Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Science and Society
  • Published:

Quality of life: a new perspective for cancer patients

Abstract

Quality of life (QoL) research provides patients and health-care providers with vital information about the impact that disease and its treatment has on physical, functional, social and emotional well-being. QoL outcomes are also being recognized as important prognostic variables, which help to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment. Nevertheless, many remain unreasonably sceptical about the scientific rigour and value of the assessment tools that are available. So how can QoL be measured, and how can this be used for the benefit of patients?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Fallowfield, L. J. in The Quality of Life: The Missing Measurement in Health Care 234 (Souvenir Press, London, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M. & Gandek, B. SF36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. (New England Medical Centre, Boston, Massachusetts, 1993).

  3. Aaronson, N. K. et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 85, 365–376 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cella, D. F. et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J. Clin. Oncol. 11, 570–579 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McQuellon, R. P. et al. Quality of life measurement in bone marrow transplantation: development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) scale. Bone Marrow Transplant. 19, 357–368 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cella, D. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Scale: a new tool for the assessment of outcomes in cancer anemia and fatigue. Semin. Hematol. 34 (Suppl. 2), 13–19 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Streiner, D. L. & Norman, G. R. in Health Measurement Scales 175 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bowling, A. Research Methods in Health. Investigating Health and Health Services (Open Univ. Press, Buckingham, UK, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The ATAC Trialists' Group. Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trial. Lancet 359, 2131–2139 (2002).

  10. Fallowfield, L. J. et al. Assesment of quality of life in women undergoing hormonal therapy for breast cancer: validation of an endocrine subscale for the FACT-B. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 55, 189–199 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coster, S., Poole, K. & Fallowfield, L. J. The validation of a quality of life scale to assess the impact of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients post-operatively. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 68, 273–282 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saunders, C. M. & Fallowfield, L. J. Survey of the attitudes to and use of quality of life measures by breast cancer specialists in the UK. Breast 5, 425–426 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fallowfield, L. J. Quality of quality-of-life data. Lancet 348, 421–422 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernhard, J. et al. Missing quality of life data in cancer clinical trials: serious problems and challenges. Stat. Med. 17, 517–532 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders, C. et al. Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study. BMJ 317, 1191–1194 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fallowfield, L. J. et al. The effects of breast conservation on the psychological morbidity associated with the diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer. BMJ 293, 1331–1334 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moyer, A. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 16, 284–298 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fallowfield, L. J. et al. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ 301, 575–580 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer, T. J. & Mark, M. M. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patient: a meta analysis of randomised experiments. Health Psychol. 14, 101–108 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheard, T. & Maguire, P. The effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: results of two meta-analyses. Br. J. Cancer 80, 1770–1780 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fallowfield, L. et al. Positive epoetin alfa effect on quality of life in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: results from a randomized placebo–controlled trial. Eur. J. Cancer 35, 1461 (1999).

  22. Coates, A. & Gebski, V. On the receiving end. VI. Which dimensions of quality-of-life scores carry prognostic information? Cancer Treat. Rev. 22 (Suppl. A), 63–67 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Earlam, S. et al. Relation between tumor size, quality of life, and survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. J. Clin. Oncol. 14, 171–175 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maisey, N. R. et al. Baseline quality of life predicts survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 38, 1351–1357 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fraser, S. C. A. et al. A daily diary for quality of life measurement in advanced breast cancer trials. Br. J. Cancer 67, 341–346 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Brady, M. J. et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J. Clin. Oncol. 15, 974–986 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coster, S. & Fallowfield, L. The impact of endocrine therapy on patients with breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast 11, 1–12 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Klastersky, J. & Paesmans, M. Response to chemotherapy, quality of life benefits and survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: review of literature results. Lung Cancer 34 (Suppl. 4), S95–S101 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Feeny, D. et al. Multi-attribute health-status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 7, 490–502 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rabin, R. & de Charro, F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann. Med. 33, 337–343 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Carr-Hill, R. Current practice in obtaining the 'Q' in QALYs: a cautionary note. BMJ 303, 699–701 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gelber, R. D., Goldhirsch, A. & Cole, B. F. Evaluation of effectiveness: Q-TWiST. The International Breast Cancer Study Group. Cancer Treat. Rev. 19 (Suppl. A), 73–84 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Griffin, A. M. et al. On the receiving end. V: Patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy in 1993. Ann. Oncol. 7, 189–195 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lachaine, J. et al. Cost-effectiveness and quality of life evaluation of ondansetron and metoclopramide for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 32, 105–112 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Velikova, G. et al. Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 998–1007 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fayers, P. M. & Machin, D. in Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation 404 (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

Cancer.gov

breast cancer

colorectal cancer

lung cancer

melanoma

LocusLink

erythropoietin-α

FURTHER INFORMATION

qolid.org

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fallowfield, L. Quality of life: a new perspective for cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer 2, 873–879 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc930

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing