Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

irCLIP platform for efficient characterization of protein–RNA interactions

Abstract

The complexity of transcriptome-wide protein–RNA interaction networks is incompletely understood. While emerging studies are greatly expanding the known universe of RNA-binding proteins, methods for the discovery and characterization of protein–RNA interactions remain resource intensive and technically challenging. Here we introduce a UV-C crosslinking and immunoprecipitation platform, irCLIP, which provides an ultraefficient, fast, and nonisotopic method for the detection of protein–RNA interactions using far less material than standard protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ultrasensitive, efficient, and fast CLIP platform facilitates low cell number CLIP.
Figure 2: irCLIP produces high-quality data sets with greatly reduced cellular inputs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Brimacombe, R., Stiege, W., Kyriatsoulis, A. & Maly, P. Methods Enzymol. 164, 287–309 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ule, J., Jensen, K., Mele, A. & Darnell, R.B. Methods 37, 376–386 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Licatalosi, D.D. et al. Nature 456, 464–469 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chi, S.W., Zang, J.B., Mele, A. & Darnell, R.B. Nature 460, 479–486 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Xue, Y. et al. Mol. Cell 36, 996–1006 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hafner, M. et al. Cell 141, 129–141 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lebedeva, S. et al. Mol. Cell 43, 340–352 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. König, J. et al. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 909–915 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zarnack, K. et al. Cell 152, 453–466 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weyn-Vanhentenryck, S.M. et al. Cell Rep. 6, 1139–1152 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Flynn, R.A. et al. RNA 21, 135–143 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castello, A. et al. Cell 149, 1393–1406 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baltz, A.G. et al. Mol. Cell 46, 674–690 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwon, S.C. et al. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1122–1130 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore, M.J. et al. Nat. Protoc. 9, 263–293 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Huppertz, I. et al. Methods 65, 274–287 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kulak, N.A., Pichler, G., Paron, I., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Nat. Methods 11, 319–324 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Urlaub, H., Hartmuth, K. & Lührmann, R. Methods 26, 170–181 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Choe, W.S. & Middelberg, A.P. Biotechnol. Prog. 17, 1107–1113 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohr, S. et al. RNA 19, 958–970 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Fire, P. Sarnow, and M. Kay for presubmission review. We thank L. Morcom and P. Bernstein for expert administrative assistance and members of the Khavari lab for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the US VA Office of Research and Development, NIH AR49737 and NIH CA142635 (P.A.K.), P50-HG007735 and R01-ES023168 (H.Y.C.), and the Stanford Medical Scientist Program and NIH 1F30CA189514-01 (R.A.F.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.J.Z. designed and executed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript with input from the coauthor R.A.F. R.A.F. and B.T.D. designed the FAST-iCLIP pipeline for analysis of ir/iCLIP data. Y.S. executed statistical analysis of ir/iCLIP data replicates. P.A.K. and H.Y.C. designed experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A Khavari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 irCLIP adapter construction, quantitation and validation

(a) Construction schematic for generation of the pre-adenylated, IR800CW dye conjugated irCLIP DNA adapter. (b) Odyssey CLx infrared scan and (c) quantitation of serial diluted irCLIP adapter showing 5 orders of magnitude sensitivity on nitrocellulose. (d) Autoradiogram and Odyssey CLx infrared scan demonstrating efficient ligation of γ-32P-labeled hnRNP-C-RNA complexes with the irCLIP adapter, evidenced by supershifting of unligated complexes (black vs green box, left panel) and RNase A (in-lysate digestion, 50 ng/ml) dependence for generation of irCLIP adapter signal (right panel). (e) Autoradiograms (left and middle panels) and Odyssey CLx infrared scan (right panel) of a 3-fold serial dilution of γ-32P -labeled, irCLIP-adapter ligated hnRNP-C-RNA complexes.

Supplementary Figure 2 On-bead S1 nuclease digestion improves RNA digestion profile for multiple classes of RBPs

Equivalent amounts of UV-C treated HeLa cell extracts were pre-digested with RNase A at 50, 16.7, or 5.6 ng/mL for 10 min at 37°C or digested post-immunoprecipitation with S1 nuclease at 9 or 3 U/μL for 15 min at 30°C, ligated overnight with the irCLIP-adapter, resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. (a-d) Odyssey CLx infrared scans of the nitrocellulose bound immunoprecipitates using antibodies against the RRM domain proteins (a) hnRNP-C, 37 kDa (b) HuR, 39 kDa, the RNA-helicase-domain protein DDX5, 73 kDa (c), and the double-stranded-RNA-binding domain protein ILF3, 90 and 110 kDa (d). (e-h) Quantitation of optimal ligations, 40-100 nucleotide RNA fragments (~30-60 kDa window above RBP size) for hnRNP-C, HuR, DDX5, and ILF3, respectively.

Supplementary Figure 3 Comparison of on-bead nuclease digestions for multiple classes of RBPs

Batch immunoprecipitations were equally divided immediately prior to on-bead nuclease digestions. All reactions (see Methods) were incubated for 15 min at 30°C and each nuclease tested at 3 doses along a 4-fold serial dilution (RNase 1 0.4-0.1-0.025 U/μL, RNase A 20-5-1.25 ng/mL, S1 12-4-1 U/μL). Overnight irCLIP-adapter ligated RNP-complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Odyssey CLx infrared scans of the nitrocellulose bound immunoprecipitates for (a) hnRNPC, 37 kDa, (b) HuR 39 kDa, (c) DDX5, 73 kDa and (d) ILF3 90 and 110 kDa. Quantitation of target ligations, 40-100 nucleotide RNA fragments (~30-60 kDa window above RBP size), (e-h) for hnRNP-C, HuR, DDX5, and ILF3, respectively.

Supplementary Figure 4 Optimized recovery of ligated RNA-peptide fragments

irCLIP-adapter ligated hnRNP-C-RNA complexes were diluted in 1xLDS sample buffer and equally divided between 36 lanes for resolution by SDS-PAGE. Identical sections, 65-100 kDa, of nitrocellulose were excised for comparison of proteinase K digestion parameters. (a) Infrared Odyssey CLx scan of representative nitrocellose dot blots and (b) quantitation of precipitated, irCLIP-adapter ligated RNA from proteinase K digestions with the indicated additives at the indicated temperatures. (c) Free irCLIP-adapter and representative RNA samples from (a) were resolved by denaturing PAGE and imaged on an infrared Odyssey CLx.

Supplementary Figure 5 irCLIP enhancement of cDNA synthesis and cDNA purification

irCLIP-ligated RNA was purified from hnRNP-C-RNA complexes. 1 femtomole was used as starting material for quadruplicate cDNA synthesis reactions using Super Script III (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol or TGIRT-III (InGex) reverse transcriptase (Methods). cDNA was purified and amplified according to irCLIP library construction (Methods). (a) Histogram of relative amplification of SuperScript III vs TGIRT-III PCR1 (Methods) reactions. The average Ct values of SuperScript III were used as control. 1 femtomole of IR800CW-cDNA primer was purified in triplicate with the Qiagen Nucleotide Removal Kit, the Zymo Oligo Clean and Concentrator Kit per manufacturer’s instructions or with 2 volumes of AMPure beads and 5 volumes of isopropanol for 15 min. (b) Histogram of quantitated nitrocellulose dot blots of purified IR800CW-cDNA primer. Percent capture is the average of triplicate purifications.

Supplementary Figure 6 Controls for irCLIP experiments

(a) HeLa cells were untreated or subjected to the indicated doses of UVC. RNA was isolated and resolved by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis showing high quality intact RNA for the highest dose of UV-C, 0.3J/cm2. Odyssey CLx infrared immunoblot analyses of UV-crosslinked HeLa cell extracts showing antibody specificity and IP efficiency for (b) hnRNPC, (c) HuR and (d) PTBP1. Input lanes (b-d) were loaded at 100% of total IP. Specific bands were quantitated using LiCor Image Studio software. For IPs, 1 μg of antibody was incubated with 10μg of lysate for hnRNPC or 30μg of lysate for HuR and PTBP1. For buffer and wash conditions see Methods.

Supplementary Figure 7 irCLIP produces high quality data sets from greatly reduced cellular inputs

Pearson correlations of RT stops between biological replicates of 100,000 cell irCLIP experiments for (a) PTBP1 and (b) HuR. (c) Histogram of the unique read fractions and total clusters of the deeply sequenced biological replicates of irCLIP of PTBP1 and HuR. (d) Pearson correlations of the RT stops within the significant clusters (>100,000 per RBP) identified in the deeply sequenced irCLIP data sets for hnRNP-C, PTBP1, and HuR. Low R2 values indicated highly unique clusters for each RBP.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–7, and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. (PDF 1690 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarnegar, B., Flynn, R., Shen, Y. et al. irCLIP platform for efficient characterization of protein–RNA interactions. Nat Methods 13, 489–492 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3840

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3840

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing