeostasis. In pathological situations — in which oxidative events are greatly increased and the homeostatic functions of innate immunity are overwhelmed and/or impaired — the accumulation of OSEs leads to sterile inflammation, which is a mechanism that should ultimately restore normal tissue integrity22 (Box 2). If this fails as a result of persistent tissue damage and/or impaired resolution, the accumulation of OSEs can trigger chronic inflammation. Therefore, OSEs have important roles in both the regulation of tissue homeostasis and inflammatory responses (Fig. 2). The detailed characterization of OSEs and the immune responses against these OSEs have shown that they are recognized by both cellular and soluble pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including natural IgM antibodies14,31 (Table 1).

Figure 2: Role of innate immune responses targeting OSEs.
figure 2

Oxidized low-density lipoproteins (OxLDL), apoptotic cells, microvesicles and cellular debris display various types of oxidation-specific epitopes (OSEs)17,20,67,81,88. Components of cellular and humoral immune responses sense OSEs and mediate sterile inflammation or clearance and neutralization depending on the availability and context. Macrophages sense OSEs through various pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that are expressed on their surface. Scavenger receptor CD36 preferentially binds and mediates the uptake of the phosphocholine (PC) of OxPL (PC-OxPL), oxidized phosphatidylserine (OxPS) and 2-(ω-carboxyethyl)pyrrole (CEP). Scavenger receptor SRB1 recognizes PC-OxPL; SRA1 andlectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1 (LOX1) bind malondialdehyde (MDA); and LOX1 recognizes 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE)14,37. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) mediate pro-inflammatory signals. PC-OxPL transmit inflammatory signals through a heterotrimer of TLR4–TLR6–CD36, as well as through TLR2, and CEP signals through TLR2 in cooperation with CD36 (Refs 33,46). Humoral immune responses to OSEs include natural IgM antibodies, C-reactive protein (CRP), members of complement and other soluble PRRs that are involved in the clearance of apoptotic cells. Soluble PRRs inhibit the recognition of OSEs by cellular PRRs and mediate uptake via alternative pathways. Natural IgM bound to PC-OxPL, MDA and 4-HNE epitopes are taken up by macrophages by C1q–calreticulin–CD91-dependent or mannose-binding lectin (MBL)- and MBL receptor-dependent mechanisms. CRP bound to PC-OxPL is taken up by C1q–calreticulin–CD91-dependent mechanisms103,151. Alternative recognition of C1q is mediated by CD93 (not shown). Complement factor H (CFH) bound to MDA provides cofactor activity for the cleavage of C3b into iC3b opsonins67 that mediate anti-inflammatory clearance via complement receptor 3 (CR3). Milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) bound to OxPS or OxPE mediate clearance via αvβ3 integrins72,73.

PowerPoint slide

Table 1 Cellular and humoral immune responses targeting OSEs

OSE sensing by cellular PRRs. OSEs are recognized by a wide variety of cell surface receptors (Table 1), most of which are expressed by macrophages. Macrophages mediate the uptake and phagocytosis of oxidatively altered molecules and cells, and macrophages also sense the accumulation of OSEs in the local microenvironment, which triggers signalling pathways that induce the secretion of inflammatory chemokines and cytokines14,17,31.

Scavenger receptors represent the prototypical class of innate receptors for OSEs37. They are multi-ligand receptors that bind both modified self-structures and non-self molecules. Different types of scavenger receptors have been identified, including CD36, SRA1, SRA2, SRB1, CD68 and lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1 (LOX1; also known as OLR1)37. Among these, SRA1, SRA2 and CD36 are considered to be responsible for most of the OxLDL uptake by macrophages in in vitro assays, because macrophages that are deficient in CD36, SRA1 and SRA2 show 75–90% decreased binding and degradation of OxLDL38. Detailed structural studies have shown that OxPL is a high-affinity ligand that mediates OxLDL binding to CD36 (Ref. 39), and, specifically, that this is mediated by the phosphocholine (PC) headgroup of OxPL (PC-OxPL) but the PC of unoxidized phospholipids does not serve as a ligand40. Binding can also be mediated by the truncated sn-2 acyl chain of OxPLs41,42, which indicates that other classes of oxidized phospholipids such as OxPS can bind to CD36 (Refs 43,44). Similarly, PC-OxPL also mediates the uptake of OxLDL by SRB1 on macrophages45. Examples of other OSEs that are recognized by scavenger receptors include CEP-modified proteins, which are recognized by CD36 (Ref. 46) and MDA-modified proteins, which are taken up by SRA1 and SRA247,48. A recent study showed that the endothelial scavenger receptor LOX1 mediates MDA-induced nitric oxide (NO) production49 and this receptor also binds 4-HNE50.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) also recognize and respond to OSEs. Macrophages stimulated with oxidized 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (OxPAPC) secrete interleukin-6 (IL-6), whereas IL-6 production is absent in macrophages that lack TLR4 or TIR-domain-containing adaptor protein inducing interferon-β (TRIF; also known as TICAM1)51. Sensing of PC-OxPL seems to be important for the TLR4-mediated effects, as the PC-specific IgM T15/E06 inhibited IL-6 secretion induced by OxPAPC but did not inhibit IL-6 secretion induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)51. OxPLs have also been reported to stimulate macrophages via a TLR2 pathway52. Moreover, chemokine secretion by macrophages stimulated with OxLDL has been shown to require the cooperation of CD36 with a TLR4–TLR6 heterodimer53. Conversely, OxPLs induce apoptosis in macrophages via TLR2–TLR6 in cooperation with a CD36 ligand54. As most of these studies have used mixtures of different OxPL products, individual OxPL moieties might use TLR receptors in varying combinations to generate different signalling pathways. The common role of TLRs as sensors of OSEs is further supported by the findings that CEP adducts are bound by TLR2, but not by TLR4, on both endothelial cells33 and macrophages46. Furthermore, CEP selectively augments TLR2–TLR1 signalling in macrophages55 and has been shown to activate platelets via TLR2–TLR1 (Ref. 56). TLRs have not yet been directly implicated in chemokine secretion that is induced by MDA or 4-HNE, but this process is probably also mediated by the cooperation of scavenger receptors with other signalling PRRs57. Oxidized cholesteryl esters (OxCEs) trigger pro-inflammatory macrophage responses via TLR4 and these involve non-classical signalling via spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK)35,58. Thus, some OSEs represent endogenous TLR ligands that have the capacity to trigger inflammatory responses. Notably, in endotoxin-induced inflammation, soluble OxPLs impair complex formation of TLR4 with CD14, MD2 and LPS-binding protein and thereby dampen LPS-induced responses23,59. Recently, epoxycyclopentenones that are present in OxPAPC were identified as active components responsible for the inhibitory effects of OxPAPC on the activation of specific TLRs by synthetic ligands60. An interesting property of the inflammatory responses to OxPL is the tight cooperation with scavenger receptors, such as CD36, which mediate recognition of OxPLs and probably also facilitate sensing and signalling by TLRs. Although OxLDL uptake via CD36 seems to be necessary for some macrophage signalling pathways, it is unknown to what extent scavenger receptor-mediated uptake of other OSEs is required for their cellular responses.

OSE sensing by soluble PRRs. Soluble PRRs include secreted versions of cellular PRR, pentraxins and proteins of the complement system61. Whereas some of these proteins interact with cellular PRRs to mediate the signals of bound ligands, others participate in the housekeeping functions of the host. Soluble PRRs distinguish between healthy and damaged tissues by sensing metabolic byproducts and OSEs presented on dying cells (Table 1).

C-reactive protein (CRP) was originally identified as the C-reactive component of plasma that could bind the PC present on the capsular polysaccharide of Streptococcus pneumoniae62,63,64. However, this PC moiety is not part of a phospholipid and CRP was later found to also bind PC-OxPL found on OxLDL and on apoptotic cell membranes65. This molecular mimicry between microbial PC and PC-OxPL enables CRP to respond to a common OSE present during both microbial infections and oxidative stress. By analogy, Porphyromonas gingivalis and group A Streptococcus have been suggested to carry MDA-like epitopes, but their ability to be recognized by MDA-specific PRRs has not been tested in detail66.

The identification of complement-regulatory protein complement factor H (CFH) as a receptor for MDA-epitopes has shed important light on its function in disease67. CFH consists of 20 short consensus repeats (SCRs)68 and two of its domains — SCR7 and SCR19-20 — mediate the binding of CFH to MDA67. Importantly, these binding sites are hotspots for disease-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)69; for example, SNP rs1061170 results in a Y>H exchange of amino acid 402 in SCR7 and reduces the ability of plasma CFH to bind MDA by more than 65% for homozygous carriers compared with controls67. In addition, the use of recombinant variants of the SCR19-20 domain demonstrated that other SNPs in SCR19-20 could alter binding to MDA70. Thus, genetic variants of both MDA-binding sites of CFH may determine the ability of CFH to bind MDA. Considering the conserved structure of the regulators of complement activation, MDA-epitopes could also serve as binding sites for other members of this family68. Interestingly, the C3 cleavage product C3a, which acts as a pro-inflammatory anaphylatoxin, was also shown to bind MDA-epitopes71.

Other soluble PRRs may recognize oxidized rather than native lipid structures on cellular surfaces, but the exact nature of these interactions is less well understood. For example, milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) has recently been shown to specifically recognize OxPS72 and OxPE73. Moreover, another phosphatidylserine-binding protein, annexin A5, has been suggested to bind to OxCL and to neutralize its biological effects74.

Therefore, OSEs represent targets for several soluble PRRs of the innate immune system. As different OSEs are often present on the same surfaces, different soluble PRRs binding to them may synergize and cooperate in their effector functions. For example, apoptotic cells and microvesicles carry both MDA and PC-OxPL epitopes20,75, each of which recruits different soluble PRRs to the same surface.

OSEs are major targets of natural IgM antibodies. OSEs have been identified as prominent antigens of natural IgM antibodies (Table 1). IgM antibodies in human umbilical cord blood, which represent naive natural antibodies of fetal origin, have specificity for OSEs75. In fact, titres of IgM with specificity for OxLDL and MDA-LDL were higher in cord blood samples compared with matched maternal blood samples. The specific binding properties of natural IgM antibodies have been investigated by characterizing IgM antibodies derived both from in vitro stimulated B-1 cells and from the plasma of mice lacking recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) that were selectively reconstituted with B-1 cells75. These studies revealed that several OSEs, including PC-OxPL, MDA and 4-HNE adducts are bound by up to 30% of all natural IgM found in the plasma of both wild-type and gnotobiotic mice, and by a similar percentage of IgM-secreting cells from the spleens of wild-type mice75. Furthermore, several monoclonal natural IgM antibodies with specificity for different OSEs have been characterized. For example, the well-studied PC-binding T15/E06 IgM — which contains a variable region that is composed of a canonical rearrangement of germline genes in both the VL and VH chains — was originally cloned from the spleens of atherosclerosis-prone apolipoprotein E (Apoe−/−) mice as an antibody with specificity for OxLDL, which was later found to be specific for PC-OxPL76,77,78. The same antibody idiotype, as an IgA, was originally described due to its ability to bind PC present in the capsular polysaccharide of S. pneumoniae76,79,80. In addition, several other IgMs that bind different OSEs have been identified, such as the OxCL-specific LR01 and a number of others with specificity for MDA-type adducts, including E014, NA17 and LR04. Similar to T15/E06, all of the OSE-specific natural IgM antibodies that have been described exhibit germline or near-germline usage in their complementary-determining region 3 (CDR3), identifying them as natural IgM75,78,81,82. Thus, natural IgM antibodies prominently participate in the response to OSEs.

Role of OSEs in the maintenance of homeostasis

Physiological carriers of OSEs. Tissue homeostasis depends on the efficient removal of dying cells, which is achieved by molecular tags that mark cellular debris at different stages of cellular death. The quiescent removal of apoptotic cells is mainly mediated by phagocytes that sense several 'find-me' and 'eat-me' signals on apoptotic cells83,84,85. However, in situations of increased cell death and/or inefficient clearance, apoptotic cells can release DAMPs that trigger sterile inflammation22 and render these cells immunogenic17. OSEs on late-stage apoptotic cells have been identified as important ligands for the clearance of apoptotic cells under these conditions17,18,75,81,86,87. In fact, apoptotic mammalian cells of every cellular origin tested display OSEs on their surface independently of the apoptosis trigger, and these OSEs are identical to the ones on OxLDL18 (Fig. 2). Notably, only a small proportion of early apoptotic cells display OSEs, which is in contrast to late apoptotic cells as >50% of this cell population carries OSEs18,81. A subset of apoptotic cells is bound by natural IgM antibodies with specificity for PC-OxPL and different types of MDA epitopes, and some are bound by monoclonal antibodies with specificity for OxCL17,18,75,81,82. Furthermore, mass spectrometry has demonstrated that lipid extracts of thymocytes, in which apoptosis was induced by several triggers, were enriched in different OxPLs17. Similarly, microvesicles generated from monocytes that were loaded with unesterified cholesterol, as well as t-BuOOH-oxidized microvesicles that were derived from endothelial cells, carried both MDA and PC-OxPL epitopes in their membranes88,89.

More recently, we also identified a subset of circulating microvesicles as carriers of various OSEs20. Microvesicles have been implicated in several diseases owing to their pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant activities90. Interestingly, MDA adducts consisting of simple MDA-lysine adducts, as well as more complex adducts made up of a lysine residue and two or more MDA moieties, were the most prominent OSE found on 50% of circulating microvesicles, whereas PC-OxPLs were found on fewer microvesicles but were found to a greater extent on the surface of the same microvesicles. The presence of OSEs was generally independent of cellular origin, supporting their universal presence20. Moreover, a portion of the microvesicles also carried IgM bound on their surface, which was primarily directed against MDA, consistent with their prominent presence. Interestingly, a subset of circulating microvesicles also carry CRP on their surface, which is consistent with the presence of PC-OxPL91.

Thus, different mechanisms of cell death and generation of microvesicles result in the surface presentation of various types of OSEs. An interesting area for future investigations includes understanding whether the presence of OSEs is associated with other types of cell death such as pyroptosis, necroptosis and ferroptosis85,92.

Physiological role of OSEs. In situations that are associated with increased oxidative stress, which favour OSE generation, a large amount of cellular waste is generated. For example, exposure to high light intensities in an oxygen-rich environment results in enhanced lipid peroxidation. Consequently, the retina is one of the tissues with the highest cell turnover rate, and accordingly requires high phagocytic activity for the clearance of aged photoreceptors, which are enriched in long-chain PUFAs. Both retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and microvascular endothelial cells express several scavenger receptors that mediate the clearance of apoptotic cells, cellular debris and oxidized lipids93. Indeed, rats with a deletion variant of CD36 exhibit impaired phagocytosis of photoreceptor rod outer segments94. Whereas anionic phospholipids on apoptotic cells have been suggested to mediate this binding95, mass spectrometry studies have shown that the exposure of rat retinal cells to light results in elevated levels of OxPLs96. Importantly, OxPL inhibited the uptake of rod outer segments by wild-type cells but not by Cd36−/− RPE cells. OSEs may also be involved in efferocytosis via MFG-E8, which binds OxPS exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells72. MFG-E8 facilitates engulfment by phagocytes via the αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin receptors, and has been shown to have an important role in the phagocytosis of photoreceptors of the outer segment97. Recent work has identified the 12/15-lipoxygenase product OxPE as a ligand for MFG-E8 with unique functional consequences in the context of apoptotic cell clearance during peritonitis73. In this study, OxPE that is exposed on the surface of alternatively activated macrophages led to the sequestration of MFG-E8, which favours the engulfment of apoptotic cells via phosphatidylserine receptors, such as T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 4 (TIM4), but blocks MFG-E8-dependent uptake of apoptotic cells by pro-inflammatory LY6Chi monocytes. Thus, in environments with high oxidative stress, the OSE-dependent clearance of cellular debris represents a physiological housekeeping function that directs the clearance of dying cells to specific pathways.

Accumulating evidence indicates that the recognition of OSEs may also be crucial for complement-mediated clearance mechanisms, particularly of late apoptotic and necrotic cells, including the activity of several complement proteins and receptors, such as CRP and natural IgM, as well as pentraxin83,98,99. Natural IgM antibodies are important in apoptotic cell clearance, as mice deficient in secreted IgM are more prone to developing autoimmunity when crossed with the lupus-prone MRL/lpr background100. To date, all characterized OSE-specific natural IgM antibodies have also been found to bind apoptotic cells, and the PC-specific T15/E06 IgM and the MDA-specific NA17 antibodies enhance the uptake of apoptotic cells in mice in vivo75,101. Interestingly, MDA and 4-HNE accumulate in the serum of aged MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice102. MDA and PC-OxPL have also been suggested to be dominant drivers in IgM-C1q-mediated efferocytosis by dendritic cells87. Moreover, the administration of T15/E06 protected arthritis-prone DBA1 mice from collagen-induced arthritis86, suggesting an anti-inflammatory potential of neutralizing PC-OxPL. As dying cells display different OSEs at the same time, IgM with different OSE specificity may have functionally additive effects. Similarly, CRP, which also binds apoptotic cells via PC-OxPL, enhances the clearance of dying cells in a complement-dependent manner103. Although CRP and IgM are potent activators of complement, their binding on apoptotic cell surfaces does not lead to terminal complement activation because this is limited by the recruitment of the soluble regulators CFH and C4 binding protein (C4BP)104. Importantly, recruitment of CFH to apoptotic blebs and to necrotic RPE cells can be mediated by MDA67 and other previously described ligands105. This might allow CFH to provide cofactor activity for factor I on dying cells to inactivate C3b into iC3b. The phagocytosis of dying cells that have been opsonized with iC3b can inhibit nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) transcription, and can thereby promote anti-inflammatory clearance by phagocytes106. Notably, CFH mediates cofactor activity on MDA-decorated surfaces, and MDA binding does not interfere with this process. Moreover, owing to its reduced MDA-binding capacity, the H402 variant of CFH displayed significantly impaired cofactor activity compared with the Y402 variant, which may result in the less efficient clearance of MDA-decorated structures and increased inflammation67,107. Interestingly, CFH was reported to slow down efferocytosis in vitro104,108, which is beneficial in circumstances that require decreased release of ROS, nitrogen intermediates and lysosomal enzymes by phagocytes108,109. During this process, additional complement-independent neutralizing functions of CFH and OSE-specific IgM may also be crucial to prevent potential pro-inflammatory effects of the OSEs that have not yet been cleared. For example, CFH blocks MDA-induced CXC-chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL8) and CXCL1 production in vitro and in vivo, respectively67.

Similarly, the MDA-specific IgM LR04 and the PC-specific IgM T15/E06 inhibited microvesicle-induced CXCL8 secretion in human monocytes and the activation of endothelial cells, respectively20,88. These findings provide insights into the important physiological function of OSE-specific immune responses in the recognition and neutralization of cellular debris in the circulation.

In summary, OSEs mark dying cells and their cellular debris and distinguish them from viable and healthy tissues. This enables specific humoral immune responses such as natural IgM antibodies to coordinate the safe disposal of dying cells with a regulated activation of the early steps of the complement cascade. In addition, scavenger receptors that bind to OSEs mediate efferocytosis. However, if the enhanced generation of dying cells exceeds the clearance capacity of available phagocytes, the OSEs present on the accumulating apoptotic cells mediate pro-inflammatory signals and may promote autoimmunity.

Innate sensing of OSEs in disease

During acute inflammatory conditions OSEs can trigger sterile inflammation to ultimately restore tissue integrity. However, under certain conditions, the balance between the generation and the clearance of OSEs by innate immune functions is lost owing to the increased generation of OSEs and/or dysfunctional innate immune responses, which leads to increased or chronic inflammation.

OSEs have been documented in diseased tissues of patients with, for example, infectious and sterile acute lung injury, atherosclerosis, hepatitis, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer disease31. The investigation of these diseases has provided important insights into the functional role of OSE-specific immunity in both acute and chronic inflammatory models.

Role of OSEs in acute inflammation. The OSE CEP transiently accumulates during acute inflammation in a mouse model of wound healing, and induces angiogenesis in endothelial cells in a TLR2–MYD88-dependent manner to stimulate wound healing and to protect against hindlimb ischaemia33,46. In this context, F4/80hi and alternatively activated macrophages scavenge and degrade accumulated CEP in a process that requires binding of both TLR2 and CD36 (Ref. 46). Notably, CEP accumulates in ageing tissues, which may lead to adverse consequences.

OSEs also accumulate in a wide variety of acute situations33,59,110. They accumulate in the lungs of mice following acute lung injury induced by sterile acid aspiration, as well as following infection with the avian influenza virus H5N1 (Ref. 51). The pulmonary lavage fluid of injured mice contains OxPL that stimulates the production of IL-6 in macrophages, which can be ameliorated by the natural IgM antibody T15/E06. Administration of OxPL promoted acute lung injury in mice in a TLR4- and TRIF-dependent manner. In addition to PC-OxPL, MDA adducts also formed in the lungs of these mice51, and intranasal administration of MDA-modified bovine serum albumin (BSA) induced CXCL1 secretion and neutrophil recruitment into the lungs111. This is consistent with the capacity of MDA-adducts to trigger chemokine secretion in macrophages, and further demonstrates the pro-inflammatory potential of OSEs in vivo. Notably, both PC-OxPL and MDA have been documented in the lung tissues of patients who have died of H5N1 and SARS infections and in mice infected with lethal pathogens such as H5N1, Bacillus anthracis, SARS coronavirus and Yersinia pestis51.

Role of OSEs in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis is the prototypical chronic inflammatory disease in which the innate immune responses to OSEs are involved (Fig. 3). It is characterized by the deposition of LDL in the intima of large and medium-sized arteries, and the LDL subsequently undergoes oxidation to generate OxLDL. OSEs on OxLDL not only mediate uptake by macrophages to generate foam cells but also mediate many of the chronic inflammatory events that lead to the development of plaques. If plaques rupture, they can trigger thrombus formation, resulting in severe clinical manifestations such as myocardial infarction and stroke112.

Figure 3: Sensing of OSEs in atherosclerosis.
figure 3

Endothelial cells sense oxidation-specific epitopes (OSEs) present on microvesicles and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL)20,114. This results in the expression of adhesion molecules and the secretion of chemoattractants leading to monocyte recruitment to the intima of the artery wall. Macrophages internalize OxLDL via scavenger receptors such as scavenger receptor A1 (SRA1), lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor 1 (LOX1), SRB1 and CD36 (Ref. 37), and in cooperation with Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4–TLR6 receive pro-inflammatory signals from OSEs. The enhanced uptake of OxLDL via scavenger receptors leads to the excess accumulation of intracellular cholesterol and the formation of lipid-laden foam cells, as well as the secretion of cytokines and chemokines. Excessive free cholesterol accumulation induces cholesterol crystal formation that triggers lysosome rupture and activation of the NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome120 primed by pro-inflammatory OSE-induced signalling. Free intracellular cholesterol also induces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, leading to macrophage apoptosis. As a consequence of this, and impaired efferocytosis, late-stage apoptotic cells accumulate, contributing — together with OxLDL and microvesicles — to a growing pool of OSEs inside the plaque. Natural IgM specific for OSEs blocks scavenger receptor-mediated uptake and neutralizes the pro-inflammatory effects of OSEs by promoting their complement-dependent clearance. Complement factor H (CFH) blocks the pro-inflammatory effects of malondialdehyde (MDA) and facilitates the anti-inflammatory clearance of MDA-decorated surfaces through Factor I-dependent iC3b generation67. The milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8 (MFG-E8) is also involved in the clearance of OSEs by recognizing oxidized phosphatidylserine (OxPS). Impaired functions of these humoral immune responses as a result of low abundance or decreased binding capacities, as well as excessive accumulation of OxLDL, microvesicles and apoptotic cells, favours the recognition of OSEs by macrophage receptors, leading to sustained inflammation. CRP, C-reactive protein; CXCL8, CXC-chemokine ligand 8; HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; PC-OxPL, phosphocholine (PC) of oxidized phospholipid.

PowerPoint slide

PC-OxPL, MDA, 4-HNE, OxCE and CEP have all been documented in atherosclerotic lesions in humans and in animal models of disease46,76,113,114,115. Endothelial cells and macrophages — which express different sets of scavenger receptors and TLRs — are major cellular sensors of OSEs in atherosclerosis. OxPLs induce the expression of chemoattractants, such as CC-chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2; also known as MCP1), fibronectin containing connecting segment 1, CXCL8 and P-selectin, and also trigger monocyte binding to endothelial cells23, which is partly mediated by TLR4 (Ref. 116). 4-HNE also induces ERK1/2 and NF-κB activation in endothelial cells via LOX1 (Ref. 50). LOX1 deficiency results in decreased lesion formation in Ldlr−/− mice117. CEP may also trigger a pro-atherogenic endothelial cell response via TLR2 (Ref. 33). The expression of TLR2 is increased in endothelial cells at sites of disturbed blood flow, and TLR2 deficiency in non-haematopoietic tissues reduces atherosclerosis in Ldlr−/− mice118. Thus, OSE sensing by endothelial cells is a key response in the development of atherosclerosis. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that CEP accelerates platelet activation and thrombus formation in hyperlipidaemic Apoe−/− mice in a TLR2-dependent manner56, indicating a role for OSEs in triggering the clinical events that result from atherosclerosis.

A hallmark of atherosclerotic lesions is the formation of lipid-laden macrophages, known as foam cells, which occurs because of the enhanced uptake of OxLDL mediated by OSE binding to scavenger receptors, such as CD36 and SRA1 (Ref. 119). The enhanced uptake of cholesterol-rich LDL and subsequent inefficient removal of intracellular cholesterol can lead to a situation of supersaturation of cholesterol, leading to the formation of cholesterol crystals that damage lysosomes and that activate the NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, resulting in IL-1β secretion120. Indeed, cholesterol loading of macrophages with OxLDL induces IL-1β secretion, and Ldlr−/− mice reconstituted with NLRP3-deficient bone marrow develop less atherosclerosis120. Moreover, deficiency of CD36 and/or SRA1 in Apoe−/− and Ldlr−/− mice, respectively, reduces the size and/or complexity of lesions compared with control mice119. In addition, binding of OxLDL to CD36 induces chemokine expression and inflammasome priming through NF-κB activation, which is dependent on heterotrimer formation with TLR4–TLR6 (Refs 53,121). TLR4 signalling is important, as Tlr4−/−Apoe−/− mice exhibit significantly reduced lesion size122, and clinical studies have found an SNP in TLR4, which results in impaired signalling, to be associated with reduced plaque burden and acute coronary events123,124. These studies demonstrate that sensing of OSEs, and in particular PC-OxPL, by CD36 is central to several pro-atherogenic responses in macrophages. OxLDL, as well as excessive foam cell formation, induces macrophage apoptosis, which is observed in advanced atherosclerotic lesions125. As a result of inefficient efferocytosis, apoptotic macrophages accumulate, which results in increased plaque necrosis and long-term atherosclerotic burden. Several studies demonstrate that deficiencies in certain proteins or receptors that mediate efferocytosis enhance lesion formation in atherosclerosis-prone mice125. Furthermore, the accumulation of apoptotic macrophages within lesions, and their released microvesicles, which all bear OSEs, may compete with both OxLDL and apoptotic cells for clearance by macrophages and thereby further impair efferocytosis.

Humoral immune responses are increasingly being recognized as important modulators of atherogenesis126. Although the ability of CRP to bind OSEs and to mediate apoptotic cell clearance suggests a role in atherosclerosis, there is no real support for an active role of CRP itself in the pathogenesis of the disease from animal or human studies127,128. However, CRP is an excellent biomarker of inflammation, and increased levels of CRP independently predict manifestations of atherosclerosis64. By contrast, natural IgM antibodies clearly modulate atherosclerotic lesion formation, as deficiency in secreted IgM promotes atherosclerosis in Ldlr−/− mice126. As many natural IgM antibodies bind OSEs75, their atheroprotective function may be mostly mediated by OSE-specific IgM, which includes housekeeping mechanisms and other protective effects. For example, T15/E06 IgM neutralizes the pro-inflammatory effects on endothelial cells and macrophages of late apoptotic cells and/or blebs carrying PC-OxPL17,51,88. T15/E06 IgM antibodies have also been shown to block the binding and uptake of OxLDL in macrophages, preventing foam cell formation77. Importantly, raising plasma levels of T15/E06 IgM by immunization with PC-containing pneumococcal extracts or passive infusion decreased atherosclerosis in Ldlr−/− mice and vein graft atherosclerosis in Apoe−/− mice, respectively129,130. In analogy to PC-OxPL, MDA-epitopes also trigger tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and CXCL8 in monocytes and macrophages67. In addition, the numbers of MDA-positive microvesicles substantially increased at the culprit lesion sites of patients suffering from an acute coronary event compared with the number found in peripheral circulation, which could further propagate inflammation20. Thus, OSE-specific IgM can protect by neutralizing the pro-inflammatory effects of OSEs in the context of OxLDL, microvesicles and apoptotic cells, and can promote the anti-inflammatory clearance of cellular debris. In line with this, several clinical studies have shown that lower levels of IgM antibodies directed against MDA-LDL and OxLDL are linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)126.

Our recent identification of CFH as a major MDA-binding protein in plasma also suggests its potential involvement in atherosclerosis67. CFH is present in human atherosclerotic lesions, where it localizes to areas rich in MDA-epitopes67,131. Although several studies have reported an association of the 402H allele — which decreases binding of CFH to MDA — with an increased risk of heart disease and stroke, a meta-analysis of eight different study populations failed to find a significant association of this gene variant with CVD132. However, to fully understand this function of CFH in CVD, the net contribution of all SNPs that potentially affect MDA binding needs to be explored.

These data support an important role for immune responses that target OSEs in atherogenesis. OxLDL and cellular debris contribute to an excessive accumulation of OSEs, which cannot be adequately targeted by beneficial clearance mechanisms and, consequently, pro-inflammatory responses in macrophages and endothelial cells are sustained. Similarly, OSEs may promote non-alcoholic steatohepatitis133, which is increasingly being recognized as a risk factor for CVD. Studies in cholesterol-fed Ldlr−/− mice indicate that the expression of CD36 and SRA1 in Kupffer cells mediates hepatic inflammation134, whereas inducing plasma levels of the T15/E06 IgM is protective135. Consistent with these data, we recently showed that deficiency of sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectin G (Siglec-G), a negative regulator of B-1 cell function, results in increased levels of OSE-specific IgM and reduced atherosclerosis and hepatic inflammation in cholesterol-fed Ldlr−/− mice136.

OSEs in AMD. OSEs have also been implicated in AMD137, which is characterized by the accumulation of cellular waste (drusen) in the retina. Several OSEs, including PC-OxPLs, and MDA- and CEP-modified proteins, have been identified as drusen components and have been shown to trigger sterile inflammation138. For example, CEP-modified proteins induce pro-inflammatory gene expression and prime the NLRP3 inflammasome in monocytes via TLR2 (Refs 55,139). Drusen extracts isolated from AMD lesions activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, resulting in the secretion of IL-1β and IL-18 (Ref. 139). Similarly, MDA-modified proteins induce the expression of CXCL8 and CXCL1 in RPE cells in in vitro and in vivo models, respectively67. Dysregulation of complement represents another major pathological driver of AMD, and genome-wide association studies have identified SNPs in genes encoding complement proteins as genetic risk factors of AMD69,137. Among these, the SNP rs1061170 in CFH predisposes to increased risk for AMD140,141. Necrotic RPE cells and blebs thereof display MDA-epitopes that are recognized by CFH, which in turn facilitates the generation of iC3b for opsonization and anti-inflammatory removal. Compared with the Y402 CFH variant, the cofactor activity on MDA-decorated surfaces is severely impaired when the 402H CFH variant is used, demonstrating a functional consequence. As a result, MDA may accumulate and promote inflammation67. Indeed, transgenic mice that express the human 402H variant have increased susceptibility to oxidative stress-mediated injury in the retina as a result of MDA accumulation and increased inflammation142.

Conclusions and future directions

The recognition of OSEs by cellular and humoral immune responses enables the immune system to mediate important housekeeping functions, such as the removal of dying cells, cellular debris and damaged molecules. In situations of increased oxidative stress, the generation and burden of OSEs is greatly increased. As a consequence, OSEs are sensed by cellular signalling receptors, leading to the secretion of chemokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Thus, OSEs represent a unique class of DAMPs, which both mediate the recognition of cellular debris for housekeeping functions and, under certain circumstances, act as pro-inflammatory danger signals themselves. When this fine balance between the presence of OSEs and the capacities of the immune system to survey and respond to them is lost owing to the excessive generation of OSEs and/or their impaired removal, the development and propagation of chronic inflammatory diseases become manifest.

Although there have been a few attempts to treat patients with antioxidants to reduce the progression of CVD, these have not been successful143. These very limited studies have been criticized as premature as we currently lack sufficient knowledge to adequately design an effective therapeutic trial to test the role of oxidation in atherogenesis26. As discussed in this Review, oxidative events and the associated immune responses have beneficial effects as well as adverse consequences and we currently lack insight into the relative importance of these in vivo, which could affect the proper design of antioxidant trials.

A better understanding of the role of OSEs and OSE-reactive immune responses in the maintenance of homeostasis and in controlling inflammation are important areas of future investigations. Moreover, it is important to elucidate how different components of OSE-specific immune responses cooperate at a functional level. The identification of the genetic variants that affect some of these responses, and mechanistic studies characterizing these, may provide exciting insights into different individual predispositions to responding to oxidative stress and to developing chronic inflammation.