This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Frey, B.J. et al. Nat. Genet. 37, 991–996 (2005).
Bertone, P. et al. Science 306, 2242–2246 (2004).
Gygi, S.P. et al. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1720–1730 (1999).
Futcher, B. et al. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7357–7368 (1999).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to D. Li for critical revision of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation to J.-R.W. and R.Z. (30230110, 0637S12442 and 30425021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Supplementary information
Supplementary Table 1
Matches of mass-identified peptides and exons that passed primary filters. (PDF 1351 kb)
Supplementary Table 2
Matches of mass-identified peptides and exons that passed stringent filters. (PDF 963 kb)
Supplementary Table 3
RefSeq genes corresponding to the group of 28 exons with the highest abundance and matched peptides. (PDF 20 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheng, QH., Wang, LS., Dai, J. et al. Comparison of a proteomic approach with a microarray-based approach to detect exons in the mouse genome. Nat Genet 38, 1223–1224 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1106-1223
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1106-1223