Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

The National Institutes of Health and clinical research: a progress report

The development of clinical investigators remains a thorny national problem. The National Institutes of Health has instituted new granting programs to support clinical research that have already stimulated 450 new applications for support; private foundations have also joined the effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Numbers of first-time applications for NIH research grants from PhDs, MDs and MD/PhDs (data courtesy of Dr. Belinda Seto, National Institutes of Health).

References

  1. Report of the NIH Director's Panel on Clinical Research (Advisory Committee to the NIH Director, Bethesda, Maryland, 1997).

  2. Nathan, D.G. Clinical research perceptions, reality and proposed solutions. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 280, 1427–1431 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schechter, A.N. Endangering the half-century National Institutes of Health concensus. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 280, 1440–1442 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shine, K.L. Encouraging clinical research by physician scientists. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 280, 1442–1444 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy, E.M. S1421: The Clinical Research Enhancement Act of 1997 S. 1421, 105th Cong., 1st Sess., (1997)

  6. Lowey, R. HR3001: The Clinical Research Enhancement Act of 1997 H.R. 3001, 105th Cong., 1st Sess. (1997).

  7. Zemlo TR, et al. The physician-scientist: Career issues and challenges at the year 2000. FASEB J. 14, 221–230 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Physician-Scientist Tracking Project. in HHMI-AAMC Comparison of Matriculation and Graduation Interest in Research Through 1999 Chevy Chase, MD, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (1999).

  9. Daniel H. Funkenstein. In Medical Students, Medical Schools and Society During Five Eras: Factors Affecting the Career Choices of Physicians 1958–1976 (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenberg, L.E. Physician-scientists—endangered and essential. Science 283, 331–332 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein, J.L. & Brown, M.S. The clinical investigator: Bewitched, bothered, and bewildered—but still beloved. J. Clin. Invest. 99, 2803–2812 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nathan, D., Varmus, H. The National Institutes of Health and clinical research: a progress report. Nat Med 6, 1201–1204 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/81282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/81282

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing