1. 1.

   Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. J. Officiel L213 (1998).

   • • Google Scholar
2. 2.

   Knoppers, B.M., Hirtle, M., Lormeau, S., Laberge, C. & Laflamme, M. Control of DNA samples and information. Genomics 50, 385–401 ( 1998).

   • • Google Scholar
3. 3.

   Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (UNESCO, International Bioethics Committee, Paris, 1997).

   • • Google Scholar
4. 4.

   Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Committee statement on the principled conduct of genetic research. Genome Dig. 3, 2–3 (1996).

   • • Google Scholar
5. 5.

   Latin American Human Genome Program (PLAGH) Declaration of Manzanillo. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 48, 424 –426 (1997).

   • • Google Scholar
6. 6.

   European Commission, Working Group on the Ethical, Social and Legal Aspects of Human Genome Analysis, Report of 31 December 1991, (WG-ESLA). Bull. Med. Ethics 19– 20 (1993).

   • • Google Scholar
7. 7.

   World Medical Association Declaration on the Human Genome Project. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 44, 150–152 (1993).

   • • Google Scholar
8. 8.

   FIGO Committee for the Study of Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction recommendations on ethical issues in obstetrics and gynaecology—patenting human genes. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 48, 447–448 (1997).

   • • Google Scholar
9. 9.

   First South-North human genome conference declaration on patenting of human DNA sequences. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 44, 362–363 (1993).

   • • Google Scholar
10. 10.

    Marshall, E. DNA studies challenge the meaning of race. Science 282, 654–655 (1998).

    • • Google Scholar
11. 11.

    Juengst, E. Group identity and human diversity: keeping biology straight. from culture Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 673– 677 (1998).

    • • CAS
      • PubMed
      • Article
      • Google Scholar
12. 12.

    Baslar, K. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, 1998).

    • • Google Scholar
13. 13.

    Knoppers, B.M. Human Dignity and Genetic Heritage (Law Reform Commission of Canada, Ottawa, 1991).

    • • Google Scholar
14. 14.

    Proposed International Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics and Genetic Services (World Health Organization, Geneva, 1998).

    • • Google Scholar
15. 15.

    International Ethics Committee Statement on DNA Sampling: Control and Access (HUGO, London, 1998).

    • • Google Scholar
16. 16.

    Council of Europe. Recommendation no18 R92 (3) on genetic testing and screening for health purposes. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 43, 284–289 ( 1992).

    • • Google Scholar
17. 17.

    American Society of Human Genetics, Social Issues Committee, professional disclosure of familial genetic information. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 474–483 (1998).

    • • Google Scholar
18. 18.

    Genetic Screening: Ethical Issues (Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, 1993).

    • • Google Scholar
19. 19.

    Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Information Paper 5 (Privacy Commissioner of Australia, Commonwealth of Australia, 1996).

    • • Google Scholar
20. 20.

    Japan Society of Human Genetics Guidelines for Genetic Testing Using DNA Analysis. Eubios J. Asian Int. Bioethics 6, 137 (1996).

    • • Google Scholar
21. 21.

    Heredity: Science and Society (Committee of the Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, 1989 ).

    • • Google Scholar
22. 22.

    Control of Hereditary Diseases (World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996).

    • • Google Scholar
23. 23.

    Council of Europe. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 48, 99–105 (1997).

    • • Google Scholar
24. 24.

    Council of Europe. Recommendation R(90)3 on medical research on human beings. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 41, 461 (1990).

    • • Google Scholar
25. 25.

    Ethical Aspects of Human Tissue Banking, European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (European Commission, Brussels,1998).

    • • Google Scholar
26. 26.

    American College of Medical Genetics. Statement on storage and use of genetic material. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 1499–1500 (1995).

    • • Google Scholar
27. 27.

    Code of Practice and Guidance on Human Genetic Testing Services Supplied Direct to the Public (Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing, London, 1997).

    • • Google Scholar
28. 28.

    Statement of WHO Expert Advisory Group on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics p. 5 (World Health Organization, Geneva, 1998).

    • • Google Scholar
29. 29.

    Group of advisors ethical aspects of the patenting of inventions involving elements of human origin. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 48, 423–424 ( 1997).

    • • Google Scholar
30. 30.

    Knoppers, B.M. Biotechnology: sovereignty and sharing. in The Commercialization of Genetic Research: Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues (eds Caulfield, T. & Williams-Jones, B.) (Plenum, New York, in press).

    • • Google Scholar
31. 31.

    Eisenberg, R. Do EST patents matter? Trends Genet. 14, 379–381 (1998).

    • • Google Scholar
32. 32.

    Heller, M. & Eisenberg, R. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280 , 698–701 (1998).

    • • Google Scholar
33. 33.

    Service, R.F. Will patent fights hold DNA chips hostage? Science 282, 397 (1998).

    • • Google Scholar
34. 34.

    Statement on Gene Patenting (International Council of Scientific Unions, 1992).

    • • Google Scholar
35. 35.

    HUGO Position Statement on cDNAs: Patents (HUGO, London, 1992).

    • • Google Scholar
36. 36.

    HUGO statement on patenting of DNA sequences. Genome Dig. 2, 6–9 ( 1995).

    • • Google Scholar
37. 37.

    HUGO statement on patenting issues related to early release of raw sequence data. Genome Dig. 4, 3 (1997).

    • • Google Scholar
38. 38.

    World Medical Association Declaration on the Human Genome Project. Int. Dig. Hlth. Leg. 44, 150–152 (1993).

    • • Google Scholar
39. 39.

    Biotechnology, Patents and Morality (ed. Sterckx, S.) (Ashgate, Suffolk, 1997).

    • • Google Scholar
40. 40.

    Merz, J.F. et al. Disease gene patenting is a bad innovation. Mol. Diagnosis 2, 299 (1997).

    • • Google Scholar
41. 41.

    European Commission. Working Group on the Ethical, Social and Legal Aspects of Human Genome Analysis, (1991), Report of 31 December 1991 (WG-ESLA). Bull. Med. Ethics 19– 20 (1993).

    • • Google Scholar
42. 42.

    Law Reform Commission of Canada, Procurement and Transfer of Human Tissues and Organs, Working Paper 66 (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, 1992).

    • • Google Scholar
43. 43.

    Biotechnology Related to Human Beings, Report No. 25 (1992–1993) to the Storting on Biotechnology Related to Human Beings (Ministry of Social Affairs, Oslo, 1993).

    • • Google Scholar
44. 44.

    Human Genetics: The Science and Its Consequences, Committee Office (Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, London, 1995).

    • • Google Scholar
45. 45.

    Patenting Human Genes—A Report (Danish Council of Ethics, Copenhagen, 1994).

    • • Google Scholar
46. 46.

    Law No. 94-654 on the donation and use of elements and products of the human body, medically assisted procreation, and prenatal diagnosis. Int. Dig. Hlth Leg. 45, 473– 482 (1994).

    • • Google Scholar
47. 47.

    Pottage, A. The inscription of life in law: genes, patents and bio-politics. Modern Law Review 61, 740–765 (1998).

    • • Google Scholar
48. 48.

    Black, J. Regulation as facilitation: negotiating the genetic revolution. Modern Law Review 61, 621–660 (1998).

    • • Google Scholar

Download references