Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

The future of genetic research on neurodegeneration

Abstract

Why, with all the progress in the field of neurodegeneration, do we still lack disease-modifying drugs that tackle the primary defect of severe cell loss? How much progress has been made toward this goal? Have we spent our time and resources wisely? And, most important, is there room for improvement? This commentary highlights several problems faced by researchers in studying the genetic etiology of neurodegenerative diseases and seeks to provide direction in overcoming some of these obstacles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. St. George-Hyslop, P. et al. Nat. Genet. 2, 330–334 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. St. George-Hyslop, P. et al. Science 235, 885–890 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goate, A. et al. Nature 349, 704–706 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sherrington, R. et al. Nature 375, 754–760 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Broeckhoven, C. et al. Nat. Genet. 2, 335–339 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Levy-Lahad, E. et al. Science 269, 973–977 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogaev, E.I. et al. Nature 376, 775–778 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Broeckhoven, C. et al. Science 248, 1120–1122 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bertram, L. & Tanzi, R.E. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13 Spec No 1, R135–R141 (2004).

  10. Corder, E.H. et al. Science 261, 921–923 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sleegers, K. et al. Trends Genet. 26, 84–93 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harold, D. et al. Nat. Genet. 41, 1088–1093 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lambert, J.C. et al. Nat. Genet. 41, 1094–1099 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Deerlin, V.M. et al. Nat. Genet. 42, 234–239 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Teslovich, T.M. et al. Nature 466, 707–713 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambert, J.C. et al. J. Alzheimers Dis. 20, 1107–1118 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, L. et al. Alzheimers Dement. 6, S113 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aisen, P.S. Lancet Neurol. 1, 279–284 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Trompet, S. et al. J. Neurol. 257, 85–90 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yerbury, J.J. et al. FASEB J. 21, 2312–2322 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kauwe, J.S. et al. J. Alzheimers Dis. published online, 10.3233/JAD-2010-091711 (15 July 2010).

  22. Potkin, S.G. et al. PLoS One 4, e6501 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shulman, J.M. et al. PLoS One 5, e11244 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rademakers, R. et al. Hum. Mutat. 22, 409–411 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dermaut, B. et al. Ann. Neurol. 55, 617–626 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sleegers, K., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 71–88 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bettens, K., Sleegers, K. & Van Broeckhoven, C. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, R4–R11 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baker, M. et al. Nature 442, 916–919 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cruts, M. et al. Nature 442, 920–924 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Deerlin, V.M. et al. Lancet Neurol. 7, 409–416 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sreedharan, J. et al. Science 319, 1668–1672 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kabashi, E. et al. Nat. Genet. 40, 572–574 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwiatkowski, T.J. Jr. et al. Science 323, 1205–1208 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vance, C. et al. Science 323, 1208–1211 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rademakers, R. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 643–652 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sleegers, K. & Van Broeckhoven, C. Nature 458, 415–417 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Brouwers, N. et al. Neurology 71, 656–664 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Zee, J. et al. Hum. Mutat. 28, 416 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sleegers, K. et al. Ann. Neurol. 65, 603–609 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zuchner, S., Beecham, G., Haines, J. & Pericak-Vance, M.A. Alzheimers Dement. 6, S74 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Di Fede, G. et al. Science 323, 1473–1477 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tomiyama, T. et al. Ann. Neurol. 63, 377–387 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Clarimón, J. et al. Neurobiol. Aging 30, 1986–1991 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nalls, M.A. et al. Neurogenetics 10, 183–190 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nuytemans, K., Theuns, J., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. Hum. Mutat. 31, 763–780 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rovelet-Lecrux, A. et al. Nat. Genet. 38, 24–26 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Rovelet-Lecrux, A. et al. J. Alzheimers Dis. published online, 10.3233/JAD-2010-100441 (15 July 2010).

  48. Gijselinck, I. et al. Hum. Mutat. 29, 53–58 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Theuns, J. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 936–946 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Beecham, G.W. et al. Alzheimers Dement. 6, S113 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A number of the issues identified in this commentary were discussed in a session on genetics at the Herrenhausen Symposium on Neurodegeneration with P. St. George-Hyslop, P. Heutink and B. De Strooper, with added discussion points and commentary provided by the attendees at the conference. The research in my group has been funded by the Flemish and Federal governments of Belgium, the VIB, the Institute Born-Bunge and the University of Antwerp, as well as by many national and international governmental research funding agencies and charity organizations. The main contributors, however, are the many people with neurodegenerative disease and their families that generously participate in research and the efforts of researchers to pave the way toward new therapeutics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Van Broeckhoven.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Broeckhoven, C. The future of genetic research on neurodegeneration. Nat Med 16, 1215–1217 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2225

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2225

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing