This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Eden CG (2007) Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results. Eur Urol 52: 983–989
Weise ES and Winfield HN (2006) Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 20: 813–819
Yohannes P and Burjonrappa SC (2003) Rapid communication: laparoscopic Anderson–Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty using the da Vinci robot: technical considerations. J Endourol 17: 79–83
Link RE et al. (2006) A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 243: 486–491
Bhayani SB et al. (2005) Complete daVinci versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: cost analysis. J Endourol 19: 327–332
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Rachel Murphy, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rane, A., Keeley, F. Is robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty effective for the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction?. Nat Rev Urol 5, 244–245 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1054
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1054