Abstract
A prominent model of how the brain regulates attention proposes that the anterior cingulate cortex monitors the occurrence of conflict between incompatible response tendencies and signals this information to a cognitive control system in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive control is thought to resolve conflict through the attentional biasing of perceptual processing, emphasizing task-relevant stimulus information. It is not known, however, whether conflict resolution is mediated by amplifying neural representations of task-relevant information, inhibiting representations of task-irrelevant information, or both. Here we manipulated trial-by-trial levels of conflict and control during a Stroop task using face stimuli, while recording hemodynamic responses from human visual cortex specialized for face processing. We show that, in response to high conflict, cognitive control mechanisms enhance performance by transiently amplifying cortical responses to task-relevant information rather than by inhibiting responses to task-irrelevant information. These results implicate attentional target-feature amplification as the primary mechanism for conflict resolution through cognitive control.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).
Miller, E.K. & Cohen, J.D. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001).
Logan, G.D. & Zbrodoff, N.J. When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Mem. Cognit. 7, 166–174 (1979).
Gratton, G., Coles, M.G. & Donchin, E. Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 121, 480–506 (1992).
Stroop, J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643–662 (1935).
MacLeod, C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 109, 163–203 (1991).
Kerns, J.G. et al. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 303, 1023–1026 (2004).
Egner, T. & Hirsch, J. The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. Neuroimage 24, 539–547 (2005).
Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Carter, C.S. & Cohen, J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652 (2001).
Carter, C.S. et al. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280, 747–749 (1998).
Carter, C.S. et al. Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1944–1948 (2000).
Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L.E., Fissell, K., Carter, C.S. & Cohen, J.D. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 402, 179–181 (1999).
MacDonald, A.W., III, Cohen, J.D., Stenger, V.A. & Carter, C.S. Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288, 1835–1838 (2000).
Durston, S. et al. Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 20, 2135–2141 (2003).
Casey, B.J. et al. Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8728–8733 (2000).
Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K. & McClelland, J.L. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychol. Rev. 97, 332–361 (1990).
Kastner, S. & Ungerleider, L.G. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 315–341 (2000).
Heinze, H.J. et al. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 372, 543–546 (1994).
Luck, S.J., Chelazzi, L., Hillyard, S.A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 24–42 (1997).
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F.M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G.L. & Petersen, S.E. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J. Neurosci. 11, 2383–2402 (1991).
Treue, S. & Maunsell, J.H. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature 382, 539–541 (1996).
Chawla, D., Rees, G. & Friston, K.J. The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 671–676 (1999).
O'Craven, K.M., Downing, P.E. & Kanwisher, N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401, 584–587 (1999).
Serences, J.T., Schwarzbach, J., Courtney, S.M., Golay, X. & Yantis, S. Control of object-based attention in human cortex. Cereb. Cortex 14, 1346–1357 (2004).
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J. & Chun, M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17, 4302–4311 (1997).
Wylie, G.R., Javitt, D.C. & Foxe, J.J. Don't think of a white bear: an fMRI investigation of the effects of sequential instructional sets on cortical activity in a task-switching paradigm. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 279–297 (2004).
O'Craven, K.M. & Kanwisher, N. Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 1013–1023 (2000).
Cox, D., Meyers, E. & Sinha, P. Contextually evoked object-specific responses in human visual cortex. Science 304, 115–117 (2004).
Summerfield, C., Egner, T., Mangels, J. & Hirsch, J. Mistaking a house for a face: neural correlates of misperception in healthy humans. Cereb. Cortex, published online 13 July 2005 (10.1093/cercor/bhi129).
Epstein, R. & Kanwisher, N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601 (1998).
Friston, K.J. et al. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6, 218–229 (1997).
Friston, K.J. Functional integration in the brain. in Human Brain Function 2nd edn. (eds. Frackowiak, R.S. et al.) 971–997 (Academic Press, San Diego, 2004).
Mayr, U., Awh, E. & Laurey, P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 450–452 (2003).
Botvinick, M.M., Cohen, J.D. & Carter, C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 539–546 (2004).
Nieuwenhuis, S. et al. Accounting for sequential effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Mem. Cognit. (in the press).
Eriksen, B.A. & Eriksen, C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 143–149 (1974).
Kastner, S., Pinsk, M.A., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R. & Ungerleider, L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 22, 751–761 (1999).
Egner, T. & Hirsch, J. Where memory meets attention: neural substrates of negative priming. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1774–1784 (2005).
Lavie, N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 451–468 (1995).
Rees, G., Frith, C.D. & Lavie, N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278, 1616–1619 (1997).
Hommel, B., Proctor, R.W. & Vu, K.P. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychol. Res. 68, 1–17 (2004).
Sturmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroter, H. & Sommer, W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 1345–1363 (2002).
Cho, R.Y. et al. Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 283–299 (2002).
Jones, A.D., Cho, R.Y., Nystrom, L.E., Cohen, J.D. & Braver, T.S. A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 300–317 (2002).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Etkin, C. Summerfield, E. Stern, J. Grinband and J. Mangels for comments. This work was funded in part by Johnson & Johnson (J.H).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egner, T., Hirsch, J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat Neurosci 8, 1784–1790 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1594
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1594
This article is cited by
-
The role of attitudes towards contradiction in psychological resilience: the cortical mechanism of conflicting resolution networks
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Similarities of SNARC, cognitive Simon, and visuomotor Simon effects in terms of response time distributions, hand-stimulus proximity, and temporal dynamics
Psychological Research (2024)
-
Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching
Nature Reviews Psychology (2023)
-
Modulation of the executive control network by anodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves task shielding in dual tasking
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
White matter disconnection of left multiple demand network is associated with post-lesion deficits in cognitive control
Nature Communications (2023)