Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies

Nature Neuroscience volume 18, pages 1574–1576 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Inflexible behavior is a core characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but its underlying cause is unknown. Using a perceptual learning protocol, we observed initially efficient learning in ASD that was followed by anomalously poor learning when the location of the target was changed (over-specificity). Reducing stimulus repetition eliminated over-specificity. Our results indicate that inflexible behavior may be evident ubiquitously in ASD, even in sensory learning, but can be circumvented by specifically designed stimulation protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The texture discrimination task.
Figure 2: Over-specificity in ASD visual learning and its elimination following the dummy training.
Figure 3: RT analysis.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sumiyoshi, C. et al. Neurosci. Res. 69, 252–257 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson, M., Mottron, L. & Gernsbacher, M.A. in Learning and Memory: a Comprehensive Reference (eds. Byrne, J. & Roediger, H.L.I.) 759–772 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2008).

  3. Sagi, D. Vision Res. 51, 1552–1566 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, H., Gliksberg, M. & Sagi, D. Curr. Biol. 22, 1813–1817 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Karni, A. & Sagi, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 4966–4970 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahissar, M. & Hochstein, S. Nature 387, 401–406 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenlee, M.W. & Magnussen, S. Vision Res. 28, 1303–1310 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, J., Aczel, B., Jiménez, L., Kaufman, S.B. & Grant, K.P. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 63, 1789–1812 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roser, M.E., Aslin, R.N., McKenzie, R., Zahra, D. & Fiser, J. Neuropsychology 29, 163–172 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Petrov, A.A., Van Horn, N.M. & Ratcliff, R. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 490–497 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, C.C. & Watanabe, T. Vision Res. 61, 107–114 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian, N. & Lipkin, R.M.A. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 77 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Webster, M.A. J. Vis. 11, 3 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris, H. & Sagi, D. Vision Res. 109, 77–86 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lord, C. et al. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 205–223 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lord, C. et al. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 24, 659–685 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Egan, A. Gupta and J. Geskin for their assistance in data collection, and D. Plaut and R. Malach for fruitful comments and discussions. This work was supported by grants from the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation and the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative. H.H. thanks the Azrieli Foundation for the award of an Azrieli Fellowship.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Marlene Behrmann and Dov Sagi: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurobiology/Brain Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

    Hila Harris, Yoram Bonneh & Dov Sagi

  2. Jerusalem Center for Mental Health, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

    David Israeli

  3. Center for Excellence in Autism Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Nancy Minshew

  4. Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Yoram Bonneh

  5. Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York, USA

    David J Heeger

  6. Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Marlene Behrmann

Authors
  1. Hila Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Israeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nancy Minshew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoram Bonneh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David J Heeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marlene Behrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dov Sagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H., M.B. and D.S. designed the experiments. D.I., N.M. and Y.B. handled the clinical aspects. H.H. and M.B. collected the data. H.H., M.B. and D.S. analyzed the data. H.H., D.J.H., M.B. and D.S. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dov Sagi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Over-specificity with shorter stimulus durations.

Same format as Fig. 2a. Black curve: a group of ASD observers (n = 3) were trained with the standard training protocol, but with shorter stimulus presentation time of 10 ms (instead of 40 ms, used in Fig. 2). Gray curve: data from a group of non-matched control observers (see Methods, n = 24). Learning at location 1 of the ASD group matches the learning of the typical group. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA uncovered a significant effect of day (F(4,8) = 5.04, p = 0.02). Subsequent two-tailed pairwise comparison found significant learning following training (from day 1 to day 4, p = 0.015). Numerically, the initial performance level at the new location (day 5; 133 ± 16 ms) was worse than the trained performance level (day 4; 91 ± 18 ms), implying specificity of learning. However, the difference was not significant (p = 0.1). Also, the initial performance at the new location (day 5) was not significantly different from the initial performance level (day 1, p = 0.09), supporting specificity of learning. Typically, there are no performance relapses at location 2 (days 5-8, ‘standard’ group), but the ASD group showed a drop in performance on day 7 (125 ±11 ms) relative to day 6 (93 ± 4 ms), which was followed by a significant improvement on day 8 (p = 0.03). Notably, while in Fig. 2 there is ~30ms difference between the ASD and control groups’ initial performance level, here the initial thresholds of the ASD and non-ASD groups are closer. This implies that the stronger target duration time applied in Fig. 2 increased the difference between ASD and controls and may be explained by an increased sensitivity of the ASD observers to stimulus intensity.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, H., Israeli, D., Minshew, N. et al. Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies. Nat Neurosci 18, 1574–1576 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4129

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4129

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing