Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

New views on RPE65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis

Abstract

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is the most serious form of the autosomal recessive childhood-onset retinal dystrophies. Mutations in the gene encoding RPE65, a protein vital for regeneration of the visual pigment rhodopsin in the retinal pigment epithelium1, account for 10–15% of LCA cases2,3. Whereas previous studies of RPE65 deficiency in both animal models1,4 and patients5,6 attributed remaining visual function to cones, we show here that light-evoked retinal responses in fact originate from rods. For this purpose, we selectively impaired either rod or cone function in Rpe65−/− mice by generating double– mutant mice with models of pure cone function7 (rhodopsin-deficient mice; Rho−/−) and pure rod function8 (cyclic nucleotide–gated channel α3–deficient mice; Cnga3−/−). The electroretinograms (ERGs) of Rpe65−/− and Rpe65−/−Cnga3−/− mice were almost identical, whereas there was no assessable response in Rpe65−/−Rho−/− mice. Thus, we conclude that the rod system is the source of vision in RPE65 deficiency. Furthermore, we found that lack of RPE65 enables rods to mimic cone function by responding under normally cone-isolating lighting conditions. We propose as a mechanism decreased rod sensitivity due to a reduction in rhodopsin content to less than 1%. In general, the dissection of pathophysiological processes in animal models through the introduction of additional, selective mutations is a promising concept in functional genetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Rpe65−/− mice have a strongly reduced sensitivity to light.
Figure 2: a, Scotopic single-flash ERG responses of Rpe65−/− mice are very similar to normal rod waveforms, but are unlike cone responses.
Figure 3: Rods are the source of vision in RPE65 deficiency.
Figure 4: The loss of function in Rpe65−/−Rho−/− mice is not associated with changes in retinal morphology.
Figure 5: RPE65 deficiency permits rod vision in photopic (light-adapted) conditions.
Figure 6: Single-channel and merged confocal images of the mouse photoreceptor–RPE interface triple-labeled to demonstrate the expression of RPE65.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Redmond, T.M. et al. Rpe65 is necessary for production of 11-cis -vitamin A in the retinal visual cycle. Nature Genet. 20, 344–351 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gu, S. et al. Mutations in RPE65 cause autosomal recessive childhood-onset severe retinal dystrophy. Nature Genet. 17, 194–197 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marlhens, F. et al. Mutations in RPE65 cause Leber's congenital amaurosis. Nature Genet. 17, 139–141 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veske, A., Nilsson, S.E.G., Narfström, K. & Gal, A. Retinal dystrophy of Swedish Briard/Briard-beagle dogs is due to a 4-bp deletion in RPE65. Genomics 57, 57–61 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenz, B. et al. Early-onset severe rod-cone dystrophy in young children with RPE65 mutations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 2735–2742 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson, D.A. et al. Genetics and phenotypes of RPE65 mutations in inherited retinal degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 4293–4299 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaissle, G.B. et al. Evaluation of the rhodopsin knockout mouse as a model of pure cone function. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42, 506–513 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biel, M. et al. Selective loss of cone function in mice lacking the cyclic nucleotide–gated channel CNG3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7553–7557 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Humphries, M.M. et al. Retinopathy induced in mice by targeted disruption of the rhodopsin gene. Nature Genet. 15, 216–219 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirano, A.A. et al. Cloning and immunocytochemical localization of a cyclic nucleotide–gated channel alpha-subunit to all cone photoreceptors in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 421, 80–94 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kohl, S. et al. Total colourblindness is caused by mutations in the gene encoding the alpha-subunit of the cone photoreceptor cGMP-gated cation channel. Nature Genet. 19, 257–259 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marmor, M. & Zrenner, E. Standard for clinical electroretinography (1994 update). Doc. Ophthalmol. 89, 199–210 (1995).

  13. Fishman, G.A. & Sokol, S. Electrophysiologic Testing (American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heckenlively, J.R. & Arden, G.B. in Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (eds. Heckenlively, J.R. & Arden, G.B.) (Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Hooser, J.P. et al. Rapid restoration of visual pigment and function with oral retinoid in a mouse model of childhood blindness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8623–8628 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dowling, J.E. Night blindness, dark adaptation, and the electroretinogram. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 50, 875–889 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, M.M. & Lamb, T.D. Light adaptation and dark adaptation of human rod photoreceptors measured from the a-wave of the electroretinogram. J. Physiol. 518, 479–496 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Paupoo, A.A. et al. Human cone photoreceptor responses measured by the electroretinogram a-wave during and after exposure to intense illumination. J. Physiol. 529, 469–482 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baylor, D.A., Lamb, T.D. & Yau, K.W. Responses of retinal rods to single photons. J. Physiol. 288, 613–634 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Connor, J.D. & MacLeod, D.I. Rod photoreceptors detect rapid flicker. Science 195, 698–699 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadowski, B. & Zrenner, E. Differential diagnosis of cone dystrophies. Ophthalmologe 91, 719–729 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cideciyan, A.V. et al. Rod and cone visual cycle consequences of a null mutation in the 11- cis -retinol dehydrogenase gene in man. Vis. Neurosci. 17, 667–678 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamura, M., Hotta, Y., Tanikawa, A., Terasaki, H. & Miyake, Y. A high association with cone dystrophy in Fundus albipunctatus caused by mutations of the RDH5 gene. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 3925–3932 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Acland, G.M. et al. Gene therapy restores vision in a canine model of childhood blindness. Nature Genet. 28, 92–95 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wenzel, A. et al. c-fos controls the “private pathway” of light-induced apoptosis of retinal photoreceptors. J. Neurosci. 20, 81–88 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Redmond, T.M. & Hamel, C.P. Genetic analysis of RPE65: from human disease to mouse model. Methods Enzymol. 316, 705–724 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Mai and D. Greuter for technical assistance. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants SFB 430 C2, Se837/1-1 and Re318/2-1), the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Velux Foundation, Glarus, Switzerland and the Fortüne program of the University of Tübingen (grant number 845).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathias W. Seeliger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seeliger, M., Grimm, C., Ståhlberg, F. et al. New views on RPE65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet 29, 70–74 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng712

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing