Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Should an antimuscarinic agent be used for persistent LUTS after treatment with an α1-blocker?

Abstract

This Practice Point discusses the study by MacDiarmid and colleagues, which is the latest to support a beneficial effect of adding antimuscarinic agents to α1-blockers in men with persistent lower urinary tract symptoms. Such studies have also alleviated concerns about the adverse effects of antimuscarinic agents, particularly the risk of developing urinary retention. In practice, however, some issues regarding the use of antimuscarinic agents in this patient population remain. First, persistent storage symptoms are suggestive of other pathologies, and this possibility must be carefully evaluated before combined treatment is initiated. Second, postvoid residual urine volume should be repeatedly monitored during antimuscarinic therapy to avoid sequelae of residual urine or urinary retention. Third, the effect of adding an antimuscarinic agent is statistically significant, but might not be clinically significant for the majority of men. Better evaluation of storage symptoms might facilitate the more-appropriate use of combined treatment in this setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. MacDiarmid SA et al. (2008) Efficacy and safety of extended-release oxybutynin in combination with tamsulosin for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Mayo Clin Proc 83: 1002–1010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan SA et al. (2006) Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 296: 2319–2328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rule AD et al. (2005) Is benign prostatic hyperplasia a risk factor for chronic renal failure? J Urol 173: 691–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McNeill SA et al. (2001) Postvoid residual urine in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: pooled analysis of eleven controlled studies with alfuzosin. Urology 57: 459–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Abrams P et al. (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Homma Y et al. (2006) Symptom assessment tool for overactive bladder syndrome—overactive bladder symptom score. Urology 68: 318–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Homma, Y. Should an antimuscarinic agent be used for persistent LUTS after treatment with an α1-blocker?. Nat Rev Urol 6, 66–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1288

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing