Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Selective ablation of differentiated cells permits isolation of embryonic stem cell lines from murine embryos with a non–permissive genetic background

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells enable the engineering of precise modifications to the mouse genome by gene targeting. Although there are reports of cultured cell contributions to chimaeras in golden hamster1, rat2 and pig3, definitive ES cell lines which contribute to the germline have not been demonstrated in any species but mouse. Among mouse strains, genetic background strongly affects the efficiency of ES isolation, and almost all ES lines in use are derived from strain 129 (refs 1,4,5) or, less commonly, C57BL/6 (refs 6–8). The CBA strain is refractory to ES isolation and there are no published reports of CBA-derived ES lines. Hence, CBA mice may provide a convenient model of ES isolation in other species. In ES derivation it is critical that the primary explant be cultured for a sufficient time to allow multiplication of ES cell progenitors, yet without allowing extensive differentiation9,10. Thus, differences in ES derivation between mouse strains may reflect differences in the control of ES progenitor cells by other lineages within the embryo. Here we describe a strategy to continuously remove differentiated cells by drug selection, which generates germline competent ES lines from genotypes that are non-permissive in the absence of selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Zixuan Zhao, Xinyi Chen, … Hanry Yu

References

  1. Doetschman, T.C., Eistetter, H., Katz, M., Schmidt, W. & Kemler, R. The in vitro development of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and myocardium. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 87, 27–45 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iannaccone, P.M., Taborn, G.U., Garton, R.L., Caplice, M.D. & Brenin, D.R. Pluripotent embryonic stem cells from the rat are capable of producing chimaeras. Dev. Biol. 163, 288–292 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wheeler, M.B. Development and validation of swine embryonic stem cells: a review. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 6, 563–568 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Evans, M.J. & Kaufman, M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–156 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Magin, T.M., McWhir, J. & Melton, D.W. A new mouse embryonic stem cell line with good germ line contribution and gene targeting frequency. Nucl. Acids. Res. 20, 3795–3796 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawase, E. et al. Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 38, 385–390 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lederman, B. & Burki, K. Establishment of a germ-line competent C57BL/6 embryonic stem cell line. Exp. Cell. Res. 197, 254–258 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suemori, H. & Nakatsuji, N. Establishment of the embryo-derived (ES) cell lines from mouse blastocysts: effects of the feeder cell layer. Dev. Growth. Differ. 29, 133–140 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, E.J. Embryo-derived stem cells. in Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells a practical approach. (ed. Robertson, E.J.) 71–112 (IRL Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abbondanzo, S.J., Gadi, I. & Stewart, C.L. Derivation of embryonic stem cell lines. Meth. Enzym. 225, 803–823 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Okazawa, H. et al. The oct3 gene, a gene for an embryonic transcription factor, is controlled by a retinoic acid repressible enhancer. EMBO. J. 10, 2997–3005 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Shushan, E., Pikarsky, E., Klar, A. & Bergman, Y. Extinction of Oct-3/4 gene expression in embryonal carcinoma X fibroblast somatic cell hybrids is accompanied by changes in the methylation status, chromatin structure and transcriptional activity of the Oct-3/4 upstream region. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 891–901 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosner, M.H. et al. A POU-domain transcription factor in early stem cells and germ cells of the mammalian embryo. Nature 345, 686–692 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeom, Y.I. et al. Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells Development 122, 881–894 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartzberg, P.L., Goff, S.P. & Robertson, E.J. Germ-line transmission of a c-abl mutation produced by targeted gene disruption in ES cells. Science 246, 799–803 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dechiara, T.M., Efstratiadis, A. & Robertson, E. A growth deficiency phenotype in heterozygous mice carrying an insulin-like growth factor 2 gene disrupted by targeting. Nature 345, 78–80 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hooper, M.L. Embryonal stem cells: introducing planned changes into the animal germline 147 (Harwood Academic Publishers, Switzerland, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson, S., Clarke, A.R., Pow, A.M., Hooper, M.L. & Melton, D.W. Germ line transmission and expression of a corrected HPRT gene produced by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Cell 56, 313–321 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Selfridge, J., Pow, A.M., McWhir, J., Magin, T.M. & Melton, D.W. Gene targeting using a mouse HPRT minigene/HPRT-deficient embryonic stem cell system: Inactivation of the mouse ERCC-1 gene. Somat. Cell. Mol. Genet. 18, 325–336 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomsen, D.R., Stenburg, R.M., Goins, W.F. & Stinski, M.F. Promoter regulatory region of the major immediate early gene of human cytomegalovirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81, 659–663 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hogan, B., Costantini, F. & Lacey, E. Manipulating. the. mouse. embryo:A. laboratory. manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coward, P. et al. Polymorphism of a CAG tri nucleotide repeat within SRY correlates with B6. YDom sex reversal. Nature. Genet. 6, 245–250 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bradley, A. Production and analysis of chimaeras. in Teratocarcinomas. and. embryonic. stem. cells. a. practical. approach. (ed. E.J. Robertson) 113–151 (IRL Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McWhir, J., Schnieke, A., Ansell, R. et al. Selective ablation of differentiated cells permits isolation of embryonic stem cell lines from murine embryos with a non–permissive genetic background. Nat Genet 14, 223–226 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1096-223

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1096-223

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing