Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Collective helicity switching of a DNA–coat assembly

This article has been updated

Abstract

Hierarchical assemblies of biomolecular subunits can carry out versatile tasks at the cellular level with remarkable spatial and temporal precision1,2. As an example, the collective motion and mutual cooperation between complex protein machines mediate essential functions for life, such as replication3, synthesis4, degradation5, repair6 and transport7. Nucleic acid molecules are far less dynamic than proteins and need to bind to specific proteins to form hierarchical structures. The simplest example of these nucleic acid-based structures is provided by a rod-shaped tobacco mosaic virus, which consists of genetic material surrounded by coat proteins8. Inspired by the complexity and hierarchical assembly of viruses, a great deal of effort has been devoted to design similarly constructed artificial viruses9,10. However, such a wrapping approach makes nucleic acid dynamics insensitive to environmental changes. This limitation generally restricts, for example, the amplification of the conformational dynamics between the right-handed B form to the left-handed Z form of double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)11,12. Here we report a virus-like hierarchical assembly in which the native DNA and a synthetic coat undergo repeated collective helicity switching triggered by pH change under physiological conditions. We also show that this collective helicity inversion occurs during translocation of the DNA–coat assembly into intracellular compartments. Translating DNA conformational dynamics into a higher level of hierarchical dynamics may provide an approach to create DNA-based nanomachines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Self-assembly of coat molecules driven by DNA and collective helicity switching of the DNA–coat assembly.
Figure 2: Dimension and packing arrangement of the helical DNA–coat assembly at pH 7.4.
Figure 3: Collective helicity switching triggered by a pH change.
Figure 4: Collective helicity inversion driven by translocation from the extracellular matrix to intracellular compartments.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 11 April 2017

    In the version of this Letter originally published, Fig. 1 contained chemical structures that were not drawn in our house stlye. These structures have been replaced in all versions of the Letter.

References

  1. Kinbara, K. & Aida, T. Toward intelligent molecular machines: directed motions of biological and artificial molecules and assemblies. Chem. Rev. 105, 1377–1400 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishii, D. et al. Chaperonin-mediated stabilization and ATP-triggered release of semiconductor nanoparticles. Nature 423, 628–632 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun, J. et al. Cdc6-induced conformational changes in ORC bound to origin DNA revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. Structure 20, 534–544 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alberts, B. et al. The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell 92, 291–294 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olivares, A. O. et al. Mechanochemical basis of protein degradation by a double-ring A+A+A+ machine. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 871–875 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saibil, H. et al. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 630–642 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan, K. J. et al. The nuclear pore complex: a protein machine bridging the nucleus and cytoplasm. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 361–371 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler, P. J. G. et al. Self-assembly of tobacco mosaic virus: the role of an intermediate aggregate in generating both specificity and speed. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 354, 537–550 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim, Y.-B. et al. Filamentous artificial virus from a self-assembled discrete nanoribbon. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 4525–4528 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernandez-Garcia, A. et al. Design and self-assembly of simple coat proteins for artificial viruses. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 698–702 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuertes, M. A. et al. Molecular mechanisms for the B-Z transition in the example of poly[d(G-C).d((G-C)) polymers. A critical review. Chem. Rev. 106, 2045–2064 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, J. et al. Conformational changes of non-B DNA. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 5893–5909 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, H.-J. et al. Self-dissociating tubules from helical stacking of noncovalent macrocycles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 139, 8471–8475 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, Z . et al. Pulsating tubules from noncovalent macrocycles. Science 337, 1521–1526, (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kypr, J . et al. Circular dichroism and conformational polymorphism of DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 37, 1713–1725 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Benevides, J. M. et al. Characterization of DNA structures by Raman spectroscopy: high-salt and low-salt forms of double helical poly(dG-dC) in H2O and D2O solutions and application to B, Z and A-DNA. Nucl. Acids Res. 11, 5747–5761 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Misra, V. K. et al. The electrostatic contribution to the B-to-Z transition of DNA. Biochemistry 35, 1115–1124 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugiyama, H. et al. Synthesis, structure and thermodynamic properties of 8-methylguanine-containing oligonucleotides: Z-DNA under physiological salt conditions. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 1272–1278 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barone, G . et al. Confinement effects on the interaction of native DNA with Cu(II)-5-(triethylammoniunethyl) salicylidene ortho-pheylendiiminate in C12E4 liquid crystals. Dalton Trans. 4172–4178 (2008).

  20. Callahan, L. et al. B- to Z-DNA transition probed by oligonucleotides containing methylphosphonates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1617–1621 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zacharias, W . et al. Conditions which cause the right-handed to left-handed DNA conformational transitions. J. Biol. Chem. 257, 2775–2782 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Sayed, A. & Harashima, H. Endocytosis of gene delivery vectors: from clathrin-dependent to lipid raft-mediated endocytosis. Mol. Ther. 21, 1118–1130 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Geisow, M. J. & Evans, W. H. pH in the endosome. Measurements during pinocytosis and receptor-mediated endocytosis. Exp. Cell Res. 150, 36–46 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kunitz, M. Crystalline desoxyribonuclease; isolation and general properties; spectrophotometric method for the measurement of desoxyribonuclease activity. J. Gen. Physiol. 33, 349–362 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Herbert, A. & Rich, A. Left-handed Z-DNA: structure and function. Genetica 106, 37–47 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, Y. et al. Open–closed switching of synthetic tubular pores. Nat. Commun. 6, 8650 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gift, A. D., Stewart, S. M. & Bokashanga, P. K. Experimental determination of pKa values by use of NMR chemical shifts, revisited. J. Chem. Educ. 89, 1458–1460 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Beniash, E. et al. Self-assembling peptide amphiphile nanofiber matrices for cell entrapment. Acta Biomater. 1, 387–397 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the 1000 Program, and the National Natural Science Foundation China (no. 51473062, no. 21574055, no. 21634005 and no. 21550110493).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.K. designed and performed most of the experiments, H.L. synthesized molecules and carried out AFM experiments, Y.H. performed TEM experiments, X.C. carried out ITC experiments, X.M. performed cell cultures and imaging experiments and M.L. developed the concept, supervised the research and wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myongsoo Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 15825 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Li, H., He, Y. et al. Collective helicity switching of a DNA–coat assembly. Nature Nanotech 12, 551–556 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.42

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.42

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing