Article | Published:

Experimental onset threshold and magnetic pressure pile-up for 3D reconnection

Nature Physics 5, 521–526 (2009) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Magnetic reconnection changes the topology of magnetic field lines to a lower-energy state. This process can liberate stored magnetic field energy and accelerate particles during unsteady, explosive events. This is one of the most important processes in astrophysical, space and laboratory plasmas. The abrupt onset and cessation has been a long-standing puzzle. We show the first three-dimensional (3D) laboratory example of the onset and stagnation of magnetic reconnection between magnetized and parallel current channels (flux ropes) driven by magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) attraction and a 3D plasma-current-driven instability. Antiparallel magnetic field lines carried by these colliding flux ropes annihilate and drive an electric field. The inflow soon exceeds a threshold for the formation of a reconnection current layer. Magnetic flux and pressure pile up just outside this layer, and eventually become large enough to support MHD back-reaction forces that stall the inflow and stagnate the reconnection process.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  2. 2.

    & Magnetic Reconnection (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  3. 3.

    , & The complex structure of the reconnecting magnetopause. Phys. Plasmas 10, 2480–2485 (2003).

  4. 4.

    Plasma Physics for Astrophysics (Princeton Univ. Press, 2005).

  5. 5.

    Relaxation and magnetic reconnection in plasmas. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 741–763 (1986).

  6. 6.

    Review of controlled laboratory experiments on physics of magnetic reconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 14529–14541 (1999).

  7. 7.

    Sweet’s mechanism for merging magnetic fields in conducting fluids. J. Geophys. Res. 62, 509–520 (1957).

  8. 8.

    The Neutral Point Theory of Solar Flares (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1958).

  9. 9.

    et al. In situ evidence for the structure of a magnetic null in a 3D reconnection event in the Earth’s magnetotail. Nature Phys. 2, 478–483 (2006).

  10. 10.

    & Experimental observations of the tearing of an electron current sheet. Phys. Fluids 31, 2017–2025 (1988).

  11. 11.

    Dynamics of magnetic flux tubes in space and laboratory plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 13, 058301 (2006).

  12. 12.

    et al. Current-driven rotating-kink mode in a plasma column with a non-line-tied free end. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 015002–015004 (2006).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Transition of MHD kink stability properties between line-tied and non line tied boundary conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 205004 (2008).

  14. 14.

    , , & The frontside boundary layer of the magnetosphere and the problem of reconnection. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 3195–3216 (1978).

  15. 15.

    Global problems in magnetospheric plasma physics and prospects for their solution. Space Sci. Rev. 21, 23–71 (1977).

  16. 16.

    et al. A magnetic reconnection X-line extending more than 309 Earth radii in the solar wind. Nature 439, 175–178 (2006).

  17. 17.

    et al. Laboratory observations of spontaneous magnetic reconnection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 015003 (2007).

  18. 18.

    Plasma instability at an X-type magnetic neutral point. Phys. Fluids 16, 1501–1504 (1973).

  19. 19.

    Magnetic reconnection and current sheet formation in 3D magnetic configurations. Plasma Phys. Control Fusion 41, A687–A697 (1999).

  20. 20.

    & Micro–macro coupling in plasma self-organization processes during island coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100035004 (2008).

  21. 21.

    & Coalescence of magnetic islands. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1069–1071 (1980).

  22. 22.

    & Coalescence of magnetic islands in the low-resistivity, Hall-MHD regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 135001–135004 (2006).

  23. 23.

    et al. Reconnection scaling experiment: A new device for three-dimensional magnetic reconnection studies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 2324–2331 (2003).

  24. 24.

    et al. Long lifetime current driven rotating kink modes in a non line-tied plasma column with a free end. J. Geophys. Res. 112, A05S90 (2007).

  25. 25.

    , & Fast camera images of flux ropes during plasma relaxation. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 33, 448–449 (2005).

  26. 26.

    , , , & A three dimensional probe positioner. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 10F129 (2008).

  27. 27.

    , , , & Phenomenological theory of the kink instability in a slender plasma column. Phys. Plasmas 13, 032105 (2006).

  28. 28.

    , , & Kink instability of flux ropes anchored at one end and free at the other. J. Geophys. Res. 111, A12S06 (2006).

  29. 29.

    et al. New insights into dissipation in the electron layer during magnetic reconnection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L13106 (2008).

  30. 30.

    & Reconnection of Magnetic Fields (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  31. 31.

    , & The role of electron heat flux in guide-field magnetic reconnection. Phys. Plasmas 11, 5387–5397 (2004).

  32. 32.

    & Time dependent magnetic annhilation at a stagnation point. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 19395–19407 (1993).

  33. 33.

    & Whistler mediated magnetic reconnection in large systems: Magnetic flux pileup and the formation of thin current sheets. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 1133 (2003).

  34. 34.

    & Magnetic merging in colliding flux tubes. Astrophys. J. 440, 407–414 (1995).

  35. 35.

    , & Semi analytical model for flux pileup limited, dynamically reconnecting systems in resistive magnetohydrodynamics. Phys. Plasmas 13, 082103 (2006).

  36. 36.

    FLIP MHD: A particle-in-cell method for magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 96, 163–192 (1991).

  37. 37.

    , , & Quasi separatrix layers in a reduced magnetohydrodynamic model of a coronal loop. Astrophys. J. 521, 889–897 (1999).

  38. 38.

    , , & Role of dispersive waves in collisionless magnetic reconnection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 195004 (2001).

  39. 39.

    , & An analytic study of the perpendicularly propagating electromagnetic drift instabilities in the magnetic reconnection experiment. Phys. Plasmas 15, 122105 (2008).

  40. 40.

    , , , & THEMIS observations of modified Hall fields in asymmetric magnetic field reconnection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L17S04 (2008).

  41. 41.

    & Surface and discrete Alfvén waves in a current carrying plasma. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 26, 1285–1298 (1984).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Los Alamos Laboratory Directed Research and Development program under LANS Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396, and the Physics Frontier Center for Magnetic Self Organization in Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas, jointly funded by the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy. We appreciate insightful comments from S. C. Hsu.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory, P-24 Plasma Physics, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

    • T. P. Intrator
    • , X. Sun
    •  & L. Dorf

  2. Centre for Plasma Astrophysics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, BE-3001, Belgium

    • G. Lapenta

  3. CRPP-EPFL, Bâtiment PPB, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

    • I. Furno

Authors

  1. Search for T. P. Intrator in:

  2. Search for X. Sun in:

  3. Search for G. Lapenta in:

  4. Search for L. Dorf in:

  5. Search for I. Furno in:

Contributions

T.P.I. realized that our data showed 3D-instability-driven reconnection onset and stagnation and wrote this article, X.S. acquired most of the data and did substantial data analyses, G.L. carried out computational simulations of the RSX experiment, I.F. and L.D built much of the RSX experiment and discussed the results with T.P.I. and X.S. and solidified the arguments and presentation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. P. Intrator.

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1300