We appreciate the comments relating to our Review article (The nitrate–nitrite–nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 156–167 (2008))1 from Nirmal Singh Panesar (Downsides to the nitrate–nitrite–nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics? Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 1 Aug 2008 (doi:10.1038/nrd2466-c1))2. As stated in our Review, hypoxia is certainly not a prerequisite for nitrite reduction to nitric oxide (NO); this process occurs along the physiological deoxygenation gradient1. In fact, in our own previous studies we noted vasodilation under normoxic conditions in aortic rings3 and in nitrite infusion studies in humans, during which there is physiological deoxygenation across tissue beds4,5. In addition, in studies using dietary nitrate we have observed a reduction in blood pressure in normoxic individuals6. Although we fully agree with Panesar that nitrite is bioactivated in vivo along the physiological oxygen gradient, it is clear from both in vitro studies of the enzymology of the haemoglobins7 and xanthine oxidoreductase8, and in vivo studies in animals9,10and humans4,11 that nitrite-dependent signalling is potentiated as oxygen tensions decrease. This provides for graded NO production during physiological and pathological hypoxia. Mixed venous oxygen tensions represent a 'step up' in oxygen from specific organ oxygen tensions, secondary to mixing of all systemic blood flow. For example, the coronary sinus PaO2 is only 19 mm Hg at rest (haemoglobin oxygen saturation of less than 50%), and similar oxygen extraction occurs across skeletal muscle, kidney and brain. Thus, the in vivo vasodilatory effects of nitrite occur in a system that efficiently extracts oxygen across resistance vessels at rest12.

With regard to NO and angina pectoris, the endogenous mechanisms for vasodilation are not sufficient when vascular occlusion is severe, and, in such cases, pharmacological treatment with organic nitrates, for example, may be necessary. It would be interesting to study whether therapeutic increases in circulating nitrite levels, by dietary or pharmacological interventions, could help to delay the onset of angina. We disagree about the controversy in circulating nitrite levels. Indeed, in early studies, some very high levels have been reported, but they most probably reflect the sum of nitrate and nitrite rather than only nitrite. Numerous more recent studies using different highly sensitive techniques have clearly showed that normal plasma nitrite levels in humans are in the range 50–500 nM and very seldom above 1 μM1.

The possible interaction between the nitrate–nitrite–NO pathway and steroid hormones is interesting and clearly merits further study. Apart from the studies cited by Panesar, such interaction is also supported by a very recent study in which nitrate and nitrite were shown to potently activate oestrogen receptor-α13. In addition, nitrate may also affect the thyroid gland by interfering with iodine transport14. However, the significance of these possible negative interactions with endocrine functions remains to be established, and the numerous epidemiological studies in humans performed over the past 40 years do not support any major negative health effects of a diet that is high in nitrate14.