Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea

Nature Neuroscience volume 7, pages 333–334 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

It is commonly believed that the cochlea emits sounds through backward-traveling waves. In the present experiment using a scanning-laser interferometer, I detected forward-traveling but not backward-traveling waves and found that the stapes vibrates earlier than the basilar membrane. These results contradict the current theory and show that the ear emits sounds through the cochlear fluids as compression waves rather than along the basilar membrane as backward-traveling waves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Magnitudes (shown in logarithmic scale) and phases of basilar membrane vibration at f1, f2 and 2f1 – f2 frequencies.
Figure 2: Frequency responses of the basilar membrane, stapes and ear-canal sound pressure to constant f2 (17 kHz) and frequency-varied f1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kemp, D.T. Hear. Res. 22, 95–104 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2027–2067 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shera, C.A. & Guinan, J.J. Jr. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 782–798 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Knight, R.D. & Kemp, D.T. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1513–1525 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Robles, L., Ruggero, M.A. & Rich, N.C. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 2385–2399 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ren, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 17101–17106 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, N.P. & Rhode, W.S. J. Neurophysiol. 78, 261–270 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rhode, W.S. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 (Suppl. 2), 1218–1231 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khanna, S.M. & Leonard, D.G. Science 215, 305–306 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Russell, I.J. & Nilsen, K.E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2660–2664 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Narayan, S.S., Temchin, A.N., Recio, A. & Ruggero, M.A. Science 282, 1882–1884 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olson, E.S. Nature 402, 526–529 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. von Békésy, G. Experiments in Hearing (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zwislocki, J.J. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 986–989 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank A.L. Nuttall, P. Gillespie and K. Grosh for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript, E.V. Porsov for writing software, and S. Matthews for technical help. Supported by the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), and the National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), Portland Veteran's Administration Medical Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Hearing Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, NRC 04, Portland, 97239-3098, Oregon, USA

    Tianying Ren

Authors
  1. Tianying Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianying Ren.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Diagram of the widely accepted theory of the propagation of the cubic distortion product otoacoustic emission in the cochlea3,4,5. (a) Waveforms and envelopes of basilar membrane (BM) vibration at f1, f2, and 2f1 - f2; (b) corresponding phase curves. The acoustic energy at distortion product (DP) frequency of 2f1-f1 is generated near "DP origin" and propagates in both directions along the BM. The backward traveling wave vibrates the stapes and appears as the emissions in the ear canal. The forward-traveling wave is partially reflected near DP characteristic frequency place (DP CF) and forms a second backward traveling wave. The phase of the backward traveling waves shows a positive relationship with the distance from the base. (JPG 45 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2.

Cochlear fluids-based mechanisms for the transmission of the otoacoustic emission in the cochlea. (a) Waveforms and envelopes of BM vibration at f1, f2, and 2f1 - f2; (b) corresponding phase curves. The acoustic energy generated near "DP origin" propagates through the cochlear fluids to the whole cochlea at the speed of sound in water. It vibrates the stapes, resulting in emissions in the ear canal, and launches a forward traveling wave at 2f1 - f2. Thus, in panel b, the backward propagation of the emission shows no significant phase delay. (JPG 44 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 8 kb)

Supplementary Note (PDF 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ren, T. Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea. Nat Neurosci 7, 333–334 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1216

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1216

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing