Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Appropriate protection of Mars

Nature Geoscience volume 6, pages 587–588 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Geological and biological processes have eliminated all but the faintest traces of our earliest ancestors on Earth. To understand the origin of life, we must investigate other planets — but we can find what we seek only if we do not contaminate them with Earth life first.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A Viking lander, enclosed in a bioshield designed to protect against the re-contamination by microbes after heat treatment, is loaded into an oven at the Kennedy Space Center to undergo full-system sterilization.

© NASA

References

  1. Meltzer, M. When Biospheres Collide: A History of NASA's Planetary Protection Programs (NASA SP-4234, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fairén, A. G. & Schulze-Makuch, D. Nature Geosci. 6, 510–511 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Research Council of the National Academies. Assessment of Planetary Protection Requirements for Mars Sample Return Missions (National Academies Press, 2009).

  4. Ammann, W. et al. Mars Sample Return backward contamination – Strategic advice and requirements (European Science Foundation, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelley, D. S., Baross, J. A. & Delaney, J. R. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 30, 385–491 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgonie, G. et al. Nature 474, 79–82 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, R. & Mendis, K. M. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15, 564–594 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, W. et al. PLoS ONE 8, e62437 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schuerger, A. C., Ulrich, R., Berry, B. J. & Nicholson, W. L. Astrobiology 13, 1–17 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Vera, J-P. et al. Astrobiology 10, 215–227 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bionetics Corporation. Lessons Learned from the Viking Planetary Quarantine and Contamination Control Experience (NASA NASW-4355, 1990).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. John D. Rummel is the Chair of the COSPAR Panel on Planetary Protection and is at the Institute for Coastal Science and Policy, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Catharine A. Conley is the NASA Planetary Protection Officer with the Science Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington DC 20546, USA,

    Catharine A. Conley & John D. Rummel

Authors
  1. Catharine A. Conley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John D. Rummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Rummel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conley, C., Rummel, J. Appropriate protection of Mars. Nature Geosci 6, 587–588 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1908

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1908

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing