Political divisions are important in understanding public perceptions of unconventional oil and natural gas development, but so is proximity to drilling activities. New research highlights that, as geographical distance from development areas increases, political ideology becomes more influential in explaining diverging perceptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Evaluation and re-understanding of the global natural gas hydrate resources
Petroleum Science Open Access 26 March 2021
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Davis, C. & Fisk, J. M. Rev. Pol. Res. 31, 1–16 (2014).
Boudet, H. et al. Energy Pol. 65, 57–67 (2014).
Clarke, C. E. et al. Energy Pol. 97, 301–309 (2016).
Cornell National Social Survey 2013 (Cornell University Survey Research Institute, 2013).
Abbott, A. Soc. Forces 75, 1149–1182 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schelly, C. Unconventional oil and gas: The role of politics and proximity. Nat Energy 1, 16163 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.163
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.163
This article is cited by
-
Evaluation and re-understanding of the global natural gas hydrate resources
Petroleum Science (2021)