Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A TRAF-like motif of the inducible costimulator ICOS controls development of germinal center TFH cells via the kinase TBK1

An Erratum to this article was published on 19 July 2016

This article has been updated

Abstract

Signaling via the inducible costimulator ICOS fuels the stepwise development of follicular helper T cells (TFH cells). However, a signaling pathway unique to ICOS has not been identified. We found here that the kinase TBK1 associated with ICOS via a conserved motif, IProx, that shares homology with the tumor-necrosis-factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factors TRAF2 and TRAF3. Disruption of this motif abolished the association of TBK1 with ICOS, TRAF2 and TRAF3, which identified a TBK1-binding consensus. Alteration of this motif in ICOS or depletion of TBK1 in T cells severely impaired the differentiation of germinal center (GC) TFH cells and the development of GCs, interfered with B cell differentiation and disrupted the development of antibody responses, but the IProx motif and TBK1 were dispensable for the early differentiation of TFH cells. These results reveal a previously unknown ICOS-TBK1 signaling pathway that specifies the commitment of GC TFH cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Importance of the newly identified ICOS signaling motif in TFH cell development.
Figure 2: ICOS-TBK1 interaction.
Figure 3: TBK1 is required for TFH cell differentiation.
Figure 4: The IProx ICOS motif is dispensable for the development of nascent TFH cells.
Figure 5: TBK1 is dispensable for the differentiation of nascent TFH cells.
Figure 6: Molecular basis of the ICOS-TBK1 interaction.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 20 May 2016

    In the version of this article initially published online, in the keys in Figure 3i–l, the Icos-specific shRNA was incorrectly designated 'sh/cos'. The correct designation is 'shIcos'. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

References

  1. Victora, G.D. & Nussenzweig, M.C. Germinal centers. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 429–457 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crotty, S. A brief history of T cell help to B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 185–189 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramiscal, R.R. & Vinuesa, C.G. T-cell subsets in the germinal center. Immunol. Rev. 252, 146–155 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Craft, J.E. Follicular helper T cells in immunity and systemic autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 337–347 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Haynes, N.M. et al. Role of CXCR5 and CCR7 in follicular Th cell positioning and appearance of a programmed cell death gene-1high germinal center-associated subpopulation. J. Immunol. 179, 5099–5108 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston, R.J. et al. Bcl6 and Blimp-1 are reciprocal and antagonistic regulators of T follicular helper cell differentiation. Science 325, 1006–1010 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nurieva, R.I. et al. Bcl6 mediates the development of T follicular helper cells. Science 325, 1001–1005 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu, D. et al. The transcriptional repressor Bcl-6 directs T follicular helper cell lineage commitment. Immunity 31, 457–468 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi, Y.S. et al. ICOS receptor instructs T follicular helper cell versus effector cell differentiation via induction of the transcriptional repressor Bcl6. Immunity 34, 932–946 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitano, M. et al. Bcl6 protein expression shapes pre-germinal center B cell dynamics and follicular helper T cell heterogeneity. Immunity 34, 961–972 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein, J.S. et al. B cells in T follicular helper cell development and function: separable roles in delivery of ICOS ligand and antigen. J. Immunol. 192, 3166–3179 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yusuf, I. et al. Germinal center T follicular helper cell IL-4 production is dependent on signaling lymphocytic activation molecule receptor (CD150). J. Immunol. 185, 190–202 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sage, P.T., Francisco, L.M., Carman, C.V. & Sharpe, A.H. The receptor PD-1 controls follicular regulatory T cells in the lymph nodes and blood. Nat. Immunol. 14, 152–161 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bossaller, L. et al. ICOS deficiency is associated with a severe reduction of CXCR5+CD4 germinal center Th cells. J. Immunol. 177, 4927–4932 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimbacher, B. et al. Homozygous loss of ICOS is associated with adult-onset common variable immunodeficiency. Nat. Immunol. 4, 261–268 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dong, C. et al. ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function. Nature 409, 97–101 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McAdam, A.J. et al. ICOS is critical for CD40-mediated antibody class switching. Nature 409, 102–105 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tafuri, A. et al. ICOS is essential for effective T-helper-cell responses. Nature 409, 105–109 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mak, T.W. et al. Costimulation through the inducible costimulator ligand is essential for both T helper and B cell functions in T cell-dependent B cell responses. Nat. Immunol. 4, 765–772 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coyle, A.J. et al. The CD28-related molecule ICOS is required for effective T cell-dependent immune responses. Immunity 13, 95–105 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fos, C. et al. ICOS ligation recruits the p50alpha PI3K regulatory subunit to the immunological synapse. J. Immunol. 181, 1969–1977 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong, K.F. et al. Protein kinase C-η controls CTLA-4-mediated regulatory T cell function. Nat. Immunol. 15, 465–472 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kong, K.F. et al. A motif in the V3 domain of the kinase PKC-θ determines its localization in the immunological synapse and functions in T cells via association with CD28. Nat. Immunol. 12, 1105–1112 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudd, C.E. & Schneider, H. Unifying concepts in CD28, ICOS and CTLA4 co-receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 544–556 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gigoux, M. et al. Inducible costimulator promotes helper T-cell differentiation through phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20371–20376 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, J. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent signaling pathways contribute to ICOS-mediated T cell costimulation in acute graft-versus-host disease in mice. J. Immunol. 191, 200–207 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rolf, J. et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in T cells regulates the magnitude of the germinal center reaction. J. Immunol. 185, 4042–4052 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nance, J.P. et al. Bcl6 middle domain repressor function is required for T follicular helper cell differentiation and utilizes the corepressor MTA3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13324–13329 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Akira, S. & Takeda, K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 499–511 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goenka, R. et al. Cutting edge: dendritic cell-restricted antigen presentation initiates the follicular helper T cell program but cannot complete ultimate effector differentiation. J. Immunol. 187, 1091–1095 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barnett, L.G. et al. B cell antigen presentation in the initiation of follicular helper T cell and germinal center differentiation. J. Immunol. 192, 3607–3617 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tubo, N.J. et al. Single naive CD4+ T cells from a diverse repertoire produce different effector cell types during infection. Cell 153, 785–796 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Häcker, H. et al. Specificity in Toll-like receptor signalling through distinct effector functions of TRAF3 and TRAF6. Nature 439, 204–207 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sato, S. et al. Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF) associates with TNF receptor-associated factor 6 and TANK-binding kinase 1, and activates two distinct transcription factors, NF-κ B and IFN-regulatory factor-3, in the Toll-like receptor signaling. J. Immunol. 171, 4304–4310 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharma, S. et al. Triggering the interferon antiviral response through an IKK-related pathway. Science 300, 1148–1151 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fitzgerald, K.A. et al. IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway. Nat. Immunol. 4, 491–496 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McWhirter, S.M. et al. Crystallographic analysis of CD40 recognition and signaling by human TRAF2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8408–8413 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bonnard, M. et al. Deficiency of T2K leads to apoptotic liver degeneration and impaired NF-κB-dependent gene transcription. EMBO J. 19, 4976–4985 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Jin, J. et al. The kinase TBK1 controls IgA class switching by negatively regulating noncanonical NF-κB signaling. Nat. Immunol. 13, 1101–1109 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ishii, K.J. et al. TANK-binding kinase-1 delineates innate and adaptive immune responses to DNA vaccines. Nature 451, 725–729 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pomerantz, J.L. & Baltimore, D. NF-κB activation by a signaling complex containing TRAF2, TANK and TBK1, a novel IKK-related kinase. EMBO J. 18, 6694–6704 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Oganesyan, G. et al. Critical role of TRAF3 in the Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent antiviral response. Nature 439, 208–211 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Li, C. et al. Structurally distinct recognition motifs in lymphotoxin-β receptor and CD40 for tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF)-mediated signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50523–50529 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Linterman, M.A. et al. Roquin differentiates the specialized functions of duplicated T cell costimulatory receptor genes CD28 and ICOS. Immunity 30, 228–241 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Linterman, M.A. et al. CD28 expression is required after T cell priming for helper T cell responses and protective immunity to infection. eLife 3, 3 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Weber, J.P. et al. ICOS maintains the T follicular helper cell phenotype by down-regulating Krüppel-like factor 2. J. Exp. Med. 212, 217–233 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Leavenworth, J.W., Verbinnen, B., Yin, J., Huang, H. & Cantor, H. A p85α-osteopontin axis couples the receptor ICOS to sustained Bcl-6 expression by follicular helper and regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 16, 96–106 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nurieva, R.I. et al. Generation of T follicular helper cells is mediated by interleukin-21 but independent of T helper 1, 2, or 17 cell lineages. Immunity 29, 138–149 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Xu, H. et al. Follicular T-helper cell recruitment governed by bystander B cells and ICOS-driven motility. Nature 496, 523–527 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sanjo, H., Zajonc, D.M., Braden, R., Norris, P.S. & Ware, C.F. Allosteric regulation of the ubiquitin:NIK and ubiquitin:TRAF3 E3 ligases by the lymphotoxin-β receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 17148–17155 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen, R. et al. In vivo RNA interference screens identify regulators of antiviral CD4+ and CD8+ T cell differentiation. Immunity 41, 325–338 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J.R. III. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 242–247 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu, T. et al. ProLuCID: An improved SEQUEST-like algorithm with enhanced sensitivity and specificity. J. Proteomics 129, 16–24 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tabb, D.L., McDonald, W.H. & Yates, J.R. III. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1, 21–26 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Park, S.K., Venable, J.D., Xu, T. & Yates, J.R. III. A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 5, 319–322 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Altman and Crotty laboratories for discussions; the Flow Cytometry Core Unit, the Microscopy Unit and the Animal Husbandry Unit of the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology for services; P. Beemiller for imaging and bioinformatics services and assistance in computational analyses of immunohistochemistry with Matlab software; and the National Disease Resource Interchange for clinical samples. Supported by the US National Institutes of Health (CA35299 to A.A.; and AI109976, AI063107 and AI072543 to S.C.) and the Melanoma Research Alliance (Young Investigator Award 270056 to K.-F.K.). This is publication number 1794 from the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.P. and A.J.C.-B. designed experiments, collected data and performed analyses; Y.Z. and J.R.Y. did the proteomics experiments and analyses; J.K.H. did the immunofluorescence and microscopy; Y.S.C. provided reagents and was involved in study design; and A.A., S.C. and K.-F.K. designed the study, analyzed data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shane Crotty or Kok-Fai Kong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Evolutionary conservation of the ICOS cytoplamic tail, and of the ‘serine tongs’ of TRAF2 and TRAF3.

Amino acid sequences of the cytoplamic tail of putative ICOS orthologs from the indicated organisms are shown in a. The conserved proximal (IProx, in red), PI3K-binding YxxM (in blue) and distal (in brown) motifs are indicated. (b,c) Protein sequences of putative TRAF2 (b) and TRAF3 (c) orthologs from indicated organisms were aligned with the IProx motif of human ICOS. Conserved amino acid residues between IProx and TRAFs are indicated in red.

Supplementary Figure 2 Surface expression of reconstituted ICOS and efficiency of the in vivo knockdown of Icos and Tbk1.

(a) Histogram of GFP+ CD4+ T cells from host B6 mice 7 d after adoptive transfer of Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with RV encoding empty vector (EV) or wild-type ICOS (WT) or mIProx, YF or TL mutant and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Cumulative data for a (b) from two independent experiments. (c) Schematic representation of mouse Tbk1 transcript of 2750 bp along with the open reading frame (blue arrow). Regions targeted by shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2 are indicated with short red lines. Diagram not drawn to scale. (dg) Quantitation of Icos (d, e) and Tbk1 (f, g) transcripts in SMARTA CD4+ T cells from host B6 mice 3 d (d, f) or 7 d (e, g) after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Shown are the fold-change (mean ± SEM) from two independent experiments. Each data point represents a single mouse. *P < 0.05; NS, not significant; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections analysis.

Supplementary Figure 3 Quantification of SMARTA CD4+ T cells in the spleen.

(a) Number of reconstituted Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells in host B6 mice 7 d after adoptive transfer of Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with RV encoding empty vector (EV) or wild-type ICOS (WT) or mIProx, YF or TL mutant ICOS and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. (b) Number of SMARTA CD4+ T cells in host B6 mice 7 d after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Shown are cumulative data (mean ± SEM) from two independent experiments. Each data point represents a single mouse. *P < 0.01; NS, not significant; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections analysis.

Supplementary Figure 4 The ICOS IProx motif and TBK1 affect the development of CXCR5+PD1+ GC TFH cells in Bcl6fl/flCD4-Cre mice following immunization with peptide.

(a) Flow cytometry of cells from host CD4-Cre x Bcl6fl/fl mice 10 d after adoptive transfer of Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with RV encoding empty vector (EV) or wild-type ICOS (WT) or mIProx, YF or TL mutant and immunized with KLH-gp61 plus adjuvant. (b) Flow cytometry of cells from host CD4-Cre x Bcl6fl/fl mice 10 d after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and immunized with KLH-gp61 plus adjuvant. Numbers adjacent to outlined areas indicate percent CXCR5+PD1hi GC TFH cells. Cumulative data for a (c), or b (d) from two independent experiments. Each data point represents a single mouse. Shown is mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections.

Supplementary Figure 5 TBK1 is dispensable for the differentiation of nascent TFH cells.

(a) Flow cytometry of cells from host B6 mice 3 d after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Numbers adjacent to outlined areas indicate percent CXCR5+SLAMlo TFH cells. Cumulative data for a (b) from two independent experiments. (c - f) Mean fluorescent intensity of CXCR5 (c), TCRβ (d), CD28 (e) and CD40L (f) protein expressions in CD4+GFP+ T cells. Each data point represents a single mouse. Shown are mean ± SEM; *P < 0.01; NS, not significant; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections.

Supplementary Figure 6 ICOS signalosome is independent of TRAF molecules and IKKɛ.

ICOS immunoprecipitations (IPs) from mouse primary CD4+ T cells activated in vitro with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 and rested in IL-2. Cells were left unstimulated (–) or restimulated with anti-CD3 plus anti-ICOS (+) for 2 minutes. IPs or whole cell lysates (WCL) were immunoblotted with the indicated Abs. 5 % WCL was used as input to control for immunoprecipitation.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 (PDF 819 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pedros, C., Zhang, Y., Hu, J. et al. A TRAF-like motif of the inducible costimulator ICOS controls development of germinal center TFH cells via the kinase TBK1. Nat Immunol 17, 825–833 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3463

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3463

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing