Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses

Abstract

Trial-to-trial variability in the blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) response of functional magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to be relevant to human perception and behavior, but the sources of this variability remain unknown. We demonstrate that coherent spontaneous fluctuations in human brain activity account for a significant fraction of the variability in measured event-related BOLD responses and that spontaneous and task-related activity are linearly superimposed in the human brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Identification of regions of interest in the LMC and RMC for a single subject (subject 1).
Figure 2: Coherent spontaneous fluctuations account for a significant fraction of the variance in measured event-related responses.
Figure 3: Coherent spontaneous fluctuations and task-related responses are linearly superimposed.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ress, D. & Heeger, D.J. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 414–420 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pessoa, L. & Padmala, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5612–5617 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagner, A.D. et al. Science 281, 1188–1191 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pessoa, L., Gutierrez, E., Bandettini, P.A. & Ungerleider, L.G. Neuron 35, 975–987 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arieli, A., Sterkin, A., Grinvald, A. & Aertsent, A. Science 273, 1868–1871 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiser, J., Chiu, C. & Weliky, M. Nature 431, 573–578 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Azouz, R. & Gray, C.M. J. Neurosci. 19, 2209–2223 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswal, B., Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. & Hyde, J. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, M.D. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9673–9678 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cordes, D. et al. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21, 1636–1644 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe, M.J., Mock, B.J. & Sorenson, J.A. Neuroimage 7, 119–132 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hampson, M., Peterson, B.S., Skudlarski, P., Gatenby, J.C. & Gore, J.C. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 247–262 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zacks, J.M. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 651–655 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shatz, C.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 602–608 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olshausen, B.A. in The Visual Neurosciences (eds. Chalupa, L.M. & Werner, J.S.) 1603–1615 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health grant NS06833.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D Fox.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Reproduction of figure 2 from the article for each of the 14 subjects. (PDF 2423 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Regional statistics for each subject (PDF 60 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Changes in signal power, noise power, and signal/noise ratio for LMC event-related responses upon removal of RMC activity for each subject (PDF 52 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Response magnitudes binned by activity in the right somatomotor cortex. (PDF 56 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 122 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, M., Snyder, A., Zacks, J. et al. Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nat Neurosci 9, 23–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1616

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1616

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing