Letter

A Wolbachia deubiquitylating enzyme induces cytoplasmic incompatibility

  • Nature Microbiology 2, Article number: 17007 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.7
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Wolbachia are obligate intracellular bacteria1 that infect arthropods, including approximately two-thirds of insect species2. Wolbachia manipulate insect reproduction by enhancing their inheritance through the female germline. The most common alteration is cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI)3,​4,​5, where eggs from uninfected females fail to develop when fertilized by sperm from Wolbachia-infected males. By contrast, if female and male partners are both infected, embryos are viable. CI is a gene-drive mechanism impacting population structure6 and causing reproductive isolation7, but its molecular mechanism has remained unknown. We show that a Wolbachia deubiquitylating enzyme (DUB) induces CI. The CI-inducing DUB, CidB, cleaves ubiquitin from substrates and is encoded in a two-gene operon, and the other protein, CidA, binds CidB. Binding is strongest between cognate partners in cidA-cidB homologues. In transgenic Drosophila, the cidA-cidB operon mimics CI when sperm introduce it into eggs, and a catalytically inactive DUB does not induce sterility. Toxicity is recapitulated in yeast by CidB alone; this requires DUB activity but is rescued by coexpressed CidA. A paralogous operon involves a putative nuclease (CinB) rather than a DUB. Analogous binding, toxicity and rescue in yeast were observed. These results identify a CI mechanism involving interacting proteins that are secreted into germline cells by Wolbachia, and suggest new methods for insect control.

  • Subscribe to Nature Microbiology for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

  • Purchase article full text and PDF:

    $32

    Buy now

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    & Studies on Rickettsia-like micro-organisms in insects. J. Med. Res. 44, 329–374 (1924).

  2. 2.

    , & Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 741–751 (2008).

  3. 3.

    in Genetics of Distinct Vectors of Disease (ed. Wright, J.) Ch. 7, 251 (Elsevier, 1967).

  4. 4.

    & New hypothesis of the cause of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens L. Nature 232, 657–658 (1971).

  5. 5.

    , & A bacterial symbiont in the Bacteroidetes induces cytoplasmic incompatibility in the parasitoid wasp Encarsia pergandiella. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270, 2185–2190 (2003).

  6. 6.

    & Rapid spread of an inherited incompatibility factor in California Drosophila. Nature 353, 440–442 (1991).

  7. 7.

    , & Wolbachia-induced incompatibility precedes other hybrid incompatibilities in Nasonia. Nature 409, 707–710 (2001).

  8. 8.

    , , & Wolbachia distribution and cytoplasmic incompatibility during sperm development: the cyst as the basic cellular unit of CI expression. Mech. Dev. 120, 185–198 (2003).

  9. 9.

    A genetic test of the mechanism of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila. Genetics 154, 771–776 (2000).

  10. 10.

    , & On the mechanism of Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility: confronting the models with the facts. BioEssays 25, 259–265 (2003).

  11. 11.

    , & in Insect Symbiosis Vol. 1 (eds Bourtzis, K. & Miller, T. A.) Ch. 14 (CRC, 2003).

  12. 12.

    The evolution of cytoplasmic incompatibility or when spite can be successful. J. Theor. Biol. 148, 269–277 (1991).

  13. 13.

    , & Identification of Wolbachia—host interacting factors through cytological analysis. Microbes Infect. 5, 999–1011 (2003).

  14. 14.

    , & Wolbachia-induced delay of paternal chromatin condensation does not prevent maternal chromosomes from entering anaphase in incompatible crosses of Drosophila simulans. J. Cell Sci. 110(Pt 2), 271–280 (1997).

  15. 15.

    & Induction of paternal genome loss by the paternal-sex-ratio chromosome and cytoplasmic incompatibility bacteria (Wolbachia): a comparative study of early embryonic events. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 40, 408–418 (1995).

  16. 16.

    & Detection of the Wolbachia protein WPIP0282 in mosquito spermathecae: implications for cytoplasmic incompatibility. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 867–878 (2013).

  17. 17.

    , & Substrate specificity of the ubiquitin and Ubl proteases. Cell Res. 26, 441–456 (2016).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Realm of PD-(D/E)XK nuclease superfamily revisited: detection of novel families with modified transitive meta profile searches. BMC Struct. Biol. 7, 40 (2007).

  19. 19.

    & Wolbachia infections in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: polymorphism and levels of cytoplasmic incompatibility. Genetica 120, 51–59 (2004).

  20. 20.

    et al. Wolbachia invades Anopheles stephensi populations and induces refractoriness to Plasmodium infection. Science 340, 748–751 (2013).

  21. 21.

    , & Wolbachia establishment and invasion in an Aedes aegypti laboratory population. Science 310, 326–328 (2005).

  22. 22.

    & A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398, 246–251 (1999).

  23. 23.

    et al. Stabilization of an unusual salt bridge in ubiquitin by the extra C-terminal domain of the proteasome-associated deubiquitinase UCH37 as a mechanism of its exo specificity. Biochemistry 52, 3564–3578 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline. Mech. Dev. 78, 113–118 (1998).

  25. 25.

    , , & Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 166, 1775–1782 (2004).

  26. 26.

    & A novel approach for directing transgene expression in Drosophila: T2A-Gal4 in-frame fusion. Genetics 190, 1139–1144 (2012).

  27. 27.

    , , & Induced paternal effects mimic cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila. Genetics 173, 727–734 (2006).

  28. 28.

    , , & Mitotic defects associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 67, 55–64 (1996).

  29. 29.

    , , & Wolbachia-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility is associated with impaired histone deposition in the male pronucleus. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000343 (2009).

  30. 30.

    Biology of Wolbachia. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 587–609 (1997).

  31. 31.

    & Decapitation improves detection of Wolbachia pipientis (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes by the polymerase chain reaction. J. Med. Entomol. 49, 1103–1108 (2012).

  32. 32.

    , , & Site-directed, ligase-independent mutagenesis (SLIM): a single-tube methodology approaching 100% efficiency in 4 h. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e174 (2004).

  33. 33.

    et al. Insights into the mechanism of deubiquitination by JAMM deubiquitinases from cocrystal structures of the enzyme with the substrate and product. Biochemistry 53, 3199–3217 (2014).

  34. 34.

    et al. Structural basis of substrate recognition by a bacterial deubiquitinase important for dynamics of phagosome ubiquitination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15090–15095 (2015).

  35. 35.

    & Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) for routine immunoblotting: an inexpensive alternative to commercially available kits. Spermatogenesis 1, 121–122 (2011).

  36. 36.

    , & NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

  37. 37.

    & (eds) Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology. Vol. 194, 1–863 (Elsevier, 1991).

  38. 38.

    et al. Shaggy/glycogen synthase kinase 3β and phosphorylation of Sarah/regulator of calcineurin are essential for completion of Drosophila female meiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6382–6389 (2012).

  39. 39.

    , & Drosophila Protocols (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2000).

  40. 40.

    et al. Screening of DUB activity and specificity by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 5, 4763 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank A. Fallon, R. Tomko Jr and A. Chavez for critical review of the manuscript, L. Klasson for sharing preliminary data, H. Frydman and L. Cooley for fly lines, J. Carlson, K. Menuz, P. Graham and C. Yam for support with fly experimentation, C. Schlieker for use of instruments and C. Das and M. Sheedlo for HA-Ub-VME. Funding was provided by USDA-NIFA postdoctoral fellowship 2014-67012-22268 (to J.F.B.), the Marion Brooks-Wallace fellowship (to J.F.B.) and National Institutes of Health grant GM053756 (to M.H.).

Author information

Author notes

    • John F. Beckmann
    •  & Judith A. Ronau

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry, Yale University, 266 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

    • John F. Beckmann
    • , Judith A. Ronau
    •  & Mark Hochstrasser
  2. Department of Molecular, Cellular, & Developmental Biology, Yale University, 266 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

    • Mark Hochstrasser

Authors

  1. Search for John F. Beckmann in:

  2. Search for Judith A. Ronau in:

  3. Search for Mark Hochstrasser in:

Contributions

J.F.B. and J.A.R. are equal contributors in the conception and performance of the experiments as well as writing of the manuscript. M.H. conceived experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Hochstrasser.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–9, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary References.

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

    Construct Database and Primer Database.