Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

MRI in Crohn's disease—current and future clinical applications

This article has been updated

Abstract

Crohn's disease is a chronic, disabling disease that, over time, can lead to irreversible bowel damage. MRI can be used to diagnose and assess the activity, severity and complications of Crohn's disease; however, the role of MRI in therapeutic monitoring of changes in disease-related intestinal damage is still to be defined. Objective, validated MRI-based scores have been developed to assess the activity of Crohn's disease; these indices are based on the extent and severity of intestinal inflammation, postoperative recurrence and perianal disease. MRI is accurate, safe, reproducible and can allow repeated evaluations of patients without radiation exposure. Evidence that MRI might be valuable in the therapeutic monitoring of patients with Crohn's disease is increasing and, in combination with endoscopy and surgical history, this imaging technique could enable clinicians to assess Crohn's-disease-related intestinal damage. MRI could, therefore, have a crucial role in a future 'damage-driven' treatment paradigm—in which imaging is used to monitor intestinal damage and medication use is targeted to prevent the accumulation of further damage. This damage-driven therapeutic approach could potentially change the course of Crohn's disease.

Key Points

  • MRI is a useful tool to integrate with endoscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Crohn's disease

  • Combining MRI findings and endoscopic examination results could provide detailed information on the presence and progression of bowel-wall involvement and extravisceral manifestations in patients with Crohn's disease

  • MRI can be used to assess the activity, severity and complications of Crohn's disease, and is a noninvasive method of detecting perianal disease, postoperative recurrence and fibrosis

  • Several objective MRI-based scores have been validated, which could be used to assess the response of patients with Crohn's disease to specific medications

  • MRI could have a crucial role in evaluating Crohn's-disease-related intestinal damage and monitoring the evolution of the disease

  • The use of MRI in therapeutic monitoring might change the treatment paradigm from a symptom-driven to a damage-driven approach, which could alter the course of the disease

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: MRI scan from a patient with active luminal disease.
Figure 2: Coronal view in T1-weighted sequence fat-suppressed in one patient with fibrotic Crohn's disease.
Figure 3: Pelvic MRI scan from a patient with Crohn's disease and a perianal draining fistula.
Figure 4: MRI scan from a patient with postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 09 December 2011

    In the version of this article initially published online references 50–52 were incorrectly cited in the section 'New MRI techniques and uses'. These references should have been 33, 79 and 80, respectively. The error has been corrected for the print, HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Peyrin-Biroulet, L. et al. Development of the first disability index for inflammatory bowel disease based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Gut http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300049.

  2. Cosnes, J. et al. Long-term evolution of disease behavior of Crohn's disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 8, 244–250 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Loftus, E. V. Jr, Colombel, J. F. & Sandborn, W. J. The natural history of adult Crohn's disease in population-based cohorts. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 289–297 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cosnes, J., Gower-Rousseau, C., Seksik, P. & Cortot, A. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140, 1785–1794 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pariente, B., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Cohen, L., Zagdanski, A. M. & Colombel, J. F. Gastroenterology review and perspective: the role of cross-sectional imaging in evaluating bowel damage in crohn disease. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 197, 42–49 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Z. et al. Reciprocal changes of Foxp3 expression in blood and intestinal mucosa in IBD patients responding to infliximab. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 16, 1299–1310 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shrot, S., Konen, E., Hertz, M. & Amitai, M. M. Magnetic resonance enterography: 4 years experience in a tertiary medical center. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 13, 172–177 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sinha, R., Verma, R., Verma, S. & Rajesh, A. MR enterography of Crohn disease: part 1, rationale, technique, and pitfalls. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 197, 76–79 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ajaj, W. et al. Small bowel hydro-MR imaging for optimized ileocecal distension in Crohn's disease: should an additional rectal enema filling be performed? J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22, 92–100 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gourtsoyiannis, N. C., Papanikolaou, N. & Karantanas, A. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of small intestinal Crohn's disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 20, 137–156 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Panés, J. et al. Systematic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn's disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 34, 125–145 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horsthuis, K., Bipat, S., Bennink, R. J. & Stoker, J. Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology 247, 64–79 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bodily, K. D. et al. Crohn disease: mural attenuation and thickness at contrast-enhanced CT enterography—correlation with endoscopic and histologic findings of inflammation. Radiology 238, 505–516 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Low, R. N. et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 222, 652–660 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rimola, J. et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Gut 58, 1113–1120 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Assche, G. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 98, 332–339 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rimola, J. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn's disease: validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 17, 1759–1768 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sailer, J. et al. Anastomotic recurrence of Crohn's disease after ileocolic resection: comparison of MR enteroclysis with endoscopy. Eur. Radiol. 18, 2512–2521 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Masselli, G., Casciani, E., Polettini, E. & Gualdi, G. Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn's disease. Eur. Radiol. 18, 438–447 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kroeker, K. I., Lam, S., Birchall, I. & Fedorak, R. N. Patients with IBD are exposed to high levels of ionizing radiation through CT scan diagnostic imaging: a five-year study. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 45, 34–39 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuchs, Y. et al. Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and imaging-related radiation: are we increasing the likelihood of malignancy? J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 52, 280–285 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forbes, A. & Reading, N. G. Review article: the risks of malignancy from either immunosuppression or diagnostic radiation in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 9, 465–470 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brenner, D. J. et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13761–13766 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Assche, G. et al. The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: definitions and diagnosis. J. Crohns Colitis 4, 7–27 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mary, J. Y. & Modigliani, R. Development and validation of an endoscopic index of the severity for Crohn's disease: a prospective multicentre study. Groupe d'Etudes Therapeutiques des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif (GETAID). Gut 30, 983–989 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ordás, I. et al. Accuracy of MRI to assess therapeutic responses and mucosal healing in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 140, S73 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pilleul, F. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 29, 803–808 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maccioni, F. et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology 238, 517–530 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, S. S. et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 251, 751–761 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Florie, J. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with ileocolonoscopy in evaluating disease severity in Crohn's disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 3, 1221–1228 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Masselli, G., Vecchioli, A. & Gualdi, G. F. Crohn disease of the small bowel: MR enteroclysis versus conventional enteroclysis. Abdom. Imaging 31, 400–409 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gee, M. S. et al. Prospective evaluation of MR enterography as the primary imaging modality for pediatric Crohn disease assessment. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 197, 224–231 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Giusti, S. et al. Dynamic MRI of the small bowel: usefulness of quantitative contrast-enhancement parameters and time-signal intensity curves for differentiating between active and inactive Crohn's disease. Abdom. Imaging 35, 646–653 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zappa, M. et al. Which magnetic resonance imaging findings accurately evaluate inflammation in small bowel Crohn's disease? A retrospective comparison with surgical pathologic analysis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 17, 984–993 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Aisen, A. M. Science to practice: can the diagnosis of fibrosis with magnetization contrast MR aid in the evaluation of patients with Crohn disease? Radiology 259, 1–3 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Adler, J. et al. Magnetization transfer helps detect intestinal fibrosis in an animal model of Crohn disease. Radiology 259, 127–135 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rutgeerts, P. et al. Natural history of recurrent Crohn's disease at the ileocolonic anastomosis after curative surgery. Gut 25, 665–672 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Koilakou, S. et al. Endoscopy and MR enteroclysis: equivalent tools in predicting clinical recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease after ileocolic resection. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 16, 198–203 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Beets-Tan, R. G. et al. Preoperative MR imaging of anal fistulas: Does it really help the surgeon? Radiology 218, 75–84 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Assche, G. et al. The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: special situations. J. Crohn's Colitis 4, 63–101 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Karmiris, K. et al. Long-term monitoring of infliximab therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease by using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 130–136 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tougeron, D. et al. Predicting factors of fistula healing and clinical remission after infliximab-based combined therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 54, 1746–1752 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Savoye-Collet, C., Savoye, G., Koning, E., Dacher, J. N. & Lerebours, E. Fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessment at 1 year on maintenance anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 17, 1751–1758 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ochsenkühn, T. et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum: detection by MR-enteroclysis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 39, 953–960 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dillman, J. R. et al. Comparison of MR enterography and histopathology in the evaluation of pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatr. Radiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2186-0.

  46. Albert, J. G. et al. Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis. Gut 54, 1721–1727 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tillack, C. et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) and wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) in the diagnosis of small bowel lesions in Crohn's disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 14, 1219–1228 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Low, R. N., Francis, I. R., Politoske, D. & Bennett, M. Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 11, 127–135 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Siddiki, H. A. et al. Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn's disease. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 193, 113–121 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Neurath, M. F. et al. Noninvasive assessment of Crohn's disease activity: a comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte scintigraphy with labeled antibodies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 97, 1978–1985 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hyun, S. B. et al. Magnetic resonance enterocolonography is useful for simultaneous evaluation of small and large intestinal lesions in Crohn's disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 17, 1063–1072 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Jensen, M. D., Nathan, T., Rafaelsen, S. R. & Kjeldsen, J. Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy for small bowel Crohn's disease is superior to that of MR enterography or CT enterography. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 124–129 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Parisinos, C. A. et al. Magnetic resonance follow-through imaging for evaluation of disease activity in ileal Crohn's disease: an observational, retrospective cohort study. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 16, 1219–1226 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Langhorst, J. et al. MR colonography without bowel purgation for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases: diagnostic accuracy and patient acceptance. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 13, 1001–1008 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Abujudeh, H. H., Kosaraju, V. K. & Kaewlai, R. Acute adverse reactions to gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine: experience with 32,659 injections. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 194, 430–434 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kribben, A. et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53, 1621–1628 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Collidge, T. A. et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: retrospective study of a renal replacement therapy cohort. Radiology 245, 168–175 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kanal, E. et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 1447–1474 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen, M. M., Coakley, F. V., Kaimal, A. & Laros, R. K. Jr. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet. Gynecol. 112, 333–340 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Chang, K. J., Kamel, I. R., Macura, K. J. & Bluemke, D. A. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics 28, 1983–1998 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rimola, J. et al. Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics 29, 701–709 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Fiorino, G. et al. A prospective comparison between 1.5T magnetic resonance and 3T magnetic resonance in ileo-colonic Crohn's disease: a single center experience. Gastroenterology 140, S-695 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Dagia, C., Ditchfield, M., Kean, M. & Catto-Smith, T. Imaging for Crohn disease: use of 3-T MRI in a paediatric setting. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 52, 480–488 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Oussalah, A. et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance without bowel preparation for detecting colonic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 59, 1056–1065 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Oto, A. et al. Evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection of bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease. Acad. Radiol. 16, 597–603 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Best, W. R., Becktel, J. M., Singleton, J. W. & Kern, F. Jr. Development of a Crohn's disease activity index. National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study. Gastroenterology 70, 439–444 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Harvey, R. F. & Bradshaw, J. M. A simple index of Crohn's-disease activity. Lancet 1, 1134–1135 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Daperno, M. et al. Development and validation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn's disease: the SES-CD. Gastrointest. Endosc. 60, 505–512 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lewis, J. D. The utility of biomarkers in the diagnosis and therapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 140, 1817–1826 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Van Assche, G. et al. Effects of infliximab therapy on transmural lesions assessed by MRI enteroclysis in patients with ileal Crohn's disease: The ACTIF Study. Gastroenterology 140, S-73 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sharp, J. T., Lidsky, M. D., Collins, L. C. & Moreland, J. Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities. Arthritis Rheum. 14, 706–720 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. van der Heijde, D. M. Plain X-rays in rheumatoid arthritis: overview of scoring methods, their reliability and applicability. Baillieres Clin. Rheumatol. 10, 435–453 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. van der Heijde, D. M. Joint erosions and patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Br. J. Rheumatol. 34, 74–78 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. St Clair, E. W. et al. Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 50, 3432–3443 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Bejarano, V. et al. The relationship between early bone mineral density changes and long term function and radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. (Hoboken) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.20553.

  76. Pariente, B. et al. Development of the Crohn's disease digestive damage score, the Lémann score. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 17, 1415–1422 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Loftus, E. V. Jr, Colombel, J. F. & Sandborn, W. J. Early Crohn disease: a proposed definition for use in disease-modification trials. Gut 59, 141–147 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. D'Haens, G. et al. Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease: an open randomised trial. Lancet 371, 660–667 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Taylor, S. A. et al. Mural Crohn disease: correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings with angiogenesis and inflammation at histologic examination—pilot study. Radiology 251, 369–379 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Horsthuis, K., Lavini, C., Bipat, S., Stokkers, P. C. & Stoker, J. Perianal Crohn disease: evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging as an indicator of disease activity. Radiology 251, 380–387 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G. Fiorino researched the data for the article. G. Fiorino, C. Bonifacio, L. Balzarini and S. Danese contributed to the discussions of the article content. G. Fiorino and S. Danese wrote the manuscript. G. Fiorino, C. Bonifacio, A. Malesci and S. Danese undertook review and/or editing of the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvio Danese.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiorino, G., Bonifacio, C., Malesci, A. et al. MRI in Crohn's disease—current and future clinical applications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9, 23–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.214

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.214

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing