Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Case Study
  • Published:

Radical prostatectomy for clinical T3 disease: expanding indications while optimizing cancer control and quality of life

Abstract

Background A 61-year-old male presented with a history of gradually rising PSA over several years. His PSA had increased from 3.3 to 7 ng/ml over 3 years.

Investigations Digital rectal examination, prostate biopsy, bone scan, and endorectal MRI were carried out to confirm the diagnosis and evaluate the extent of the cancer, with subsequent histopathologic examination of the radical prostatectomy specimen.

Diagnosis Preoperative clinical stage (based on the digital rectal examination alone) was cT3a. Biopsy demonstrated extraprostatic extension in one core (Gleason 9 [4 + 5]). Endorectal MRI suggested a large volume cancer with probable extraprostatic extension in the posterior midline at the apex. Examination of the radical prostatectomy specimen demonstrated a pT3aN0 prostate cancer (Gleason 4 + 3 = 7 with a minor component of Gleason pattern 5). Extraprostatic extension was seen in the right posterior apex in the area of the dominant tumor mass. Surgical margins and seminal vesicles were negative for cancer.

Management Radical retropubic prostatectomy with preservation of both neurovascular bundles plus bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed. Postoperative PSA has been nondetectable. The patient is continent and, with the aid of vardenafil HCl, has erections sufficient for intercourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: High-power view of a prostatic needle biopsy showing adenocarcinoma intermingling with adipose tissue, diagnostic of extraprostatic extension
Figure 2: Axial T2 weighted image demonstrating an area of focal T2 hypointensity in the right posterior apex of the prostate, with indistinct and slightly spiculated margin
Figure 3: Low-power view of the patient's radical prostatectomy specimen showing cancer invading beyond the prostatic boundaries into adipose tissue
Figure 4: High-power view of the radical prostatectomy specimen showing cancer in extraprostatic adipose tissue

References

  1. Mordkin RM et al. (1996) Management of locally advanced prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 10: 1299–1300

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pilepich MV et al. (1997) Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31. J Clin Oncol 15: 1013–1021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolla M et al. (2002) Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomized trial. Lancet 360: 103–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ward JF et al. (2005) Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing 15-year outcome. BJU Int 95: 751–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carver BS et al. (2006) Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy in men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. J Urol 176: 564–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van den Ouden D et al. (1998) Progression in and survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (T3) treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy. J Urol 160: 1392–1397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hricak H et al. (2004) The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100: 2655–2663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein JI et al. (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29: 1228–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A Eastham.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, J., Fine, S., Zhang, J. et al. Radical prostatectomy for clinical T3 disease: expanding indications while optimizing cancer control and quality of life. Nat Rev Urol 4, 451–454 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0861

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0861

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing