Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks

Nature Plants volume 2, Article number: 16150 (2016) Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The 7.4 million plant accessions in gene banks are largely underutilized due to various resource constraints, but current genomic and analytic technologies are enabling us to mine this natural heritage. Here we report a proof-of-concept study to integrate genomic prediction into a broad germplasm evaluation process. First, a set of 962 biomass sorghum accessions were chosen as a reference set by germplasm curators. With high throughput genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), we genetically characterized this reference set with 340,496 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A set of 299 accessions was selected as the training set to represent the overall diversity of the reference set, and we phenotypically characterized the training set for biomass yield and other related traits. Cross-validation with multiple analytical methods using the data of this training set indicated high prediction accuracy for biomass yield. Empirical experiments with a 200-accession validation set chosen from the reference set confirmed high prediction accuracy. The potential to apply the prediction model to broader genetic contexts was also examined with an independent population. Detailed analyses on prediction reliability provided new insights into strategy optimization. The success of this project illustrates that a global, cost-effective strategy may be designed to assess the vast amount of valuable germplasm archived in 1,750 gene banks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Study design and genetic characterization of the sorghum population.
Figure 2: Selective phenotyping and cross-validation.
Figure 3: Relationship between biomass yield and three other traits.
Figure 4: Prediction accuracy from empirical validation experiments.
Figure 5: Prediction extrapolation to an independent population.
Figure 6: Upper bound for reliability (U) and the predicted Yield.
Figure 7: Turbocharging gene banks through genomic selection.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerland, P. et al. World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science 346, 234–237 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoisington, D. et al. Plant genetic resources: what can they contribute toward increased crop productivity? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5937–5943 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zamir, D. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 983–989 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanksley, S. D. & McCouch, S. R. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277, 1063–1066 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Houle, D., Govindaraju, D. R. & Omholt, S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 855–866 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrell, P. L., Buckler, E. S. & Ross-Ibarra, J. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 85–96 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, S., Zhu, D. & Zhang, Q. Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12456–12461 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Riedelsheimer, C. et al. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat. Genet. 44, 217–220 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de los Campos, G., Gianola, D. & Allison, D. B. Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 880–886 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Varshney, R. K. et al. Can genomics boost productivity of orphan crops? Nat. Biotech. 30, 1172–1176 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McCouch, S. et al. Agriculture: Feeding the future. Nature 499, 23–24 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paterson, A. H. et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457, 551–556 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Davey, J. W. et al. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 499–510 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elshire, R. J. et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6, e19379 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Thurber, C. S., Ma, J. M., Higgins, R. H. & Brown, P. J. Retrospective genomic analysis of sorghum adaptation to temperate-zone grain production. Genome Biol. 14, R68 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris, G. P. et al. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 453–458 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Darvasi, A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nat. Genet. 18, 19–24 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morota, G. & Gianola, D. Kernel-based whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a review. Front. Genet. 5, 363 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wray, N. R. et al. Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 507–515 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaitlen, N. et al. Leveraging population admixture to characterize the heritability of complex traits. Nat. Genet. 46, 1356–1362 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dekkers, J. C. M. Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124, 331–341 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tester, M. & Langridge, P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327, 818–822 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. VanRaden, P. M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 4414–4423 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karaman, E., Cheng, H., Firat, M. Z., Garrick, D. J. & Fernando, R. L. An upper bound for accuracy of prediction using GBLUP. PLoS ONE 11, e0161054 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Harnessing the power of crop diversity to feed the future White Paper (DivSeek, 2014).

  26. Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernardo, R. & Yu, J. Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47, 1082–1090 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heffner, E. L., Sorrells, M. E. & Jannink, J. L. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49, 1–12 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Crossa, J. et al. Genomic prediction in CIMMYT maize and wheat breeding programs. Heredity 112, 48–60 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spindel, J. et al. Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004982 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Akdemir, D., Sanchez, J. I. & Jannink, J. L. Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm. Genet. Sel. Evol. 47, 38 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Isidro, J. et al. Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 145–158 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rincent, R. et al. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.). Genetics 192, 715–728 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J. M. & van Eeuwijk, F. A. The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front. Physiol. 4, 44 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Technow, F., Messina, C. D., Totir, L. R. & Cooper, M. Integrating crop growth models with whole genome prediction through approximate bayesian computation. PLoS ONE 10, e0130855 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Speed, D. & Balding, D. J. MultiBLUP: improved SNP-based prediction for complex traits. Genome Res. 24, 1550–1557 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Murray, M. G. & Thompson, W. F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 4321–4325 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bradbury, P. J. et al. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Scheet, P. & Stephens, M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 629–644 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655–1664 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, K. & Muse, S. V. Powermarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21, 2128–2129 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lipka, A. E. et al. GAPIT: Genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics (2012).

  44. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013).

  45. Endelman, J. B. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 4, 250–255 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. de los Campos, G. et al. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 182, 375–385 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Fernando, R. & Garrick, D. GenSel–User Manual for a Portfolio of Genomic Selection Related Analyses (Iowa State Univ., 2008); http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1471-2105-12-186-s1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  48. Piepho, H. P. Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci. 49, 1165–1176 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gianola, D., Fernando, R. L. & Stella, A. Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Genetics 173, 1761–1776 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Habier, D., Fernando, R., Kizilkaya, K. & Garrick, D. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 186 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive grant (2011-03587) from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, by the National Science Foundation grant IOS-1238142, by the Kansas State University Center for Sorghum Improvement, by the Iowa State University Raymond F. Baker Center for Plant Breeding and by the Iowa State University Plant Science Institute. We appreciate K. Mayfield, L. Lambright and S. Staggenborg from Chromatin for conducting experiments at Lubbock, Texas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Iowa State University, Ames, 50011, Iowa, USA

    Xiaoqing Yu, Xianran Li, Tingting Guo, Chengsong Zhu, Patrick S. Schnable & Jianming Yu

  2. Kansas State University, Manhattan, 66506, Kansas, USA

    Yuye Wu, Kraig L. Roozeboom, Donghai Wang & Tesfaye T. Tesso

  3. Cornell University, Ithaca, 14853, New York, USA

    Sharon E. Mitchell

  4. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Griffin, 30223, Georgia, USA

    Ming Li Wang & Gary A. Pederson

  5. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 55108, Minnesota, USA

    Rex Bernardo

Authors
  1. Xiaoqing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xianran Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tingting Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chengsong Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuye Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sharon E. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kraig L. Roozeboom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Donghai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ming Li Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Gary A. Pederson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tesfaye T. Tesso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Patrick S. Schnable
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Rex Bernardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jianming Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.Y., M.L.W., G.A.P., T.T.T., P.S.S. and R.B. conceived and designed the experiments. X.Y., X.L., T.G., C.Z., Y.W., K.L.R., M.L.W. and J.Y. performed the experiments. X.Y., X.L. and C.Z. analysed the data. S.E.M., K.L.R., D.W., M.L.W., G.A.P., T.T.T., P.S.S. and R.B. contributed materials/analysis tools. X.Y., X.L., T.G. and J.Y. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianming Yu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-12 and Supplementary Tables 1-3. (PDF 2298 kb)

Supplementary Data Set

Trait data for the 299-accession training set, the 200-accession validation set, and the 45-accession validation set. (XLSX 50 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, X., Li, X., Guo, T. et al. Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks. Nature Plants 2, 16150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.150

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.150

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing