Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Lung cancer

Stage III NSCLC — is it time to centralize care?

Eaton et al. report a very strong association between institutional clinical trial accrual volume and the survival of patients with stage III NSCLC. The observed volume effect might have been exaggerated by artefact. More work is required to quantify the volume effect and understand its causes, before rushing to centralize care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Luft, H. S., Bunker, J. P. & Enthoven, A. C. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 301, 1364–1369 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  2. von Meyenfeldt, E. M. et al. The relationship between volume or surgeon specialty and outcome in the surgical treatment of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Thorac. Oncol. 7, 1170–1178 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lüchtenborg, M. et al. High procedure volume is strongly associated with improved survival after lung cancer surgery. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 3141–3146 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cancer Care Ontario. Thoracic Cancer Surgery Standards. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/cms/one.aspx?pageId=41173 (2009).

  5. Eaton, B. R. et al. Institutional enrollment and survival among NSCLC patients receiving chemoradiation: NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 108, djw034 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, J. S., Scott, C. B., Komaki, R., Ettinger, D. S. & Sause, W. T. Impact of institutional experience on the survival outcome of patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 52, 362–370 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alberti, W. et al. Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. BMJ 311, 899–909 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wuthrick, E. J. et al. Institutional clinical trial accrual volume and survival of patients with head and neck cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 156–164 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, E. H. et al. Patients selected for definitive concurrent chemoradiation at high-volume facilities achieve improved survival in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 10, 937–943 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rochon, J., du Bois, A. & Lange, T. Mediation analysis of the relationship between institutional research activity and patient survival. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 14, 9 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. Mackillop.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mackillop, W., Booth, C. Stage III NSCLC — is it time to centralize care?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13, 657–658 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.160

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.160

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing