Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

An essential role for Fas ligand in transplantation tolerance induced by donor bone marrow

Abstract

Medawar and co-workers originally demonstrated that injection of donor bone marrow (DBM) into immuno-incompetent neonatal rodents could induce tolerance to grafts from animals of the same strain as the bone marrow donor1. Induction of tolerance in this manner can also be accomplished in mature mice, dogs and monkeys if the resident T-cell populations in the recipient are depleted by a polyclonal antithymocyte globulin or an anti-T cell immunotoxin2–4. The molecular mechanisms by which bone marrow cells mediate the induction of tolerance remain uncertain. Here we examined a well-established adult mouse model of antithymocyte globulin and DBM treatment and show that expression of functional Fas ligand (FasL, also CD95L) on the injected bone marrow cells is required for tolerance induction. The results indicate that a state of microchimerism perse is insufficient for the induction of tolerance in T cell-depleted transplant recipients. Moreover, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that tolerance induced by DBM involves an apoptotic process leading to deletion of graft-reactive cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Billingham, R.E., Brent, L. & Medawar, P.B. ‘Actively acquired tolerance‘ of foreign cells. Nature 172, 603–606 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartner, W.C. et al. Specific tolerance to canine renal allografts following treatment with fractionated bone marrow and antilymphocyte serum. Transplant. Proc. 19, 476–477 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gozzo, J.J., Wood, M.L. & Monaco, A.P. Use of allogenic, homozygous bone marrow cells for the induction of specific immunologic tolerance in mice treated with antilymphocyte serum. Surg. Forum 21, 281–284 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas, J.M. et al. Renal allograft tolerance induced with ATG and donor bone marrow in outbred rhesus monkeys. Transplantation 36, 104–106 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Monaco, A.P., Wood, M.L., Maki, T. & Gozzo, J.J. The use of donor-specific bone marrow to induce specific unresponsiveness (tolerance) to tissue allografts. Chimerism and Tolerance (ed. lldstad, K.J.) 99–113 (Landes, Austin, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi, T. et al. Generalized lymphoproliferative disease in mice, caused by a point mutation in the Fas ligand. Cell 76, 969–976 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharabi, Y., Abraham, V.S., Sykes, M. & Sachs, D.H. Mixed allogeneic chimeras prepared by a non-myelablative regimen: requirement for chimerism to maintain tolerance. Bone Marrow Transplant 9, 191–197 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, J.P., Kasten-jolly, J., >Field, L.J. & Thomas, J.M. Assessment of donor bone marrow cell-derived chimerism in transplantation tolerance using transgenic mice. Transplantation 58, 324–329 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Starzl, T.E. et al. The lost chord: Microchimerism and allograft survival [review]. Immunol. Today 17, 577–84; discussion 588 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lubaroff, D.M. & Silvers, W.K. Importance of chimerism in maintaining tolerance of skin allografts in mice. J. Immunol. 111, 65–71 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergstrom, D.E. et al. An expanded collection of mouse Y chromosome RDA clones. Mammal. Genome 8, 510–512 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagata, S. & Suda, T. Fas and Fas ligand: lpr and gld mutations [review]. Immunol. Today 16, 39–43 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Verbanac, K.M., Carver, F.M., Haisch, C.E. & Thomas, J.M. A role for transforming growth factor-beta in the veto mechanism in transplant tolerance. Transplantation 57, 893–900 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas, J.M. et al. Further studies of veto activity in rhesus monkey bone marrow in relation to allograft tolerance and chimerism. Transplantation 57, 101–115 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, L., Fung-Leung, W. & Miller, R.G. Down-regulation of CD8 on mature antigen-reactive T cells as a mechanism of peripheral tolerance. J. Immunol. 155, 3464–3471 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, P.J. Donor CD8 cells prevent allogeneic marrow graft rejection in mice: Potential implications for marrow transplantation in humans. J. Exp. Med. 178, 703–712 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaufman, C.L. et al. Phenotypic characterization of a novel bone marrow-derived cell that facilitates engraftment of allogeneic bone marrow stem cells. Blood 84, 2436–2446 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wood, K.J. Antigen induced tolerance. Chimerism and Tolerance (ed. lldstad, K.J.) 15–29 (Landes, Austin, 1995).

  19. Sayegh, M.H. & Turka, L.A. T cell costimulatory pathways: Promising novel targets for immunosuppression and tolerance induction [editorial]. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 6, 1143–1150 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ju, S.T., et al. Fas(CD95)/FasL interactions required for programmed cell death after T-cell activation [see comments]. Nature 373, 444–448 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

George, J., Sweeney, S., Kirklin, J. et al. An essential role for Fas ligand in transplantation tolerance induced by donor bone marrow. Nat Med 4, 333–335 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0398-333

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0398-333

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing