Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Influence of tree species on continental differences in boreal fires and climate feedbacks

Abstract

Wildfires are common in boreal forests around the globe and strongly influence ecosystem processes. However, North American forests support more high-intensity crown fires than Eurasia, where lower-intensity surface fires are common. These two types of fire can result in different net effects on climate as a consequence of their contrasting impacts on terrestrial albedo and carbon stocks. Here we use remote-sensing imagery, climate reanalysis data and forest inventories to evaluate differences in boreal fire dynamics between North America and Eurasia and their key drivers. Eurasian fires were less intense, destroyed less live vegetation, killed fewer trees and generated a smaller negative shortwave forcing. As fire weather conditions were similar across continents, we suggest that different fire dynamics between the two continents resulted from their dominant tree species. In particular, species that have evolved to spread and be consumed by crown fires as part of their life cycle dominate North American boreal forests. In contrast, tree species that have evolved to resist and suppress crown fires dominate Eurasian boreal forests. We conclude that species-level traits must be considered in global evaluations of the effects of fire on emissions and climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Maps of the boreal domain and satellite products.
Figure 2: Regional comparisons of intensity and severity.
Figure 3: Differences in post-fire albedo forcing.
Figure 4: Effects of fire strategy on fire dynamics.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ryan, K. C. Dynamic interactions between forest structure and fire behavior in boreal ecosystems. Silva Fenn. 36, 13–39 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wirth, C. in Forest Diversity and Function (eds Scherer-Lorenzen, D. M., Körner, P. D. C. & Schulze, P. D. E-D.) 309–344 (Springer, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T. & Rasch, P. J. Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D11202 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amiro, B. D. et al. The effect of post-fire stand age on the boreal forest energy balance. Agric. For. Meteorol. 140, 41–50 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Randerson, J. T. et al. The impact of boreal forest fire on climate warming. Science 314, 1130–1132 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers, B. M., Randerson, J. T. & Bonan, G. B. High-latitude cooling associated with landscape changes from North American boreal forest fires. Biogeosciences 10, 699–718 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Korovin, G. N. in Fire in Ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia (eds Goldammer, J. G. & Furyaev, V. V.) 112–128 (Springer, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Shvidenko, A. Z. & Nilsson, S. in Fire, Climate Change, and Carbon Cycling in the Boreal Forest (eds Kasischke, E. S. & Stocks, B. J.) 132–150 (Springer, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Furyaev, V. V., Vaganov, E. A., Tchebakova, N. M. & Valendik, E. N. Effects of fire and climate on successions and structural changes in the Siberian boreal forest. Eurasian J. For. Res. 2, 1–15 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wooster, M. J. & Zhang, Y. H. Boreal forest fires burn less intensely in Russia than in North America. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L20505 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McRae, D. J. et al. Variability of fire behavior, fire effects, and emissions in Scotch pine forests of central Siberia. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 11, 45–74 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Groot, W. J. et al. A comparison of Canadian and Russian boreal forest fire regimes. For. Ecol. Manage. 294, 23–34 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agee, J. K. in Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus (ed. Richardson, D. M.) 193–218 (Univ. Cambridge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mutch, R. W. Wildland fires and ecosystems—A hypothesis. Ecology 51, 1046–1051 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowe, J. S. in The Role of Fire in Northern Circumpolar Ecosystems (eds Wein, R. W. & Maclean, D. A.) 135–154 (John Wiley, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dyrness, C. & Norum, R. The effects of experimental fires on black spruce forest floors in interior Alaska. Can. J. For. Res. 13, 879–893 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Viereck, L. A. & Johnston, W. F. in Silvics of North America Vol. 1 (eds Burns, R. M. & Honkala, B. H.) 227–237 (US Forest Service, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wein, R. W. & MacLean, D. A. in The Role of Fire in Northern Circumpolar Ecosystems (eds Wein, R. W. & MacLean, D. A.) 1–18 (Wiley, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nikolov, N. & Helmisaari, H. in A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest (eds Shugart, H. H., Leemans, R. & Bonan, G. B.) 13–84 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Richardson, D. M. & Rundel, P. W. in Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus (ed. Richardson, D. M.) 3–46 (Univ. of Cambridge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Furyaev, V. V., Wein, R. W. & MacLean, D. A. in The Role of Fire in Northern Circumpolar Ecosystems Vol. 18 (eds Wein, R. W. & MacLean, D. A.) 221–234 (Wiley, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dyrness, C. T., Viereck, L. A. & Van Cleve, K. in Forest Ecosystems in the Alaskan Taiga (eds Van Cleve, K., Chapin, F. S. III, Flanagan, P. W., Viereck, L. A. & Dyrness, C. T.) 74–86 (Springer, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Furyaev, V. V. in Fire in Ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia (eds Goldammer, J. G. & Furyaev, V. V.) 168–185 (Springer, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Goetz, S. J., Mack, M. C., Gurney, K. R., Randerson, J. T. & Houghton, R. A. Ecosystem responses to recent climate change and fire disturbance at northern high latitudes: Observations and model results contrasting northern Eurasia and North America. Environ. Res. Lett. 2, 045031 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnstone, J. F. et al. Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska. Can. J. For. Res. 40, 1302–1312 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Flannigan, M., Stocks, B., Turetsky, M. & Wotton, M. Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 549–560 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tchebakova, N. M., Parfenova, E. & Soja, A. J. The effects of climate, permafrost and fire on vegetation change in Siberia in a changing climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045013 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kasischke, E. S., Christensen, N. L. & Stocks, B. J. Fire, global warming, and the carbon balance of boreal forests. Ecol. Appl. 5, 437–451 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Soja, A. J. et al. Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions versus current observations. Glob. Planet. Change 56, 274–296 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Osawa, A. & Matsuura, Y. Permafrost Ecosystems: Siberian Larch Forests (Springer, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Valendik, E. N. in Fire in Ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia (eds Goldammer, J. G. & Furyaev, V. V.) 129–138 (Springer, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, A. M. S. & Wooster, M. J. Remote classification of head and backfire types from MODIS fire radiative power and smoke plume observations. Int. J. Wildland Fire 14, 249–254 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alexander, M. E. & Cruz, M. G. Interdependencies between flame length and fireline intensity in predicting crown fire initiation and crown scorch height. Int. J. Wildland Fire 21, 95–113 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Giglio, L., Csiszar, I. & Justice, C. O. Global distribution and seasonality of active fires as observed with the Terra and Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors. J. Geophys. Res. 111, G02016 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jin, Y. et al. The influence of burn severity on postfire vegetation recovery and albedo change during early succession in North American boreal forests. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G01036 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hely, C., Flannigan, M. & Bergeron, Y. Modeling tree mortality following wildfire in the southeastern Canadian mixed-wood boreal forest. For. Sci. 49, 566–576 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dixon, R. K. & Krankina, O. N. Forest fires in Russia: Carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 700–705 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lavoue, D., Liousse, C., Cachier, H., Stocks, B. J. & Goldammer, J. G. Modeling of carbonaceous particles emitted by boreal and temperate wildfires at northern latitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 26871–26890 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Giglio, L., Loboda, T., Roy, D. P., Quayle, B. & Justice, C. O. An active-fire based burned area mapping algorithm for the MODIS sensor. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 408–420 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Van der Werf, G. R. et al. Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11707–11735 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Oleson, K. W. et al. Technical Description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM) (NCAR Earth System Laboratory, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Michaletz, S. T., Johnson, E. A., Mell, W. E. & Greene, D. F. Timing of fire relative to seed development may enable non-serotinous species to recolonize from the aerial seed banks of fire-killed trees. Biogeosciences 10, 5061–5078 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gower, S. T. & Richards, J. H. Larches: Deciduous conifers in an evergreen world. Bioscience 40, 818–826 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bergeron, Y., Flannigan, M., Gauthier, S., Leduc, A. & Lefort, P. Past, current and future fire frequency in the Canadian boreal forest: Implications for sustainable forest management. Ambio 33, 356–360 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rupp, T. S., Starfield, A. M., Chapin, F. S. & Duffy, P. Modeling the impact of black spruce on the fire regime of Alaskan boreal forest. Climatic Change 55, 213–233 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Davis, M. B. in Forest Succession: Concepts and Applications (eds West, D. C., Shugart, H. H. & Botkin, D. B.) 132–153 (Springer, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Lloyd, A. H. et al. in Alaska’s Changing Boreal Forest (eds Chapin, F. S. III, Oswood, M. W., Van Cleve, K., Viereck, L. A. & Verbyla, D. L.) 62–80 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Girardin, M. P. et al. Vegetation limits the impact of a warm climate on boreal wildfires. New Phytol. 199, 1001–1011 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Turetsky, M. R., Amiro, B. D., Bosch, E. & Bhatti, J. S. Historical burn area in western Canadian peatlands and its relationship to fire weather indices. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB4014 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Staver, A. C., Archibald, S. & Levin, S. A. The global extent and determinants of savanna and forest as alternative biome states. Science 334, 230–232 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). NSF support included a Graduate Research Fellowship (ID 2009067341) to B.M.R. and a Decadal and Regional Climate Prediction using Earth System Models award to J.T.R. (AGS-1048890). This work was also supported by NASA Carbon Cycle (NNX11AF96G), Atmosphere (NNX10AT83G), and Interdisciplinary Research in Earth Science (NNH09ZDA-IDS-0116) programs, and the Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE). We thank S. Conard, W. Kurz, S. Goetz and S. Davis for conversations on continental fire patterns, the National Research Council Canada for providing mapped forest inventory data, and the NASA LP DAAC for data distribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.M.R., J.T.R., M.L.G. and A.J.S. designed research; B.M.R. performed the research; A.J.S. provided Russian vegetation data sets; B.M.R. drafted the paper; J.T.R., M.L.G. and A.J.S. contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan M. Rogers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 4500 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogers, B., Soja, A., Goulden, M. et al. Influence of tree species on continental differences in boreal fires and climate feedbacks. Nature Geosci 8, 228–234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2352

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2352

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology