Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Self-formation of sub-60-nm half-pitch gratings with large areas through fracturing

Abstract

Periodic micro- and nanostructures (gratings) have many significant applications in electronic, optical, magnetic, chemical and biological devices and materials. Traditional methods for fabricating gratings by writing with electrons1, ions2 or a mechanical tip are limited to very small areas and suffer from extremely low throughput. Interference lithography can achieve relatively large fabrication areas, but has a low yield for small-period gratings3,4. Photolithography5, nanoimprint lithography6,7, soft lithography8,9 and lithographically induced self-construction10 all require a prefabricated mask, and although electrohydrodynamic instabilities11 can self-produce periodic dots without a mask, gratings remain challenging. Here, we report a new low-cost maskless method to self-generate nano- and microgratings from an initially featureless polymer thin film sandwiched between two relatively rigid flat plates. By simply prising apart the plates, the film fractures into two complementary sets of nonsymmetrical gratings, one on each plate, of the same period. The grating period is always four times the thickness of the glassy film, regardless of its molecular weight and chemical composition. Periods from 120 nm to 200 µm have been demonstrated across areas as large as two square centimetres.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Schematic of the FIS process.
Figure 2: Images of FIS gratings.
Figure 3: Grating period p as a function of film thickness h.
Figure 4: Grating period as a function of separation temperature.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tennant, D. M. et al. Characterization of near-field holography grating masks for optoelectronics fabricated by electron-beam lithography. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10, 2530–2535 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Melngailis, J., Mondelli, A. A., Berry, I. L. & Mohondro, R. A review of ion projection lithography. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16, 927–957 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yen, A., Anderson, E. H., Ghanbari, R. A., Schattenburg, M. L. & Smith, H. I. Achromatic holographic configuration for 100 nm-period lithography. Appl. Opt. 31, 4540–4545 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Solak, H. H. et al. Exposure of 38 nm period grating patterns with extreme ultraviolet interferometric lithography. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2328–2330 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill, K. O., Malo, B., Bilodeau, F., Johnson, D. C. & Albert, J. Bragg gratings fabricated in monomode photosensitive optical fiber by UV exposure through a phase mask. Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1035–1037 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chou, S. Y., Krauss, P. R. & Renstrom, P. J. Imprint lithography with 25-nanometer resolution. Science 272, 85–87 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey, T. et al. Step and flash imprint lithography: Template surface treatment and defect analysis. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 3572–3577 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar, A. & Whitesides, G. M. Features of gold having micrometer to centimeter dimensions can be formed through a combination of stamping with an elastomeric stamp and an alkanethiol ink followed by chemical etching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2002–2004 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffy, D. C., McDonald, J. C., Schueller, O. J. A. & Whitesides, G. M. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70, 4974–4984 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou, S. Y., Zhuang, L. & Guo, L. J. Lithographically induced self-construction of polymer microstructures for resistless patterning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1004–1006 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chou, S. Y. & Zhuang, L. Lithographically induced self-assembly of periodic polymer micropillar arrays. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 3197–3202 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deshpande, P. Nanolithography in thin polymer films using guided self-assembly. PhD Dissertation, Princeton University (2005).

  13. Pease, L. F. III. Pattern formation in polymer via electrohydrodynamic instabilities and glassy fracture. PhD Dissertation, Princeton University (2005).

  14. Bjerke, T., Li, Z. H. & Lambros, J. Role of plasticity in heat generation during high rate deformation and fracture of polycarbonate. Int. J. Plasticity 18, 549–567 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Benkoski, J. J., Fredrickson, G. H. & Kramer, E. J. Model for the fracture energy of glassy polymer–polymer interfaces. J. Polym. Sci. 40, 2377–2386 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chai, H. A note on crack trajectory in an elastic strip bounded by rigid substrates. Int. J. Fracture 32, 211–213 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cotterell, B. & Rice, J. B. Slightly curved or kinked cracks. Int. J. Fracture 16, 155–169 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sumi, Y., Nemat-Nasser, S. & Keer, L. M. On crack path stability in a finite body. Eng. Fracture Mech. 22, 759–771 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, J. S. & Suo, Z. Experimental determination of interfacial toughness curves using brazil-nut-sandwiches. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 1279–1290 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, J. et al. Fracture behavior of an epoxy/aluminum interface reinforced by sol–gel coatings. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 20, 277–305 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Freund, L. B. Dynamic Fracture Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Materials Research Science & Engineering Centers (MRSEC) (NSF-DMR-0213706), the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Department of Defense (NDSEG) through a fellowship to L.F.P. The authors thank Wen-di Li for preparation of certain graphs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.D., L.F.P. and Y.W. performed the experiments. L.F.P., P.D., Y.W., W.B.R. and S.Y.C. designed and discussed the experiments, analysed the data and co-wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to William B. Russel or Stephen Y. Chou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pease, L., Deshpande, P., Wang, Y. et al. Self-formation of sub-60-nm half-pitch gratings with large areas through fracturing. Nature Nanotech 2, 545–548 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.264

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.264

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing