PRC2 represses dedifferentiation of mature somatic cells in Arabidopsis

  • Nature Plants 1, Article number: 15089 (2015)
  • doi:10.1038/nplants.2015.89
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Plant somatic cells are generally acknowledged to retain totipotency, the potential to develop into any cell type within an organism. This astonishing plasticity may contribute to a high regenerative capacity on severe damage, but how plants control this potential during normal post-embryonic development remains largely unknown1,2. Here we show that POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2 (PRC2), a chromatin regulator that maintains gene repression through histone modification, prevents dedifferentiation of mature somatic cells in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Loss-of-function mutants in PRC2 subunits initially develop unicellular root hairs indistinguishable from those in wild type but fail to retain the differentiated state, ultimately resulting in the generation of an unorganized cell mass and somatic embryos from a single root hair. Strikingly, mutant root hairs complete the normal endoreduplication programme, increasing their nuclear ploidy, but subsequently reinitiate mitotic division coupled with successive DNA replication. Our data show that the WOUND INDUCED DEDIFFERENTIATION3 (WIND3) and LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) genes are among the PRC2 targets involved in this reprogramming, as their ectopic overexpression partly phenocopies the dedifferentiation phenotype of PRC2 mutants. These findings unveil the pivotal role of PRC2-mediated gene repression in preventing unscheduled reprogramming of fully differentiated plant cells.

  • Subscribe to Nature Plants for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    , & Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. Plant Cell 25, 4159–3173 (2013).

  2. 2.

    & Slicing across kingdoms: regeneration in plants and animals. Cell 132, 697–710 (2008).

  3. 3.

    , & Growth and organized development of cultured cells. II. Organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cells. Am. J. Bot. 45, 705–708 (1958).

  4. 4.

    et al. Root hairs: development, growth and evolution at the plant-soil interface. Plant Soil 346, 1–14 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. Interaction of Polycomb-group proteins controlling flowering in Arabidopsis. Development 131, 5263–5276 (2004).

  6. 6.

    et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 controls the embryo-to-seedling phase transition. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002014 (2011).

  7. 7.

    et al. LHP1, the Arabidopsis homologue of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, is required for epigenetic silencing of FLC. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5012–5017 (2006).

  8. 8.

    & Regulation of root hair initiation and expansin gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14, 3237–3253 (2002).

  9. 9.

    et al. Time-lapse analysis of stem-cell divisions in the Arabidopsis thaliana root meristem. Plant J. 48, 619–627 (2006).

  10. 10.

    et al. Nuclear dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 2733–2741 (2000).

  11. 11.

    et al. RHL1 is an essential component of the plant DNA topoisomerase VI complex and is required for ploidy-dependent cell growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18736–18741 (2005).

  12. 12.

    , & Developmental control of endocycles and cell growth in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 654–660 (2010).

  13. 13.

    et al. BIN4, a novel component of the plant DNA topoisomerase VI complex, is required for endoreduplication in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 3655–3668 (2007).

  14. 14.

    et al. GIGAS CELL1, a novel negative regulator of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome, is required for proper mitotic progression and cell fate determination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 4382–4393 (2011).

  15. 15.

    et al. Dynamic regulation of H3K27 trimethylation during Arabidopsis differentiation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002040 (2011).

  16. 16.

    et al. Silencing by plant Polycomb-group genes requires dispersed trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27. EMBO J. 25, 4638–4649 (2006).

  17. 17.

    & Dynamic regulation of Polycomb group activity during plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 523–529 (2012).

  18. 18.

    , , , & The CHD3 chromatin remodeler PICKLE and Polycomb group proteins antagonistically regulate meristem activity in the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 23, 1047–1060 (2011).

  19. 19.

    et al. Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 30, 1928–1938 (2011).

  20. 20.

    et al. The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 21, 508–514 (2011).

  21. 21.

    & A simple method for gene expression and chromatin profiling of individual cell types within a tissue. Dev. Cell 18, 1030–1040 (2010).

  22. 22.

    & LEAFY COTYLEDON2 gene expression and auxin treatment in relation to embryogenic capacity of Arabidopsis somatic cells. Plant Cell Rep. 28, 1677–1688 (2009).

  23. 23.

    et al. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. Plant J. 57, 626–644 (2009).

  24. 24.

    , & Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Dev. Cell 18, 463–471 (2010).

  25. 25.

    , & Regeneration in plants and animals: dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, or just differentiation? Trends Cell Biol. 21, 212–218 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11806–11811 (2001).

  27. 27.

    et al. VAL- and AtBMI1-mediated H2Aub initiate the switch from embryonic to postgerminative growth in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol 23, 1324–1329 (2013).

  28. 28.

    , , & Partially redundant functions of two SET-domain Polycomb-group proteins in controlling initiation of seed development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13244–13249 (2006).

  29. 29.

    et al. Resetting and regulation of Flowering Locus C expression during Arabidopsis reproductive development. Plant J. 57, 918–931 (2009).

  30. 30.

    , & Modular cloning in plant cells. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 103–105 (2005).

  31. 31.

    et al. Development of R4 gateway binary vectors (R4pGWB) enabling high-throughput promoter swapping for plant research. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72, 624–629 (2008).

  32. 32.

    et al. Transcriptional repression of the APC/C activator CCS52A1 promotes active termination of cell growth. EMBO J. 31, 4488–4501 (2012).

  33. 33.

    & Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).

  34. 34.

    et al. SUMO E3 ligase HIGH PLOIDY2 regulates endocycle onset and meristem maintenance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2284–2297 (2009).

  35. 35.

    , & The boundary of the meristematic and elongation zones in roots: endoreduplication precedes rapid cell expansion. Sci. Rep. 3, 2723 (2013).

  36. 36.

    et al. MeDIP-HMM: genome-wide identification of distinct DNA methylation states from high-density tiling arrays. Bioinformatics 28, 2930–2939 (2012).

  37. 37.

    et al. Nuclear retention of the transcription factor NLP7 orchestrates the early response to nitrate in plants. Nature Commun. 4, 1713 (2013).

  38. 38.

    & A systems approach reveals regulatory circuitry for Arabidopsis trichome initiation by the GL3 and GL1 selectors. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000396 (2009).

Download references


This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (22119010) and a grant from Scientific Technique Research Promotion Program for Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Industry to K.S. M.I. is supported by the RIKEN Special Postdoctoral Researcher Programme. Epigenomic studies were supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme Network of Excellence EpiGeneSys and the CNRS to the group of V. Colot (A.K.M. and F.R.). A.K.M. is the recipient of a grant from the French Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur. PRC2 expression studies were supported by a France-Berkeley grant to F.R. and S.M.B., an EMBO LT and Human Frontiers Science Program Postdoctoral Fellowship to M.dL. and a Hellman Junior Faculty Fellowship to S.M.B.

Author information

Author notes

    • Momoko Ikeuchi
    •  & Akira Iwase

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. RIKEN Centre for Sustainable Resource Science, 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan

    • Momoko Ikeuchi
    • , Akira Iwase
    • , Bart Rymen
    • , Hirofumi Harashima
    • , Michitaro Shibata
    • , Mariko Ohnuma
    • , Christian Breuer
    •  & Keiko Sugimoto
  2. Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS UMR8197, INSERM U1024, 46 rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 05 75230, France

    • Ana Karina Morao
    •  & François Roudier
  3. Department of Plant Biology and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, 1002 Life Sciences, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA

    • Miguel de Lucas
    •  & Siobhan M. Brady
  4. Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, Gent B-9052, Belgium

    • Lieven De Veylder
  5. Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Gent B-9052, Belgium

    • Lieven De Veylder
  6. Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK

    • Justin Goodrich


  1. Search for Momoko Ikeuchi in:

  2. Search for Akira Iwase in:

  3. Search for Bart Rymen in:

  4. Search for Hirofumi Harashima in:

  5. Search for Michitaro Shibata in:

  6. Search for Mariko Ohnuma in:

  7. Search for Christian Breuer in:

  8. Search for Ana Karina Morao in:

  9. Search for Miguel de Lucas in:

  10. Search for Lieven De Veylder in:

  11. Search for Justin Goodrich in:

  12. Search for Siobhan M. Brady in:

  13. Search for François Roudier in:

  14. Search for Keiko Sugimoto in:


A.I. and K.S. conceived the project. M.I., A.I. and K.S. designed the experiments, and M.I., A.I. and M.O. conducted most of genetic and cell biological analyses except ChIP-chip, which was performed by F.R., A.K.M. and J.G., and ploidy analyses, which was performed by L.D.V., H.H., B.R. and M.S. C.B. generated pEXP7:NLS–GFP and pEXP7:GTL1–GFP plants, and M.dL. and S.M.B. generated pEMF2:EMF2–GFP plants. M.I. and K.S. wrote the manuscript with help from the co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiko Sugimoto.

Supplementary information