Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Policy needed for additive manufacturing

The successful adoption of metallic additive manufacturing in aviation will require investment in basic scientific understanding of the process, defining of standards and adaptive regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ni-based superalloy (Inconel 718) turbine blades for jet engines produced by direct laser metal sintering, a form of metallic additive manufacturing (MAM).

References

  1. Report to the President on Ensuring American Leadership in Advanced Manufacturing (President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2011); http://go.nature.com/28SuW29

  2. Rockefeller, J. D. Opening Statement of Hon. John D. Rockefeller IV, U. S. Senator from West Virginia (US Government Publishing Office, 2013); http://go.nature.com/29PmbY0

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vayre, B., Vignat, F. & Villeneuve, F. Mech. & Ind. 13, 89–96 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyons, B. In The Bridge Vol. 42, 13–19 (National Academy of Engineering, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Exhibit 7 U.S. Exports of Goods by End-Use Category and Commodity (U.S. Census Bureau, 2015).

  6. Khaled, T. Casting Factors Report ANM-112N-13-05 (Federal Aviation Administration, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frazier, W. E. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23, 1917–1928 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 14 CFR 25.613: Material Strength Properties and Material Design Values (US Code of Federal Regulations, 1999); https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/25.613

  9. 14 CFR 25.621: Casting Factors (US Code of Federal Regulations, 2002); https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/25.621

  10. Caffrey, T., Campbell, I. & Wohlers, T. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry (Wohlers Associates, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Research Council. Advanced Organic Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures: Future Program (The National Academies Press, 1987).

  12. 3D Printing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Policy Implications of Additive Manufacturing (GAO, 2015).

  13. Rogers, C. Advanced Composite Materials: The Air Force's Role In Technology Development (RAND, 1992).

  14. Slotwinski, J. & Moylan, S. Applicability of Existing Materials Testing Standards for Additive Manufacturing Materials (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss, M. B. H. & Sirbu, M. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 1, 111–133 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Advanced Materials by Design OTAE-351 (US Government Printing Office, 1998).

  17. MacPherson, A. & Pritchard, D. J. Labor Res. 28, 552–566 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness (NSTC, 2011).

  19. General Aviation Task Force Report (NASA, 1993).

  20. National Research Council. Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers: A Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (The National Academies Press, 2002).

  21. Plumer, B. Is outsourcing to blame for Boeing's 787 Dreamliner woes? The Washington Post http://go.nature.com/28UXfwo (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based System for Overseeing Aircraft Manufacturers' Suppliers Report Number AV-2008-026 (Federal Aviation Adminstration, 2008).

  23. http://www.airbus.com/company/americas/us/

  24. Watkins, T. et al. Adv. Mater. Process. 171, 23–27 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work on which this Commentary is based was supported by Carnegie Mellon University and the CMU–Portugal Program, as well as by funding from the Portuguese Science and Technology Fund (FCT), under project reference CMUP-ERI/TPE/0011/2013. The views expressed are those of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parth Vaishnav.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonnín Roca, J., Vaishnav, P., Fuchs, E. et al. Policy needed for additive manufacturing. Nature Mater 15, 815–818 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4658

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4658

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing