Article

Perovskite ink with wide processing window for scalable high-efficiency solar cells

  • Nature Energy 2, Article number: 17038 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/nenergy.2017.38
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Perovskite solar cells have made tremendous progress using laboratory-scale spin-coating methods in the past few years owing to advances in controls of perovskite film deposition. However, devices made via scalable methods are still lagging behind state-of-the-art spin-coated devices because of the complicated nature of perovskite crystallization from a precursor state. Here we demonstrate a chlorine-containing methylammonium lead iodide precursor formulation along with solvent tuning to enable a wide precursor-processing window (up to 8 min) and a rapid grain growth rate (as short as 1 min). Coupled with antisolvent extraction, this precursor ink delivers high-quality perovskite films with large-scale uniformity. The ink can be used by both spin-coating and blade-coating methods with indistinguishable film morphology and device performance. Using a blade-coated absorber, devices with 0.12-cm2 and 1.2-cm2 areas yield average efficiencies of 18.55% and 17.33%, respectively. We further demonstrate a 12.6-cm2 four-cell module (88% geometric fill factor) with 13.3% stabilized active-area efficiency output.

  • Subscribe to Nature Energy for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , ,  & Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6050–6051 (2009).

  2. 2.

    et al. Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2, 591 (2012).

  3. 3.

    , , ,  & Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 338, 643–647 (2012).

  4. 4.

    et al. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499, 316–319 (2013).

  5. 5.

    et al. Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 13, 897–903 (2014).

  6. 6.

    et al. Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 517, 476–480 (2015).

  7. 7.

    et al. High-performance photovoltaic perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science 348, 1234–1237 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Best Research-Cell Efficiencies (NREL, 2016);

  9. 9.

    , ,  & Microstructures of organometal trihalide perovskites for solar cells: their evolution from solutions and characterization. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4827–4839 (2015).

  10. 10.

    et al. In situ investigation of the formation and metastability of formamidinium lead tri-iodide perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2372–2382 (2016).

  11. 11.

    , ,  & Current challenges and prospective research for upscaling hybrid perovskite photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 811–819 (2016).

  12. 12.

    , ,  & Research update: large-area deposition, coating, printing, and processing techniques for the upscaling of perovskite solar cell technology. APL Mater. 4, 091508 (2016).

  13. 13.

    et al. Perovskite solar cells and large area modules (100 cm2) based on an air flow-assisted PbI2 blade coating deposition process. J. Power Sources 277, 286–291 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. High-performance fully printable perovskite solar cells via blade-coating technique under the ambient condition. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500328 (2015).

  15. 15.

    et al. Scalable fabrication of efficient organolead trihalide perovskite solar cells with doctor-bladed active layers. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1544–1550 (2015).

  16. 16.

    et al. Toward large scale roll-to-roll production of fully printed perovskite solar cells. Adv. Mater. 27, 1241–1247 (2015).

  17. 17.

    et al. Efficient planar heterojunction mixed-halide perovskite solar cells deposited via spray-deposition. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2944–2950 (2014).

  18. 18.

    , ,  & Inkjet printing and instant chemical transformation of a CH3NH3PbI3/nanocarbon electrode and interface for planar perovskite solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13239–13243 (2014).

  19. 19.

    et al. Inkjet printing of CH3NH3PbI3 on a mesoscopic TiO2 film for highly efficient perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 9092–9097 (2015).

  20. 20.

    , ,  & A scalable electrodeposition route to the low-cost, versatile and controllable fabrication of perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 15, 216–226 (2015).

  21. 21.

    et al. Direct conversion of CH3NH3PbI3 from electrodeposited PbO for highly efficient planar perovskite solar cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 15889 (2015).

  22. 22.

    et al. Interfacial modification of hole transport layers for efficient large-area perovskite solar cells achieved via blade-coating. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 144, 309–315 (2016).

  23. 23.

    et al. Large-area hysteresis-free perovskite solar cells via temperature controlled doctor blading under ambient environment. Appl. Mater. Today 3, 96–102 (2016).

  24. 24.

    et al. Morphology changes upon scaling a high-efficiency, solution-processed solar cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2835–2846 (2016).

  25. 25.

    et al. Solid-state solar modules based on mesoscopic organometal halide perovskite: a route towards the up-scaling process. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 3918–3923 (2014).

  26. 26.

    et al. A large area (70 cm2) monolithic perovskite solar module with a high efficiency and stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3687–3692 (2016).

  27. 27.

    et al. Benefits of very thin PCBM and LiF layers for solution-processed p-i-n perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2642–2646 (2014).

  28. 28.

    et al. Pinhole-free perovskite films for efficient solar modules. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 484–489 (2016).

  29. 29.

    et al. A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 345, 295–298 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Perovskite-based solar cells: impact of morphology and device architecture on device performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8943–8969 (2015).

  31. 31.

    et al. A fast deposition-crystallization procedure for highly efficient lead iodide perovskite thin-film solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 9898–9903 (2014).

  32. 32.

    et al. Highly reproducible perovskite solar cells with average efficiency of 18.3% and best efficiency of 19.7% fabricated via Lewis base adduct of lead(II) iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8696–8699 (2015).

  33. 33.

     & CH3NH3Cl-assisted one-step solution growth of CH3NH3PbI3: structure, charge-carrier dynamics, and photovoltaic properties of perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 9412–9418 (2014).

  34. 34.

    et al. Hybrid halide perovskite solar cell precursors: colloidal chemistry and coordination engineering behind device processing for high efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4460–4468 (2015).

  35. 35.

    et al. Room-temperature crystallization of hybrid-perovskite thin films via solvent-solvent extraction for high-performance solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8178–8184 (2015).

  36. 36.

    et al. High performance of planar perovskite solar cells produced from PbI2(DMSO) and PbI2(NMP) complexes by intramolecular exchange. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1500768 (2016).

  37. 37.

    et al. Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 345, 542–546 (2014).

  38. 38.

    et al. Square-centimeter solution-processed planar CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells with efficiency exceeding 15%. Adv. Mater. 27, 6363–6370 (2015).

  39. 39.

    et al. Solvent annealing of perovskite-induced crystal growth for photovoltaic-device efficiency enhancement. Adv. Mater. 26, 6503–6509 (2014).

  40. 40.

    , ,  & Photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells with different grain sizes. Adv. Mater. 28, 917–922 (2016).

  41. 41.

    et al. Ultra-thin high efficiency semitransparent perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 13, 249–257 (2015).

  42. 42.

    et al. Pushing efficiency limits for semitransparent perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 24071–24081 (2015).

  43. 43.

    et al. Efficient semitransparent perovskite solar cells for 23.0%-efficiency perovskite/silicon four-terminal tandem cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1601128 (2016).

  44. 44.

    et al. Efficient charge extraction and slow recombination in organic-inorganic perovskites capped with semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1439–1449 (2016).

  45. 45.

    et al. Heterojunction modification for highly efficient organic-inorganic perovskite solar cells. Acs Nano 8, 12701–12709 (2014).

  46. 46.

    et al. A two-step route to planar perovskite cells exhibiting reduced hysteresis. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 143902 (2015).

  47. 47.

    et al. Cooperative tin oxide fullerene electron selective layers for high-performance planar perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 14276–14283 (2016).

  48. 48.

    et al. A vacuum flash-assisted solution process for high-efficiency large-area perovskite solar cells. Science 353, 58–62 (2016).

  49. 49.

    et al. Gas-assisted preparation of lead iodide perovskite films consisting of a monolayer of single crystalline grains for high efficiency planar solar cells. Nano Energy 10, 10–18 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory is supported by the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. We acknowledge the support by the hybrid perovskite solar cell program of the National Center for Photovoltaics funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Solar Energy Technologies Office. We thank S. Mauger for help with XRF and viscosity measurement.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Chemistry and Nanoscience Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA

    • Mengjin Yang
    • , Zhen Li
    • , Obadiah G. Reid
    • , Dong Hoe Kim
    •  & Kai Zhu
  2. Material Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA

    • Matthew O. Reese
    • , Sebastian Siol
    • , Talysa R. Klein
    • , Joseph J. Berry
    •  & Maikel F. A. M. van Hest
  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, USA

    • Yanfa Yan

Authors

  1. Search for Mengjin Yang in:

  2. Search for Zhen Li in:

  3. Search for Matthew O. Reese in:

  4. Search for Obadiah G. Reid in:

  5. Search for Dong Hoe Kim in:

  6. Search for Sebastian Siol in:

  7. Search for Talysa R. Klein in:

  8. Search for Yanfa Yan in:

  9. Search for Joseph J. Berry in:

  10. Search for Maikel F. A. M. van Hest in:

  11. Search for Kai Zhu in:

Contributions

K.Z. and M.Y. conceived the idea and designed the experiment. M.Y., Z.L., and D.H.K. fabricated and characterized perovskite thin film and devices. M.Y. and M.O.R. optimized large-area devices. M.Y., T.R.K., K.Z., and M.F.A.M.v.H. fabricated and characterized mini-module. M.Y. and S.S. measured XRF. K.Z., J.J.B., and M.F.A.M.v.H. supervised this project. K.Z. and M.Y. wrote the manuscript with inputs and discussion from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maikel F. A. M. van Hest or Kai Zhu.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1–13 and Supplementary Tables 1–3