Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Genomic systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (Genomic SELEX) for the identification of protein-binding RNAs independent of their expression levels

Abstract

Genomic systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (Genomic SELEX) is an experimental procedure for the expression condition-independent identification of protein-binding RNAs. RNA libraries derived from genomic DNA are generated via random priming, PCR amplification and in vitro transcription. Libraries consist of genomic sequences of selected size, and fragments are flanked by constant sequences required for amplification and transcription. This RNA pool is then subjected to several rounds of selection and amplification to enrich for RNAs meeting the selection criteria. Various selection criteria are possible. Here we describe selection by affinity to a protein of interest. High-affinity ligands can then be cloned and sequenced to allow their identification. With this method, protein-binding RNAs can be discovered, nucleic acid–protein interactions can be identified, and whole protein–nucleic acid networks can be defined. This method is also suitable for discovering novel genes, including non-protein-coding RNAs, and it complements in silico approaches. It is better suited to detect protein-binding RNAs that are differentially expressed (and therefore absent from many tissues) and low-abundance RNAs than experimental procedures that start from the isolation of expressed RNAs. The protocol takes 3 months to complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Overview of the SELEX process.
Figure 2: Schematic representation of the construction of a genomic library.
Figure 3: Schematic representation of filtration apparatus.
Figure 4: Example of the enrichment of genomic RNA sequences from the E. coli genome that bind to the E. coli protein Hfq.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tuerk, C. & Gold, L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 249, 505–510 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gold, L., Polisky, B., Uhlenbeck, O.C. & Yarus, M. Diversity of oligonucleotide functions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 763–797 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellington, A.D. & Szostak, J.W. In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligands. Nature 346, 818–822 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singer, B., Shtatland, T., Brown, D. & Gold, L. Libraries for genomic SELEX. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 781–786 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimida, T., Fujita, N., Maeda, M. & Ishihama, A. Systematic search for the Cra-binding promoters using genomic SELEX system. Genes Cells 10, 907–918 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shtatland, T. et al. Interactions of Escherichia coli RNA with bacteriophage MS2 coat proteins: genomic SELEX. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, e93 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, K., Shi, H., Lee, D.-K. & Lis, J.T. Specific SR protein-dependent splicing substrates identified through genomic SELEX. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1955–1961 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mattick, J.S. Non-coding RNAs: the architects of eukaryotic complexity. EMBO Rep. 2, 986–991 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuschl, T. Functional genomics: RNA sets the standard. Nature 421, 220–221 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mattick, J.S. The functional genomics of noncoding RNA. Science 309, 1527–1528 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Washietl, S., Hofacker, I.L. & Stadler, P.F. Fast and reliable prediction of noncoding RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2454–2459 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eddy, S.R. Computational genomics of noncoding RNA genes. Cell 109, 137–140 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huettenhofer, A. & Vogel, J. Experimental approaches to identify non-coding RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 781–786 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wen, J.-D. & Gray, D.M. Selection of genomic sequences that bind tightly to Ff gene 5 protein: primer-free genomic SELEX. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e182 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, A. et al. Global analysis of small RNA and mRNA targets of Hfq. Mol. Microbiol. 50, 1111–1124 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sambrook, J. & Russel, D. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work in our laboratory is funded by the Austrian Science Fund (projects Z-72 and F1703), the Austrian BMBWK GenAu program and the European Community Research BACRNA FP6-018618.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.L. described the construction of the library, F.v.P. described the selection procedure, and R.S. authored the introduction and anticipated results sections.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renée Schroeder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorenz, C., von Pelchrzim, F. & Schroeder, R. Genomic systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (Genomic SELEX) for the identification of protein-binding RNAs independent of their expression levels. Nat Protoc 1, 2204–2212 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.372

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.372

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing