Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Lung cancer

CT screening for lung cancer—do we have an answer?

Concerns still exist regarding the best use of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer and how to select high-risk individuals who will benefit most from participation in screening programmes. Two studies now indicate factors that may reduce the false-positive rate of lung cancer screening with low-dose CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Aberle, D. R. et al. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 920–931 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Henschke, C. I. et al. Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 158, 246–252 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McWilliams, A. et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 910–919 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenberg, A. K. et al. CT scan screening for lung cancer: risk factors for nodules and malignancy in a high-risk urban cohort. PLoS ONE 7, e39403 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sverzellati, N. et al. Increased mean lung density: another independent predictor of lung cancer? Eur. J. Radiol. 82, 1325–1331 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gierada, D. S. et al. Quantitative CT assessment of emphysema and airways in relation to lung cancer risk. Radiology 261, 950–959 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Field, J. K., Oudkerk, M., Pedersen, J. H. & Duffy, S. W. Prospects for population screening and diagnosis of lung cancer. Lancet 382, 732–741 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Klaveren, R. J. et al. Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 2221–2229 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Heuvelmans, M. A. et al. Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals. Eur. Radiol. 23, 1836–1845 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaklitsch, M. T. et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 144, 33–38 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugo Pastorino.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pastorino, U., Sverzellati, N. CT screening for lung cancer—do we have an answer?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10, 672–673 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.198

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.198

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer