Abstract
Signaling via the inducible costimulator ICOS fuels the stepwise development of follicular helper T cells (TFH cells). However, a signaling pathway unique to ICOS has not been identified. We found here that the kinase TBK1 associated with ICOS via a conserved motif, IProx, that shares homology with the tumor-necrosis-factor receptor (TNFR)-associated factors TRAF2 and TRAF3. Disruption of this motif abolished the association of TBK1 with ICOS, TRAF2 and TRAF3, which identified a TBK1-binding consensus. Alteration of this motif in ICOS or depletion of TBK1 in T cells severely impaired the differentiation of germinal center (GC) TFH cells and the development of GCs, interfered with B cell differentiation and disrupted the development of antibody responses, but the IProx motif and TBK1 were dispensable for the early differentiation of TFH cells. These results reveal a previously unknown ICOS-TBK1 signaling pathway that specifies the commitment of GC TFH cells.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
20 May 2016
In the version of this article initially published online, in the keys in Figure 3i–l, the Icos-specific shRNA was incorrectly designated 'sh/cos'. The correct designation is 'shIcos'. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.
References
Victora, G.D. & Nussenzweig, M.C. Germinal centers. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 429–457 (2012).
Crotty, S. A brief history of T cell help to B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 185–189 (2015).
Ramiscal, R.R. & Vinuesa, C.G. T-cell subsets in the germinal center. Immunol. Rev. 252, 146–155 (2013).
Craft, J.E. Follicular helper T cells in immunity and systemic autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 337–347 (2012).
Haynes, N.M. et al. Role of CXCR5 and CCR7 in follicular Th cell positioning and appearance of a programmed cell death gene-1high germinal center-associated subpopulation. J. Immunol. 179, 5099–5108 (2007).
Johnston, R.J. et al. Bcl6 and Blimp-1 are reciprocal and antagonistic regulators of T follicular helper cell differentiation. Science 325, 1006–1010 (2009).
Nurieva, R.I. et al. Bcl6 mediates the development of T follicular helper cells. Science 325, 1001–1005 (2009).
Yu, D. et al. The transcriptional repressor Bcl-6 directs T follicular helper cell lineage commitment. Immunity 31, 457–468 (2009).
Choi, Y.S. et al. ICOS receptor instructs T follicular helper cell versus effector cell differentiation via induction of the transcriptional repressor Bcl6. Immunity 34, 932–946 (2011).
Kitano, M. et al. Bcl6 protein expression shapes pre-germinal center B cell dynamics and follicular helper T cell heterogeneity. Immunity 34, 961–972 (2011).
Weinstein, J.S. et al. B cells in T follicular helper cell development and function: separable roles in delivery of ICOS ligand and antigen. J. Immunol. 192, 3166–3179 (2014).
Yusuf, I. et al. Germinal center T follicular helper cell IL-4 production is dependent on signaling lymphocytic activation molecule receptor (CD150). J. Immunol. 185, 190–202 (2010).
Sage, P.T., Francisco, L.M., Carman, C.V. & Sharpe, A.H. The receptor PD-1 controls follicular regulatory T cells in the lymph nodes and blood. Nat. Immunol. 14, 152–161 (2013).
Bossaller, L. et al. ICOS deficiency is associated with a severe reduction of CXCR5+CD4 germinal center Th cells. J. Immunol. 177, 4927–4932 (2006).
Grimbacher, B. et al. Homozygous loss of ICOS is associated with adult-onset common variable immunodeficiency. Nat. Immunol. 4, 261–268 (2003).
Dong, C. et al. ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function. Nature 409, 97–101 (2001).
McAdam, A.J. et al. ICOS is critical for CD40-mediated antibody class switching. Nature 409, 102–105 (2001).
Tafuri, A. et al. ICOS is essential for effective T-helper-cell responses. Nature 409, 105–109 (2001).
Mak, T.W. et al. Costimulation through the inducible costimulator ligand is essential for both T helper and B cell functions in T cell-dependent B cell responses. Nat. Immunol. 4, 765–772 (2003).
Coyle, A.J. et al. The CD28-related molecule ICOS is required for effective T cell-dependent immune responses. Immunity 13, 95–105 (2000).
Fos, C. et al. ICOS ligation recruits the p50alpha PI3K regulatory subunit to the immunological synapse. J. Immunol. 181, 1969–1977 (2008).
Kong, K.F. et al. Protein kinase C-η controls CTLA-4-mediated regulatory T cell function. Nat. Immunol. 15, 465–472 (2014).
Kong, K.F. et al. A motif in the V3 domain of the kinase PKC-θ determines its localization in the immunological synapse and functions in T cells via association with CD28. Nat. Immunol. 12, 1105–1112 (2011).
Rudd, C.E. & Schneider, H. Unifying concepts in CD28, ICOS and CTLA4 co-receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 544–556 (2003).
Gigoux, M. et al. Inducible costimulator promotes helper T-cell differentiation through phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20371–20376 (2009).
Li, J. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent signaling pathways contribute to ICOS-mediated T cell costimulation in acute graft-versus-host disease in mice. J. Immunol. 191, 200–207 (2013).
Rolf, J. et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in T cells regulates the magnitude of the germinal center reaction. J. Immunol. 185, 4042–4052 (2010).
Nance, J.P. et al. Bcl6 middle domain repressor function is required for T follicular helper cell differentiation and utilizes the corepressor MTA3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13324–13329 (2015).
Akira, S. & Takeda, K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 499–511 (2004).
Goenka, R. et al. Cutting edge: dendritic cell-restricted antigen presentation initiates the follicular helper T cell program but cannot complete ultimate effector differentiation. J. Immunol. 187, 1091–1095 (2011).
Barnett, L.G. et al. B cell antigen presentation in the initiation of follicular helper T cell and germinal center differentiation. J. Immunol. 192, 3607–3617 (2014).
Tubo, N.J. et al. Single naive CD4+ T cells from a diverse repertoire produce different effector cell types during infection. Cell 153, 785–796 (2013).
Häcker, H. et al. Specificity in Toll-like receptor signalling through distinct effector functions of TRAF3 and TRAF6. Nature 439, 204–207 (2006).
Sato, S. et al. Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF) associates with TNF receptor-associated factor 6 and TANK-binding kinase 1, and activates two distinct transcription factors, NF-κ B and IFN-regulatory factor-3, in the Toll-like receptor signaling. J. Immunol. 171, 4304–4310 (2003).
Sharma, S. et al. Triggering the interferon antiviral response through an IKK-related pathway. Science 300, 1148–1151 (2003).
Fitzgerald, K.A. et al. IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway. Nat. Immunol. 4, 491–496 (2003).
McWhirter, S.M. et al. Crystallographic analysis of CD40 recognition and signaling by human TRAF2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8408–8413 (1999).
Bonnard, M. et al. Deficiency of T2K leads to apoptotic liver degeneration and impaired NF-κB-dependent gene transcription. EMBO J. 19, 4976–4985 (2000).
Jin, J. et al. The kinase TBK1 controls IgA class switching by negatively regulating noncanonical NF-κB signaling. Nat. Immunol. 13, 1101–1109 (2012).
Ishii, K.J. et al. TANK-binding kinase-1 delineates innate and adaptive immune responses to DNA vaccines. Nature 451, 725–729 (2008).
Pomerantz, J.L. & Baltimore, D. NF-κB activation by a signaling complex containing TRAF2, TANK and TBK1, a novel IKK-related kinase. EMBO J. 18, 6694–6704 (1999).
Oganesyan, G. et al. Critical role of TRAF3 in the Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent antiviral response. Nature 439, 208–211 (2006).
Li, C. et al. Structurally distinct recognition motifs in lymphotoxin-β receptor and CD40 for tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF)-mediated signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50523–50529 (2003).
Linterman, M.A. et al. Roquin differentiates the specialized functions of duplicated T cell costimulatory receptor genes CD28 and ICOS. Immunity 30, 228–241 (2009).
Linterman, M.A. et al. CD28 expression is required after T cell priming for helper T cell responses and protective immunity to infection. eLife 3, 3 (2014).
Weber, J.P. et al. ICOS maintains the T follicular helper cell phenotype by down-regulating Krüppel-like factor 2. J. Exp. Med. 212, 217–233 (2015).
Leavenworth, J.W., Verbinnen, B., Yin, J., Huang, H. & Cantor, H. A p85α-osteopontin axis couples the receptor ICOS to sustained Bcl-6 expression by follicular helper and regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 16, 96–106 (2015).
Nurieva, R.I. et al. Generation of T follicular helper cells is mediated by interleukin-21 but independent of T helper 1, 2, or 17 cell lineages. Immunity 29, 138–149 (2008).
Xu, H. et al. Follicular T-helper cell recruitment governed by bystander B cells and ICOS-driven motility. Nature 496, 523–527 (2013).
Sanjo, H., Zajonc, D.M., Braden, R., Norris, P.S. & Ware, C.F. Allosteric regulation of the ubiquitin:NIK and ubiquitin:TRAF3 E3 ligases by the lymphotoxin-β receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 17148–17155 (2010).
Chen, R. et al. In vivo RNA interference screens identify regulators of antiviral CD4+ and CD8+ T cell differentiation. Immunity 41, 325–338 (2014).
Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J.R. III. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 242–247 (2001).
Xu, T. et al. ProLuCID: An improved SEQUEST-like algorithm with enhanced sensitivity and specificity. J. Proteomics 129, 16–24 (2015).
Tabb, D.L., McDonald, W.H. & Yates, J.R. III. DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1, 21–26 (2002).
Park, S.K., Venable, J.D., Xu, T. & Yates, J.R. III. A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 5, 319–322 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Altman and Crotty laboratories for discussions; the Flow Cytometry Core Unit, the Microscopy Unit and the Animal Husbandry Unit of the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology for services; P. Beemiller for imaging and bioinformatics services and assistance in computational analyses of immunohistochemistry with Matlab software; and the National Disease Resource Interchange for clinical samples. Supported by the US National Institutes of Health (CA35299 to A.A.; and AI109976, AI063107 and AI072543 to S.C.) and the Melanoma Research Alliance (Young Investigator Award 270056 to K.-F.K.). This is publication number 1794 from the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.P. and A.J.C.-B. designed experiments, collected data and performed analyses; Y.Z. and J.R.Y. did the proteomics experiments and analyses; J.K.H. did the immunofluorescence and microscopy; Y.S.C. provided reagents and was involved in study design; and A.A., S.C. and K.-F.K. designed the study, analyzed data and wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Integrated supplementary information
Supplementary Figure 1 Evolutionary conservation of the ICOS cytoplamic tail, and of the ‘serine tongs’ of TRAF2 and TRAF3.
Amino acid sequences of the cytoplamic tail of putative ICOS orthologs from the indicated organisms are shown in a. The conserved proximal (IProx, in red), PI3K-binding YxxM (in blue) and distal (in brown) motifs are indicated. (b,c) Protein sequences of putative TRAF2 (b) and TRAF3 (c) orthologs from indicated organisms were aligned with the IProx motif of human ICOS. Conserved amino acid residues between IProx and TRAFs are indicated in red.
Supplementary Figure 2 Surface expression of reconstituted ICOS and efficiency of the in vivo knockdown of Icos and Tbk1.
(a) Histogram of GFP+ CD4+ T cells from host B6 mice 7 d after adoptive transfer of Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with RV encoding empty vector (EV) or wild-type ICOS (WT) or mIProx, YF or TL mutant and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Cumulative data for a (b) from two independent experiments. (c) Schematic representation of mouse Tbk1 transcript of 2750 bp along with the open reading frame (blue arrow). Regions targeted by shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2 are indicated with short red lines. Diagram not drawn to scale. (d – g) Quantitation of Icos (d, e) and Tbk1 (f, g) transcripts in SMARTA CD4+ T cells from host B6 mice 3 d (d, f) or 7 d (e, g) after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Shown are the fold-change (mean ± SEM) from two independent experiments. Each data point represents a single mouse. *P < 0.05; NS, not significant; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections analysis.
Supplementary Figure 3 Quantification of SMARTA CD4+ T cells in the spleen.
(a) Number of reconstituted Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells in host B6 mice 7 d after adoptive transfer of Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with RV encoding empty vector (EV) or wild-type ICOS (WT) or mIProx, YF or TL mutant ICOS and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. (b) Number of SMARTA CD4+ T cells in host B6 mice 7 d after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Shown are cumulative data (mean ± SEM) from two independent experiments. Each data point represents a single mouse. *P < 0.01; NS, not significant; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections analysis.
Supplementary Figure 4 The ICOS IProx motif and TBK1 affect the development of CXCR5+PD1+ GC TFH cells in Bcl6fl/flCD4-Cre mice following immunization with peptide.
(a) Flow cytometry of cells from host CD4-Cre x Bcl6fl/fl mice 10 d after adoptive transfer of Icos−/– SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with RV encoding empty vector (EV) or wild-type ICOS (WT) or mIProx, YF or TL mutant and immunized with KLH-gp61 plus adjuvant. (b) Flow cytometry of cells from host CD4-Cre x Bcl6fl/fl mice 10 d after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and immunized with KLH-gp61 plus adjuvant. Numbers adjacent to outlined areas indicate percent CXCR5+PD1hi GC TFH cells. Cumulative data for a (c), or b (d) from two independent experiments. Each data point represents a single mouse. Shown is mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections.
Supplementary Figure 5 TBK1 is dispensable for the differentiation of nascent TFH cells.
(a) Flow cytometry of cells from host B6 mice 3 d after adoptive transfer of SMARTA CD4+ T cells transduced with shRNA targeting the Tbk1 (shTbk1-1 and shTbk1-2), Icos or control genes and infected with LCMV Armstrong strain. Numbers adjacent to outlined areas indicate percent CXCR5+SLAMlo TFH cells. Cumulative data for a (b) from two independent experiments. (c - f) Mean fluorescent intensity of CXCR5 (c), TCRβ (d), CD28 (e) and CD40L (f) protein expressions in CD4+GFP+ T cells. Each data point represents a single mouse. Shown are mean ± SEM; *P < 0.01; NS, not significant; ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s corrections.
Supplementary Figure 6 ICOS signalosome is independent of TRAF molecules and IKKɛ.
ICOS immunoprecipitations (IPs) from mouse primary CD4+ T cells activated in vitro with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 and rested in IL-2. Cells were left unstimulated (–) or restimulated with anti-CD3 plus anti-ICOS (+) for 2 minutes. IPs or whole cell lysates (WCL) were immunoblotted with the indicated Abs. 5 % WCL was used as input to control for immunoprecipitation.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–6 (PDF 819 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pedros, C., Zhang, Y., Hu, J. et al. A TRAF-like motif of the inducible costimulator ICOS controls development of germinal center TFH cells via the kinase TBK1. Nat Immunol 17, 825–833 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3463
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3463
This article is cited by
-
Aging alters antiviral signaling pathways resulting in functional impairment in innate immunity in response to pattern recognition receptor agonists
GeroScience (2022)
-
The dichotomous and incomplete adaptive immunity in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2021)
-
Structural characterization of the ICOS/ICOS-L immune complex reveals high molecular mimicry by therapeutic antibodies
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Transmembrane domain-mediated Lck association underlies bystander and costimulatory ICOS signaling
Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2020)
-
TRAF Molecules in Inflammation and Inflammatory Diseases
Current Pharmacology Reports (2018)